Toward responsible stock enhancement: Broadcast spawning dynamics and adaptive genetic management in white seabass aquaculture

Evolutionary Applications

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 405-417

  Gruenthal, Kristen M ^a   Drawbridge, Mark A ^a  

^a HUBBS SEAWORLD RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Aquaculture; Captive populations; Conservation genetics; Fisheries; Management; Population genetics empirical

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860310156     PISSN: 17524563     EISSN: 17524571     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2011.00234.x     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Aalbers, S. A., and M. A. Drawbridge 2008. White seabass spawning behavior and sound production. Transaction of the American Fisheries Society 137:542-550.
2. Akey, J. M., K. Zhang, M. Xiong, P. Doris, and L. Jin 2001. The effect that genotyping errors have on the robustness of common linkage disequilibrium measures. American Journal of Human Genetics 68:1447-1456.
3. Allen, L. G., D. J. Pondella II, and M. A. Shane 2007. Fisheries independent assessment of a returning fishery: abundance of juvenile while seabass (Atractoscion nobilis) in the shallow nearshore waters of the Southern California Bight, 1995-2005. Fisheries Research 88:24-32.
4. Allendorf, F. W., and N. Ryman 1987. Genetic management of hatchery stocks. In N. Ryman, and F. Utter, eds. Population Genetics and Fishery Management, pp. 141-159. University of Washington Press, Seattle.
5. Araki, H., and C. Schmid 2010. Is hatchery stocking a help or harm? Evidence, limitations and future direction in ecological and genetic surveys Aquaculture 308:S2-S11.
6. Araki, H., B. Cooper, and M. S. Blouin 2007. Genetic effects of captive breeding cause a rapid, cumulative fitness decline in the wild. Science 318:100-103.
7. Bartley, D. M., D. B. Kent, and M. A. Drawbridge 1995. Conservation of genetic diversity of white seabass enhancement program in southern California. American Fisheries Society Symposium 15:249-258.
8. von Bertalanffy, L. 1938. A quantitative theory of organic growth. Human Biology 10:181-213.
9. Birkhead, T. R., and A. P. Møller 1992. Sperm Competition in Birds. Evolutionary Causes and Consequences. Academic Press, San Diego.
10. Bishop, J. D. D. 1998. Fertilization in the sea: are the hazards of broadcast spawning avoided when free-spawned sperm fertilize retained eggs? Proceedings of the Royal Society B 265:721-735.
11. Blankenship, H. L., and K. M. Leber 1995. A responsible approach to marine stock enhancement. American Fisheries Society Symposium 15:167-175.
12. Botstein, D., R. L. White, M. Skolnick, and R. W. Davis 1980. Construction of a genetic linkage map in the man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. American Journal of Human Genetics 32:314-331.
13. California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG), Marine Region. 2002. White Seabass Fishery Management Plan. The Resources Agency, Sacramento, CA.
14. Coykendall, D. K. 2005. Population structure and dynamics of white seabass (Atractoscion nobilis) and the genetic effect of hatchery supplementation on the wild population. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California Davis, Davis, CA.
15. Dean, M. D., K. G. Ardlie, and M. W. Nachman 2006. The frequency of multiple paternity suggests that sperm competition is common in house mice (Mus domesticus). Molecular Ecology 15:4141-4151.
16. Donohoe, C. J. 1997. Age, growth, distribution, and food habits of recently settled white seabass, Atractoscion nobilis, off San Diego County, California. Fisheries Bulletin 95:709-721.
17. Duchesne, P., and L. Bernatchez 2002. An analytical investigation of the dynamics of inbreeding in multi-generation supportive breeding. Conservation Genetics 3:47-60.
18. Frankham, R. 1995. Effective population size/adult population size ratios in wildlife: a review. Genetical Research 66:95-107.
19. Franklin, M. P. 1997. An investigation into the population structure of white seabass (Atractoscion nobilis) in California and Mexican waters using microsatellite DNA analysis. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA.
20. Gold, J. R. 2004. Stock structure and effective size of red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) in the northern Gulf of Mexico and implications relative to stock enhancement and recruitment. In K. M. Leber, S. Kitada, H. L. Blankenship, and T. Svåsand, eds. Stock Enhancement and Sea Ranching: Developments, Pitfalls and Opportunities, 2nd edn. pp. 353-370. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford.
21. Gold, J. R., L. Ma, E. Saillant, P. S. Silva, and R. R. Vega 2008. Genetic effective size in populations of hatchery-raised red drum released for stock enhancement. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 137:1327-1344.
22. Gold, J. R., M. A. Renshaw, E. Saillant, and R. R. Vega 2010. Spawning frequency of dams and sires in a marine fish stock-enhancement hatchery. Journal of Fish Biology 77:1030-1040.
23. Hedgecock, D. 1994. Does variance in reproductive success limit effective population sizes of marine organisms? In A. Beaumont, ed. Genetics and Evolution of Aquatic Organisms. pp. 1222-1344. Chapman and Hall, London.
24. Hervas, S., K. Lorenzen, M. A. Shane, and M. A. Drawbridge 2010. Quantitative assessment of a white seabass (Atractoscion nobilis) stock enhancement program in California: post-release dispersal, growth and survival. Fisheries Research 105:237-243.
25. Jørstad, K. E. 2004. Genetic studies in marine stock enhancement in Norway. In K. M. Leber, S. Kitada, H. L. Blankenship, and T. Svåsand, eds. Stock Enhancement and Sea Ranching: Developments, Pitfalls and Opportunities, 2nd edn. pp. 339-352. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford.
26. Kalinowski, S. T., A. P. Wagner, and M. L. Taper 2006. ML-RELATE: a computer program for maximum likelihood estimation of relatedness and relationship. Molecular Ecology Notes 6:576-579.
27. Kalinowski, S. T., M. L. Taper, and T. C. Marshall 2007. Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Molecular Ecology 16:1099-1106.
28. Leber, K. M. 2004. Marine stock enhancement in the USA: status, trends, and needs. In K. M. Leber, S. Kitada, H. L. Blankenship, and T. Svåsand, eds. Stock Enhancement and Sea Ranching: Developments, Pitfalls and Opportunities, 2nd edn. pp. 11-24. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford.
29. Leet, W. S., C. M. Dewees, R. Klingbeil, and E. J. Larson 2001. California's Living Marine Resources: A Status Report. CDFG. The Resources Agency, Sacramento, CA. Pub SG01-11.
30. Letcher, B. H., and T. L. King 1999. Targeted stock identification using multilocus genotype 'familyprinting'. Fisheries Research 43:99-111.
31. Levitan, D. R. 2005. The distribution of male and female reproductive success in a broadcast spawning marine invertebrate. Integrative and Comparative Biology 45:848-855.
32. Lorenzen, K., K. M. Leber, and H. L. Blankenship 2010. Responsible approach to stock enhancement: an update. Reviews in Fisheries Science 18:189-210.
33. McEachron, L. W., C. W. McCarty, and R. R. Vega 1993. Successful enhancement of Texas red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) population. In Interactions between Cultured Species and Naturally Occurring Species in the Environment: Proceedings of the 22nd U.S.-Japan Aquaculture Panel Symposium, Homer. pp. 53-56.
34. Michalczyk, Ł., A. L. Millard, O. Y. Martin, A. J. Lumley, B. C. Emerson, T. Chapman, and M. J. G. Gage 2011. Inbreeding promotes female promiscuity. Science 333:1739-1742.
35. Moser, H. G., D. A. Ambrose, M. S. Busby, J. L. Butler, E. M. Sandknop, B. Y. Sumida, and E. G. Stevens 1983. Description of early stages of white seabass, Atractoscion nobilis, with notes on distribution. CalCOFI Report 24:182-193.
36. Nunney, L. 1993. The influence of mating system and overlapping generations on effective population size. Evolution 47:1329-1341.
37. Oliver, J., and R. Babcock 1992. Aspects of the fertilization ecology of broadcast spawning corals: sperm dilution and measurements of fertilization. Biological Bulletin 183:409-417.
38. Pearse, D. E., R. J. Janzen, and J. C. Avise 2001. Multiple paternity, sperm storage, and reproductive success of female and male painted turtles (Chrysemys picta) in nature. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 51:164-171.
39. Pella, J. J., and G. B. Milner 1987. Use of genetic marks in stock composition analysis. In N. Ryman, and F. Utter, eds. Population Genetic and Fisheries Management. pp. 247-276. University of Washington Press, Seattle.
40. Pennington, J. T. 1985. The ecology of fertilization of echinoid eggs - the consequences of sperm dilution, adult aggregation and synchronous spawning. Biological Bulletin 169:417-430.
41. Reisenbichler, R., S. Rubin, L. Wetzel, and S. Phelps 2004. Natural selection after release from a hatchery leads to domestication in steelhead, Oncorhynchus mykiss. In K. M. Leber, S. Kitada, H. L. Blankenship, and T. Svåsand, eds. Stock Enhancement and Sea Ranching: Developments, Pitfalls and Opportunities, 2nd edn, pp. 371-383. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford.
42. Rousset, F. 2008. GENEPOP'007: a complete re-implementation of the GENEPOP software for Windows and Linux. Molecular Ecology Resources 8:103-106.
43. Rowe, S., and J. A. Hutchings 2003. Mating systems and the conservation of commercially exploited marine fish. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18:567-572.
44. Rowe, S., and J. A. Hutchings 2008. A link between sound producing musculature and mating success in Atlantic cod. Journal of Fish Biology 72:500-511.
45. Rowe, S., J. A. Hutchings, and J. E. Skjæraasen 2007. Nonrandom mating in a broadcast spawner: mate size influences reproductive success in Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 64:219-226.
46. Ryman, N., and L. Laikre 1991. Effects of supportive breeding on the genetically effective population size. Conservation Biology 5:325-329.
47. Ryman, N., F. Utter, and L. Laikre 1995. Protection of intraspecific biodiversity of exploited fishes. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 5:417-446.
48. Schmeller, D. S., and J. Merilä 2007. Demographic and genetic estimates of effective population and breeding size in the amphibian Rana temporaria. Conservation Biology 21:142-151.
49. Smith, T. I. J., W. E. Jenkins, M. R. Denson, and M. R. Collins 2003. Stock enhancement research with anadromous and marine fishes in South Carolina. UJNR Technical Report 30:175-189.
50. Stockley, P., M. J. G. Gage, G. A. Parker, and A. P. Møller 1997. Sperm competition in fishes: the evolution of testis size and ejaculate characteristics. The American Naturalist 149:933-954.
51. Taborsky, M. 1998. Sperm competition in fish: 'bourgeois' males and parasitic spawning. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13:222-227.
52. Taniguchi, N. 2003. Genetic factors in broodstock management for seed production. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 13:177-185.
53. Taniguchi, N. 2004. Broodstock management for stock enhancement programs of marine fish with assistance of DNA marker (a review). In K. M. Leber, S. Kitada, H. L. Blankenship, and T. Svåsand, eds. Stock Enhancement and Sea Ranching: Developments, Pitfalls and Opportunities, 2nd edn. pp. 329-338. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford.
54. Thrower, F. P., and J. E. Joyce 2004. Effects of 70years of freshwater residency on survival, growth, early maturation, and smolting in a stock of anadromous rainbow trout from southeast Alaska. American Fisheries Society Symposium 44:485-496.
55. Tringali, M. D., and T. M. Bert 1998. Risk to genetic effective population size should be an important consideration in fish stock-enhancement programs. Bulletin of Marine Science 62:641-659.
56. Tringali, M. D., T. M. Bert, F. Cross, J. W. Dodrill, L. M. Gregg, W. G. Halstead, R. A. Krause et al. 2007. Genetic Policy for the Release of Finfishes in Florida. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. Florida Fish and Wildlife Research Institute, Publication No. IHR-2007-1, St. Petersburg.
57. Tringali, M. D., K. M. Leber, W. G. Halstead, R. McMichael, J. O'Hop, B. Winner, R. Cody et al. 2008. Marine stock enhancement in Florida: a multi-disciplinary, stakeholder-supported, accountability-based approach. Reviews in Fisheries Science 16:51-57.
58. Turner, J. F., J. P. Wares, and J. R. Gold 2002. Genetic effective size is three orders of magnitude smaller than adult census size in an abundant, estuarine-depended marine fish (Sciaenops ocellatus). Genetics 162:1329-1339.
59. Waples, R. S. 1990. Conservation genetics of Pacific salmon. II. Effective population size and the rate of loss of genetic variability. Journal of Heredity 81:267-276.
60. Waples, R. S. 1994. Genetic considerations in recovery efforts for Pacific salmon. Conservation Biology 8:884-886.
61. Waples, R. S.. 2006. A bias correction for estimates of effective population size based on linkage disequilibrium at unlinked gene loci*. Conservation Genetics 7:167-184.
62. Waples, R. S., and C. Do 2008. LDNE: a program for estimating effective population size from data on linkage disequilibrium. Molecular Ecology Resources 8:753-756.
63. Waples, R. S., and K. A. Naish 2009. Genetic and evolutionary considerations in fishery management: research needs for the future. In J. Beamish, and B. J. Rothschild, eds. The Future of Fisheries Science in North America. pp. 427-451. Springer, Dordrecht.