Marine stock enhancement in Florida: A multi-disciplinary, stakeholder-supported, accountability-based approach

Reviews in Fisheries Science

Volumn 16, Issue 1-3, 2008, Pages 51-57

  Tringali, Michael D ^a   Leber, Kenneth M ^b   Halstead, William G ^a   McMichael, Robert ^a   O'Hop, Joseph ^a   Winner, Brent ^a   Cody, Richard ^a   Young, Chris ^a   Neidig, Carole ^b   Wolfe, Heather ^a   Forstchen, Ann ^a   Barbieri, Luiz ^a  

^a FISH AND WILDLIFE RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b MOTE MARINE LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptive management; Genetic identification; Red drum; Sciaenops ocellatus

Indexed keywords

SCIAENOPS; SCIAENOPS OCELLATUS;

EID: 40249084938     PISSN: 10641262     EISSN: 15476553     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10641260701776902     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. American Sportfishing Association (ASA), Sales and Economic Trends, http://www.asafishing.org/asa/statistics/saleco_trends/(2006).
2. Bert, T. M. et al. Evaluating stock enhancement strategies: A multi-disciplinary approach. Ecology of Aquaculture Species and Enhancement of Stocks, Proceedings of the Thirtieth U.S-Japan Meeting on Aquaculture, Sarasota, FL, p. 105-126 (2003).
3. Blankenship, H. L., and K. M. Leber. A responsible approach to marine stock enhancement. In: Uses and Effects of Cultured Fishes in Aquatic Ecosystems, pp. 167-175 (H. L. Schramm, Jr. and R. G. Piper, Eds.). American Fisheries Society, Symposium 15, Bethesda, MD (1995).
4. Hilborn, R., and C. J. Walters. Quantitative Fisheries Stock Assessment, New York and London: Chapman and Hall (1992).
5. Leber, K. M. Rationale for an experimental approach to stock enhancement. In: Stock Enhancement and Sea Ranching, pp. 493-508 (B. R. Howell, E. Moksness, and T. Svasand, Eds.). Oxford: Fishing News Books (1999).
6. Leber, K. M. Advances in marine stock enhancement: Shifting emphasis to theory and accountability. In: Responsible Marine Aquaculture, pp. 79-90 (R. R. Strickney and J. P. McVey, Eds.). New York: CABI Publishing (2002).
7. Lorenzen, K. Understanding and managing enhancement fisheries systems. Rev. Fish. Sci., 16: 10-23 (2008).
8. McMichael, R. H., Jr. Fisheries independent monitoring program operating procedure manual. Report No. IHR2000-05. Florida Fish and Wildlife Research Institute, St. Petersburg, FL 256 pp. (2000).
9. Miami Herald. Redfish rebound. February 19, 1999.
10. Neidig, C. L., D. P. Skapura, H. J. Grier, and C. W. Dennis. Techniques for spawning common snook: Broodstock handling, oocyte staging, and egg quality. N. Am. J. Aquacult., 62: 103-113 (2000).
11. Peters, K. M., and R. H. McMichael, Jr. Early life history of the red drum, Sciaenops ocellatus (Pisces: Sciaenidae) in Tampa Bay Florida. Estuaries. 10: 92-107 (1987).
12. Serafy, J. E., J. S. Ault, T. R. Capo, and D. R. Schultz. Red drum, Sciaenops ocellatus, stock enhancement in Biscayne Bay, FL, USA: Assessment of releasing unmarked early juveniles. Aquacult. Res., 30: 737-750 (1999).
13. Tringali, M. D. A Bayesian approach for the genetic tracking of cultured and released individuals. Fish. Res., 77: 159-172 (2006).
14. Tringali, M. D. et al. Genetic Policy for the Release of Finfishes in Florida. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, March 2007. Florida Fish and Wildlife Research Institute Publication No. IHR-2007-1.
15. Wickstrom, K. Biscayne redfish: yes! Florida Sportsman Magazine, (March): 90-91 (1993).
16. Willis, S. A., W. W. Falls, C. W. Dennis, D. E. Roberts, and P. G. Whitchurch. Assessment of season of release and size at release on recapture rates of hatchery-reared red drum {Sciaenops ocellatus) in a marine stock enhancement program in Florida. In: Uses and Effects of Cultured Fishes in Aquatic Ecosystems, pp. 354-365 (H. L. Schramm, Jr., and R. G. Piper, Eds.). American Fisheries Society, Symposium 15, Bethesda, MD (1995).