An approach to leak detection using wireless sensor networks at carbon sequestration sites

International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control

Volumn 9, Issue , 2012, Pages 243-253

  Weimer, James ^a   Krogh, Bruce H ^a   Small, Mitchel J ^a   Sinopoli, Bruno ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Leak detection; Wireless senor network

Indexed keywords

ALARM SYSTEMS; CARBON; CARBON DIOXIDE; DYNAMIC MODELS; ERRORS; LEAK DETECTION; PROBABILITY;

ADVECTION - DIFFUSION; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; LINEAR DYNAMIC MODEL; PROBABILITY OF FALSE ALARM; PROOF OF CONCEPT; SEQUENTIAL PROBABILITY RATIO TEST; TRANSPORT MODELING; WIRELESS SENOR NETWORK;

WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS;

ADVECTION; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; DIFFUSION; MONITORING SYSTEM; NUMERICAL MODEL; PROBABILITY; SENSOR;

EID: 84860296734     PISSN: 17505836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Cimorelli A.J., Perry S.G., Venkatram A., Weil J.C., Paine R.J., Wilson R.B., Lee R.F., Peters W.D., Brode R.W. Aermod: A dispersion model for industrial source applications. part i: general model formulation and boundary layer characterization. Journal of Applied Meteorology 2005, 44(5):682-693.
2. Eswaran, A., Rowe, A., Rajkumar, R., 2005. Nano-RK: an energy-aware resource-centric rtos for sensor networks. In: Real-Time Systems Symposium, 2005. RTSS 2005. 26th IEEE International, pp. 10-265. doi:10.1109/RTSS.2005.30.
3. Fatehifar E., Elkamel A., Taheri M. A MATLAB-Based modeling and simulation program for dispersion of multi-pollutants from an industrial stack for the educational use in a course on air pollution control. Computer Applications in Engineering Education 2006, 14(4):300-312.
4. Revision to the guideline on air quality models: adoption of a preferred general purpose (flat and complex terrain) dispersion model and other revisions, final rule. Federal Register 40.
5. Fox, E.B., Fisher, J.W., Willsky, A.S., 2007. Detection and localization of material releases with sparse sensor configurations. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 55(May (5)), 1886-1898. doi:10.1109/TSP.2006.890914 [see also IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing].
6. Heinsohn R., Kabel R. Sources and Control of Air Pollution 1999, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
7. Hernandez E., Martan F., Valero F. State-space modeling for atmospheric pollution. Journal of Applied Meteorology 1991, 30(6):793-811.
8. Kailath T., Fellow L., Poor H.V. Detection of stochastic processes. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 1998, 44:2230-2259.
9. Larcher W. Physiological Plant Ecology 1995, Springer, New York.
10. Mangharam, R., Rowe, A., Rajkumar, R., 2007. Firefly: a cross-layer platform for real-time embedded wireless networks. Real-Time Systems, 37(3), 183-231. doi:10.1007/s11241-007-9028-z.
11. Melman, A., 1997. Geometry and convergence of Euler's and Halley's methods. In: SIAM Review, vol. 39. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, pp. 728-735.
12. Rao K.S. E. R. L. (U.S.), Plume Concentration Algorithms with Deposition, Sedimentation, and Chemical Transformation [Microform] 1983, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Environmental Research Laboratories, Washington, DC.
13. Rowe A., Lakshmanan K., Rajkumar R. Sample: a simple aggregation and message passing layer. Real-Time Systems Symposium 2008.
14. Saripalli P., Amonette J., Rutz F., Gupta N. Design of sensor networks for long term monitoring of geological sequestration. Energy Conversion and Management 2006, 47(13-14):1968-1974.
15. Seinfeld J.H., Pandis S.N. Atmoshperic Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change 1998, John Wiley and Sons Inc, New York.
16. Sharan M., Yadav A.K. Simulation of diffusion experiments under light wind, stable conditions by a variable k-theory model. Atmospheric Environment 1998, 32(20):3481-3492.
17. Sharan M., Yadav A.K., Singh M.P., Agarwal P., Nigam S. A mathematical model for the dispersion of air pollutants in low wind conditions. Atmospheric Environment 1996, 30(8):1209-1220.
18. Smith W.H. Air Pollution and Forests: Interaction between Air Contaminants and Forest Ecosystems 1981, Springer-Verlag, New York.
19. Srivastava, V., Plarre, K., Bullo, F., 2009. Randomized sensor selection in sequential hypothesis testing. Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/0909.1801.
20. Tannehill J., Anderson D., Pletcher R. Computational Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer, Series in Computational and Physical Processes in Mechanics and Thermal Sciences 1997, Taylor & Francis.
21. Turner D. Workbook of Atmospheric Dispersion Estimates: An Introduction to Dispersion Modeling 1994, CRC Press. 2nd edition.
22. United States Secretary of Energy Steven Chu, 2009. Letter on carbon capture and sequestration.
23. Wald A. Sequential Analysis 1947, John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York.
24. Weimer, J., Sinopoli, B., Krogh, B., 2008. A relaxation approach to dynamic sensor selection in large-scale wireless networks. In: Distributed Computing Systems Workshops, 2008. 28th International Conference on ICDCS '08, pp. 501-506. doi:10.1109/ICDCS.Workshops.2008.82.
25. Weimer J., Sinopoli B., Krogh B. Large-scale source localization with a wireless sensor network application. 18th International Federation on Automatic Control (IFAC) World Congress 2011.
26. Weimer, J.E., 2010. Large-scale multiple-source detection using wireless sensor networks. Ph.D. Thesis.
27. Wells, A., Hammack, R., Veloski, G., Diehl, J., Strazisar, B., 2006. Monitoring, mitigation, and verification at sequestration sides: sequre technologies and the challenge for geophysical detection. Tech. Rep., NETL, Pittsburgh, PA.
28. Willsky A. A survey of design methods for failure detection in dynamic systems. Automatica 1976, 12:601-611.
29. 2 flux and leak detection at geologic sequestration sites. Environmental Earth Sciences 2011, 64:787-798.
30. 2 leak detection system. Environmental Science and Technology 2011, 45(15):6380-6387.