A relaxation approach to dynamic sensor selection in large-scale wireless networks

Proceedings - International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 501-506

  Weimer, James E ^a   Sinopoli, Bruno ^a   Krogh, Bruce H ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHLORINE COMPOUNDS; COMBINATORIAL MATHEMATICS; COMBINATORIAL OPTIMIZATION; COMPUTER SYSTEMS; CONTROL THEORY; COVARIANCE MATRIX; DATA STRUCTURES; DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; ENERGY POLICY; ESTIMATION; HYBRID SENSORS; SENSOR NETWORKS; SENSORS; STANDARDS; STATE ESTIMATION; TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; WIRELESS NETWORKS;

BANDWIDTH CONSTRAINTS; COMBINATORIAL OP-TIMIZATION PROBLEM; DISCRETE-TIME; DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING SYSTEMS; DISTRIBUTED NETWORKS; DISTRIBUTED STATE ESTIMATION; DYNAMIC SENSORS; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; ERROR COVARIANCE MATRIX; ESTIMATION PERFORMANCE; INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES; LARGE-SCALE SENSOR NETWORKS; OF SENSORS; OPTIMAL STATE ESTIMATION; SENSOR SELECTION; TIME STEPPING; TRANSMISSION RANGES;

WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS;

EID: 51849090140     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICDCS.Workshops.2008.82     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. A. Alonso, I. Keverekidis, J. Banga, and C. Frouzakis. Optimal sensor location and reduced order observer design for distributed process systems. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 28:27-35, 2004.
2. J. Apt, L. Gresham, M. Morgan, and A. Newcomer. Incentives for near-term carbon dioxide geological sequestration. Technical report, EPP Dept., Carnegie Mellon University, October 2007.
3. S. Boyd and L. Vandenberghe. Convex Optimization. Cambridge University Press, 2004.
4. A. K. Datta. Biological and bioenvironmental heat and mass transfer. marcel dekker, inc., 2002.
5. M. A. Demetriou. Process estimation and moving source detection in 2-d diffusion processes by scheduling of sensor networks. American Control Conference, 2007. ACC '07, pages 3432-3437, 9-13 July 2007.
6. E. Ertin, J. Fisher, and L. Potter. Maximum mutual information principle for dynamic sensor query problems. In IPSN, pages 405-416. Springer-Verlag, 2003.
7. Z. Feng, K. Teo, and Y. Zhao. Branch and bound method for sensor scheduling in discrete time. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 1(4):499-512, November 2005.
8. V. Gupta, T. Chung, H. Babak, and R. Murray. On a stochastic sensor selection algorithm with applications in sensor scheduling and sensor coverage. Automatica, 42:251-260, Feb 2006.
9. V. Gupta, T. Chung, B. Hassibi, and R. Murray. On a stochastic algorithm for sensor scheduling. In IFAC, 2005.
10. J.Bay. Fundamentals of Linear State Space Systems. McGraw-Hill, 1998.
11. J. Liu, J. Reich, and F. Zhao. Collaborative in-network processing for target tracking. Journal on Applied Signal Processing, 4:378-391.
12. Matlab and Simulnk. www.mathworks.com.
13. Y. Oshman. Optimal sensor selection strategy for discrete-time state estimators. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 30(2):307-314, April 1994.
14. C. Phillips and H. Nagle. Digital Control System Analysis and Design. Prentice Hall, 1995.
15. H. Rowaihy, S. Eswaran, M. Johnson, D. Verma, A. Bar-Noy, T. Brown, and T. L. Porta. A survey of sensor selection schemes in wireless sensor networks. Technical report, Pennsylvania State University, March 2007.
16. S. Simons. 79.3 approximate matrix inversion. The Mathematical Gazette, 79(484):91-92, mar 1995.
17. D. Tylavsky and G. Sohie. Generalization of the matrix inversion lemma. In Proceeding of the IEEE, volume 74, pages 1050-1052, July 1986.
18. A. Wells, R. Hammack, G. Veloski, J. Diehl, and B. Strazisar. Monitoring, mitigation, and verification at sequestration sides: Sequre technologies and the challenge for geophysical detection. Technical report, NETL., Pittsburgh, PA, October 2006.