An empirical methodology for human integration in the SE technical processes

Systems Engineering

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 172-190

  Hardman, Nicholas ^a   Colombi, John ^b  

^a Aeronautical Systems Center   (United States)

^b Air Force Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

function allocation; human performance modeling; human systems integration; requirements elicitation; user interface design

Indexed keywords

CRITICAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT; HUMAN CONSIDERATIONS; HUMAN PERFORMANCE MODELING; HUMAN SUBJECTS; HUMAN SYSTEMS INTEGRATION; QUANTITATIVE METHOD; REQUIREMENTS ELICITATION; SYSTEM LIFECYCLE; SYSTEMS ENGINEERS; TECHNICAL PROCESS; USER INTERFACE DESIGNS;

USER INTERFACES;

REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING;

EID: 84860288298     PISSN: 10981241     EISSN: 15206858     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sys.20201     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. AFSC, USAF aviation safety year in review FY2006, Briefing, Air Force Safety Center, Kirkland AFB, NM, 2007.
2. AFSC, USAF aviation safety year in review FY2008, Briefing, Air Force Safety Center, Kirkland AFB, NM, 2009.
3. R. Albert, H. Jeong, and, A. Barabasi, Diameter of the World Wide Web, Nature 130 (1999), 130.
4. L. Andre, and, M. Kukura, See and avoid, 2009, retrieved September 2009.
5. J.W. Andrews, Air-to-air visual acquisition handbook, Project Rep ATC-151, Lincoln Laboratories, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Lexington, MA, 1991.
6. W.S. Bainbridge, (Editor), Berkshire encyclopedia of human-computer interaction, Berkshire Pub. Group, Great Barrington, MA, 2004.
7. A. Baker, and, M.M. Grynbaum, Airspace above Hudson: A highway with few signs, The New York Times (August 10, 2009), 1.
8. BASI, Limitations of the see-and-avoid principle, Civil Aviation Authority, Sydney, Australia, 1991.
9. R.G Bias, and, D.J. Mayhew, (Editors), Cost-justifying usability: An update for an Internet age, Morgan Kaufman, Boston, 2005.
10. A. Bisantz, and, C. Burns, Applications of cognitive work analysis, CRC Press, Boston, 2009.
11. B.S. Blanchard, and, W.J. Fabrycky, Systems engineering and analysis, 4th edition, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2006.
12. H.R. Booher, (Editor), Handbook of human systems integration, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2003.
13. J. Bowman, Interview, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH, 2009.
14. J. Burns, J. Gordon, M. Wilson, M. Stretton, and, D. Bowdler, A framework for applying HSI tools in systems acquisition, Interservice/Indust Train Simulation Ed Conf, Orlando, FL, 2005.
15. G. Calhoun, E. Herron, J. Reising, and, R. Bateman, Evaluation of factors unique to multifunction controls/displays devices, Tech Rep 80-3131, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH, 1980.
16. S. Card, T. Moran, and, A. Newell, The psychology of human-computer interaction, Hum Comput Interaction 2 (1983), 227-249.
17. Consumer Reports, Safer sleeping, 2008, retrieved February 1, 2011.
18. R. Deininger, Human factors studies of the design and use of push-button telephone keysets, Bell Syst Tech J 39 (1960), 995-1012.
19. S. Dekker, Ten questions about human error: A new view of human factors and system safety, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 2004.
20. S. Dekker, The field guide to understanding human error, Ashgate, Burlington, VT, 2006.
21. DoD, MIL-HDBK-759C: Human engineering design guidelines, US Department of Defense, Washington, DC, 1998.
22. DoD, Risk management guide for DoD acquisition, 6th edition, US Department of Defense, Washington, DC, 2006.
23. DoD, DoD Instruction 5000.02: Operation of the defense acquisition system, US Department of Defense, Washington, DC, 2008a.
24. DoD, MIL-STD-882D, US Department of Defense, Washington, DC, 2008b.
25. DoD, DoD Instruction 60057: Mishap notification, investigation, reporting, and record keeping, US Department of Defense, Washington, 2011.
26. S. Dray, The importance of designing usable systems, Interactions 2 (1995), 17-20.
27. K. S. Eamonn, Focus of attention and pilot error, Proc Symp Eye Track Res Appl, 2004.
28. FAA, System safety handbook, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC, 2000.
29. F. Fiorino, Fighting human error, Aviation Week Space Technol 165 (22) (2006), 47-49. (Pubitemid 44886136)
30. G. Francis, A software tool for the design of multifunction displays, ARL Report No. 99-20, Army Research Laboratory, Ft. Rucker, AL, 1999.
31. GAO, Assessments of selected major weapon programs, GAO-05-301, US Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC, 2005.
32. D. Graeber, and, M. Snow, Interview with Boeing phantomworks engineers, Seattle, WA, 2008.
33. N.S. Hardman, Approaches for autonomous vehicles in civil airspace: Giving sight to the blind, Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 2006.
34. N.S. Hardman, and, J.M. Colombi, A mapping from the DoD human error taxonomy codes to the domains of human systems integration, Technical Report No. AFIT/EN/TR-09-04, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH, 2009.
35. N.S. Hardman, and, J.M. Colombi, D.R. Jacques, and, R.R. Hill, Improved user interface design through graph-theoretic modeling, Trans IEEE Int Conf Distributed Hum Machine Syst, 2008.
36. N.S. Hardman, and, J.M. Colombi, D.R. Jacques, R.R. Hill, and, J.E. Miller, Application of a seeded hybrid genetic algorithm for user interface design, Trans IEEE Int Conf SMC, San Antonio, TX, 2009.
37. D. Harris, and, H.C. Muir, (Editors), Contemporary issues in human factors and aviation safety, Ashgate, Aldershot, UK, 2005.
38. E. Herron, Two types of system control with an interactive display device, Soc Inform Display Dig, 1978, pp. 84-85.
39. W.E Hick, On the rate of gain of information, Quart J Exper Psychol 4 (1952), 11-26.
40. W. Horrey, and, C.D. Wickens, Driving and side task performance: The effects of display clutter, separation, and modality, Hum Factors 46 (4) (2004), 611-624. (Pubitemid 40179359)
41. R. Hyman, Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time, J Exper Psychol 45 (1953), 188-196.
42. S. Iglin, Graph theory toolbox posted in MATLAB central, retrieved August 3, 2007.
43. INCOSE, Systems engineering handbook: A guide for system life cycle processes and activities (version. 3.2), International Council on Systems Engineering, Seattle, WA, 2010.
44. G.V. Jean, Unmanned systems could fly majority of air force missions, Natl Defense 93 (2009), 34.
45. C. Johnson, Why human error modeling has failed to help systems development, Interact Comput 11 (5) (1999), 517-524.
46. D. Kieras, "Model-based evaluation," Human-computer interaction handbook, A. Sears, and, J. Jacko, (Editors), Taylor & Francis, New York, 2004.
47. W. Li, Pilot error and its relationship with higher organizational levels: HFACS analysis of 523 accidents, Aviation Space Environ Med 77 (10) (2006), 1056-1061. (Pubitemid 44571723)
48. S. Lindlaw, Drones' big enemy is human mistakes, Arizona Daily Star (August 26, 2008), 1.
49. B. Liu, G. Francis, and, G. Salvendy, Applying models of visual search to menu design, Int J Hum Comput Stud 56 (3) (2002), 307-330.
50. Lockheed Martin, F-35 cockpit (proposed), Code One, Palmdale, CA, 2006.
51. T.B. Malone, and, F. Carson, HSI top down requirements analysis, Nav Eng J 115 (2003), 37-48.
52. D.J. Mayhew, The usability engineering lifecycle: A practitioner's handbook for user interface design, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, 1999.
53. M. Mueller,. Interview. Air Force Center of Systems Engineering. Wright-Patterson AFB, OH, 2009.
54. J. Murray, and, J. Reising, Tailoring software logic to the needs of the pilot: A software designer's nightmare, IEEE Proc Natl Aerospace Electron Conf, 1980. pp. 1052-1056. (Pubitemid 11439828)
55. NASA, Systems engineering handbook (Rev. 1), NASA/SP-2007-6105, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC, 2007.
56. NDIA, Top five systems engineering issues in defense industry, Task Group Report, National Defense Industrial Association, Arlington, VA, 2003.
57. NTSB, Collision of two Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority metrorail trains near Fort Totten Station, Report NTSB/RAR-10/02, National Transportation Safety Board, Washington, DC, 2009.
58. D.A. Norman, The design of future things, Basic Books, Jackson, TN, 2007.
59. R.W. Pew, and, A.S. Mavor, (Editors), Human-system integration in the system development process, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 2007.
60. C.A. Phillips, Human factors engineering, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2000.
61. M. Puterman, Markov decision processes: Discrete stochastic dynamic programming, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 1994.
62. J. Reason, Human error, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1990.
63. J. Reason, Managing the risks of organizational accidents, Ashgate, Aldershot, UK, 1997.
64. J.M. Reising, and, D.G. Curry, A comparison of voice and multifunction controls: Logic design is the key, Ergonomics 30 (7) (1987), 1063-1077.
65. J.M. Reising, G.L. Calhoun, and, D.G. Curry, Interview, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH, 2009.
66. A. Sage, and, W.B. Rouse, (Editors), Handbook of systems engineering and management, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 1999.
67. G. Salvendy, (Editor), Handbook of human factors and ergonomics, 3rd edition, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2006.
68. T. Saunders, System-of-systems engineering for air force capability development, Technical Report No. SAB-TR-05-04, USAF Scientific Advisory Board, Washington, DC, 2005.
69. M.W. Scerbo, "Theoretical perspective on adaptive automation," Automation and human performance: Theory and applications, R. Parasuraman, and, M. Mouloua, (Editors), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 1996. pp. 37-63.
70. R.W. Schvaneveldt, D.B. Beringer, and, J.A. Lamonica, Priority and organization of information accessed by pilots in various phases of flight, Int J Aviation Psychol 11 (3) (2001), 253-280.
71. S.C. Seow, Information theoretic models of HCI: A comparison of the Hick-Hyman law and Fitts' law, Hum Comput Interaction 20 (3) (2005), 315-352. (Pubitemid 43056999)
72. S.A. Shappell, and, D.A. Wiegmann, A human error analysis of general aviation controlled flight into terrain accidents occurring between 1990-1998, No. ADA417230, Federal, Aviation Agency, Oklahoma City, 2003.
73. S.A. Shappell, C. Detwiler, K. Holcomb, C. Hackworth, and, D.A. Wiegmann, Human error and commercial aviation accidents: An analysis using the human factors analysis and classification system, Hum Factors 49 (2) (2007), 227-242. (Pubitemid 46493594)
74. B. Shneiderman, and, C. Plaisant, Designing the user interface, 4th edition, Addison-Wesley, Boston, 2005.
75. W.J. Smith, Modern optical engineering, 3rd edition, McGraw-Hill Professional, Boston, 2000.
76. Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE), Aerospace recommended practice ARP5580: Recommended failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) practices for non-automobile applications, Warrendale, PA, 2000.
77. N.A. Stanton, P.M. Salmon, G.H. Walker, C. Baber, and, D.P. Jenkins, Human factors methods: A practical guide for engineering and design, Ashgate, Burlington, VT, 2005.
78. N.A. Stanton, D. Harris, P.M. Salmon, J.M. Demagalski, A. Marshall, and, M.S. Young, Predicting design induced pilot error using HET (human error template): A new formal human error identification method for flight decks, Aeronaut J 110 (1104) (2006), 107-115.
79. W.T. Thompson, A.P. Tvaryanas, and, S.H. Constable, U.S. military unmanned aerial vehicle mishaps: Assessment of the role of human factors using HFACS, 311th Performance Enhancement Directorate, US Air Force, Brooks City-Base, TX, 2005.
80. A.P. Tvaryanas, Human factors considerations in migration of unmanned aircraft system (UAS) operator control AD-A444925, NASA Center for Aerospace Information, Hanover, MD, 2006a.
81. A.P. Tvaryanas, Human systems integration in remotely piloted aircraft operations, Aviation Space Environ Med 77 (12) (2006b), 1278-1282. (Pubitemid 44893781)
82. USAF Studies Board, Pre-milestone A and early-phase systems engineering: A retrospective review and benefits for future air force systems acquisition, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2008.
83. USAF, Air Force Instruction No. AFI 16-401, Safety investigations and reports, Office of the Secretary of the Air Force, Washington, DC, 2005.
84. USAF, Air Force Instruction No. AFI 91-204, Safety investigations and reports, Office of the Secretary of the Air Force, Washington, DC, 2006.
85. USAF, Air Force Instruction No. AFI 91-301, Safety investigations and reports, Office of the Secretary of the Air Force, Washington, DC, 2009.
86. USAF HSI Office, Briefing to the Secretary of the Air Force, Arlington, VA, 2008.
87. US Army, Army Instruction No. AR-70-50, Office of the Secretary of the Army, Washington, DC, 2005.
88. US Navy, Navy Instruction No. NAVAIRINST 13100.16, Office of the Secretary of the Navy, Washington, DC, 2005.
89. G. Warwick, Remote chance, Flight Int (April 27, 2004), 1.
90. D.B. West, Introduction to graph theory, 2nd edition, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2001.
91. D.A Wiegmann, and, S.A. Shappell, Human error analysis of commercial aviation accidents: Application of the human factors analysis and classification system (HFACS), Aviation Space Environ Med 72 (11) (2001), 1006-1016. (Pubitemid 33032188)
92. D.A. Wiegmann, and, S.A. Shappell, A human error analysis of commercial aviation accidents using HFACS, Technical No. DOT/FAA/AM-01/3, Office of Aviation Medicine, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC, 2003a.
93. D.A Wiegmann, and, S.A. Shappell, A human error approach to aviation accident analysis, Ashgate, Burlington, VT, 2003b.
94. K.W. Williams, Human factors implications of unmanned aircraft accidents: Flight-control problems, Technical No. ADA460892, Federal Aviation Administration, Oklahoma City, OH, 2006.
95. J.R. Wirthlin,. Interview. Wright-Patterson AFB, OH, 2009.