Applying models of visual search to menu design

International Journal of Human Computer Studies

Volumn 56, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 307-330

  Liu, Baili ^a   Francis, Gregory ^b   Salvendy, Gavriel ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON BOTHELL   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SCHOOL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING   (United States)

^d TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Human computer interaction; Menu search; Visual search

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

GUIDED SEARCH (GS) MODELS;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 0036523486     PISSN: 10715819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/ijhc.2002.0527     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Aarts, E. & Korst, J. (1989). Simulated Annealing and Boltzmann Machines. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
2. Armstrong Laboratory Human Engineering Division. (1994). User's Guide: Computer Aided Systems Human Engineering Performance Visualization System (CASHEPVS), Version 1.0 for Apple Macintosh. Wright-Patterson AFB.
3. Cave, K.R. & Wolfe, J.M. (1990). Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 225-271.
4. Fitts, P.M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 381-391.
5. Francis, G. (2000). Design multifunction displays: An optimization approach. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 4, 107-125.
6. Hornof, A.J. & Kieras, D.E. (1997). Cognitive modeling reveals menu search is both random and systematic. Proceedings of ACM CHI 97: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 107-114. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
7. Hornof, A.J. & Kieras, D.E. (1999). Cognitive modeling demonstrates how people use anticipated location knowledge of menu options. Proceedings of ACM CHI 99: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
8. Howes, A. & Payne, S.J. (1990). Display-based competence - Towards user models for menu-driven interfaces. International Journal of Man Machine Studies, 33, 637-655.
9. May, J., Tweedie, L., & Barnard, P.J. (1993). Modeling user performance in visually based interactions. In J.L. Alty, D. Diaper & S. Guest, Eds. People and Computers VIII, pp. 95-110. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Meyer, J. (2000). Performance with tables and graphs: effects of training and a visual search model. Ergonomics, 43, 1840-1865.
11. Norman, K.L. (1990). The Psychology of Menu Selection. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
12. Payne, S.J., Richardson, J. & Howes, A. (2000). Strategic use of familiarity in display-based problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, 26, 1685-1701.
13. Treisman, A.M. & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
14. Van Der Heijden, Malhas & Van Den Roovart (1984). An empirical interletter confusion matrix for continous-line capitals. Perception and Psychophysics, 35, 8548.
15. Wolfe, J.M. (1998). What can 1 million trials tell us about visual search? Psychological Science, 9, 33-39.
16. Wolfe, J.M. (1994). Guided search 2: a revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 202-238.
17. Wolfe, J.M. & Gancarz, G. (1996). Guided search 3.0: a model of visual search catches up with Jay Enoch 40 years later, in V. Lakshminarayanan, Ed. Basic and Clinical Application of Vision Science, pp. 189-192. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kiuwer Academic.