Creating socio-economic measures for community-based natural resource management: A case from watershed stewardship organisations

Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

Volumn 55, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 525-544

  Hibbard, Michael ^a   Lurie, Susan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

^b OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

community based natural resource management; new natural resource economy; socio economic metrics

Indexed keywords

ACTION RESEARCH; AGRICULTURE; NATURAL RESOURCE; RESOURCE ECONOMY; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; RURAL AREA; SOCIOECONOMIC IMPACT; SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS; SOCIOECONOMIC SURVEY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; WATERSHED;

OREGON; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84860266526     PISSN: 09640568     EISSN: 13600559     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2011.614093     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Agrawal, A. and Gibson, C. C. 1999. Enchantment and disenchantment: the role of community in natural resource conservation. World development, 27(4): 629-649.
2. Baker, M. and Kusel, J. 2003. Community forestry in the United States: learning from the past, crafting the future, Washington, DC: Island Press.
3. Bellamy, J. A. 2001. A systems approach to the evaluation of natural resource management initiatives. Journal of environmental management, 63: 407-423.
4. Beratan, K. K. 2004. Sustainability indicators as a communicative tool: building bridges in Pennsylvania. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 94(1-3): 179-191.
5. Bowen, R. E. and Riley, C. 2003. Socio-economic indicators and integrated coastal management. Ocean and coastal management, 46(3-4): 299-312.
6. Brick, P. and Weber, E. P. 2001. "Will rain follow the plow? Unearthing a new environmental movement". In Across the great divide: exploration in collaborative conservation and the American West, Edited by: Brick, P., Snow, D. and van de Wetering, S. 15-24. Washington, DC: Island Press.
7. Bridger, J. C. and Luloff, A. E. 1999. Toward an interactional approach to sustainable community development. Journal of rural studies, 15: 377-387.
8. Brosius, J. P., Tsing, A. L. and Zerner, C. 1998. Representing communities: histories and politics of community-based natural resource management. Society and natural resources, 11: 151-168.
9. Conley, A. and Moote, M. A. 2003. Evaluating collaborative natural resource management. Society and natural resources, 16(5): 371-386.
10. Cortner, H. and Moote, M. A. 1999. The politics of ecosystem management, Washington, DC: Island Press.
11. Daniels, S. E. and Walker, G. B. 2001. Working through environmental conflict: the collaborative learning approach, Westport, CT: Praeger.
12. Division for Sustainable Development. 2001. Indicators of sustainable development: guidelines and methodologies, New York: United Nations.
13. Epstein, P. D., Coates, P. M. and Wray, L. D. 2006. Results that matter: improving communities by engaging citizens, measuring performance, and getting things done, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14. Ericksen, N. 2004. Plan-making for sustainability: the New Zealand experience, Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
15. Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative inquiry, 12(2): 219-245.
16. Fraser, E. D.G. 2006. Bottom up and top down: analysis of participatory processes for sustainability indicator identification as a pathway to community empowerment and sustainable environmental management. Journal of environmental management, 78(2): 114-127.
17. Genskow, K. and Prokopy, L. 2010. Lessons learned in developing social indicators for regional water quality management. Society and natural resources, 23(1): 83-91.
18. Gray, B. 1989. Collaborating: finding common ground for multi-party problems, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
19. Gunton, T. 2003. Natural resources and regional development: an assessment of dependency and comparative advantage paradigms. Economic geography, 79(1): 67-94.
20. Guy, B. G. and Kibert, C. J. 1998. Developing indicators of sustainability: US experience. Building research and information,: 39-45.
21. Hayter, R. 2003. 'The war in the woods': Post-Fordist restructuring, globalization, and the contested remapping of British Columbia's forest economy. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 93(3): 706-729.
22. Hibbard, M. and Karle, K. 2002. Ecosystem restoration as community economic development? An assessment of the possibilities. Journal of the community development society, 33: 39-60.
23. Hibbard, M. and Lurie, S. 2006. Some community socio-economic benefits of watershed councils: a case study from Oregon. Journal of environmental planning and management, 49(6): 891-908.
24. Hibbard, M. and Tang, C-C. 2004. Sustainable community development: a social approach from Vietnam. Journal of the community development society, 35(2): 87-104.
25. Hibbard, M., Gurwitz, H. and Roark, T. 2009. A guide to developing socio-economic measures for Oregon's watershed councils, Eugene: University of Oregon Institute for Policy Research and Innovation.
26. Holmes, J. 2006. Impulses towards a multifunctional transition in rural Australia: gaps in the research agenda. Journal of rural studies, 22: 142-160.
27. Hyden, G. 1997. Civil society, social capital, and development: dissection of a complex discourse. Studies in comparative international development, 32: 3-30.
28. Igler, D. 2000. The industrial far West: region and nation in the late nineteenth century. Pacific historical review, 69(2): 159-192.
29. Innes, J. E. 1990. Knowledge and public policy: the search for meaningful indicators, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
30. Kemmis, D. 1990. Community and the politics of place, Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
31. Korten, D. 1992. Sustainable development. World policy journal, 9: 157-190.
32. Lane, M. and McDonald, G. 2005. Community-based environmental planning: operational dilemmas, planning principles and possible remedies. Journal of environmental planning and management, 48(5): 709-731.
33. Lele, S. 1991. Sustainable development: a critical review. World development, 19: 607-621.
34. Lurie, S. and Hibbard, M. 2008. Community based natural resource management: ideals and realities for Oregon watershed councils. Society and natural resources, 21(5): 430-440.
35. Margerum, R. D. and Whitall, D. 2004. The challenges and implications of collaborative management on a river basin scale. Journal of environmental planning and management, 47: 407-427.
36. McCarthy, J. 2005. Rural geography: multifunctional rural geographies-reactionary or radical?. Progress in human geography, 29(6): 773-782.
37. McCool, S. F. and Stankey, G. H. 2004. Indicators of sustainability: challenges and opportunities at the interface of science and policy. Environmental management,: 294-305.
38. Meter, K. A. 2007. "Linked indicators of sustainability build bridges of trust". In Sustainability and communities of place, Edited by: Maida, C. A. 183-200. New York: Berghahn Books.
39. Milon, J. W. and Shogren, J. F. 1995. Integrating economic and ecological indicators, Westport, CT: Praeger.
40. National Research Council. 2002. Community and quality of life: data needs for informed decision making, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
41. Nielsen-Pincus, M. and Moseley, C. 2010. Economic and employment impacts of forest and watershed restoration in Oregon, Eugene, OR: University of Oregon Institute for a Sustainable Environment;. Ecosystem Workforce Program Working Paper Number 24
42. OWEB, n.d. OWEB monitoring and reporting [online] Available from: http://www.oregon.gov/OWEB/MONITOR/OWEB_monitoring_reporting.shtml [Accessed 6 May 2011]
43. Phillips, R. 2005. Community indicators measuring systems, Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
44. Reed, M. G. and Bruyneel, S. 2010. Rescaling environmental governance, rethinking the state: a three-dimensional review. Progress in human geography, 34(5): 646-653.
45. Rydin, Y., Holman, N. and Wolff, E. 2003. Local sustainability indicators. Local environment, 8(6): 581-589.
46. Sabatier, P. 2005. Swimming upstream: collaborative approaches to watershed management, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47. Selman, P. 2001. Social capital, sustainability and environmental planning. Planning theory and practice, 2: 13-30.
48. Stoll, S. 1998. The fruits of natural advantage: making the industrial countryside in California, Berkeley: University of California Press.
49. Tyler Norris Associates, Redefining Progress, and Sustainable Seattle. 1997. The community indicators handbook: measuring progress toward healthy and sustainable communities, San Francisco: Redefining Progress.
50. von Hagen, B. and Fight, R. D. 1999. Opportunities for conservation-based development of non-timber forest products in the Pacific Northwest, General Technical Report PNW-GTR-473. Portland: USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
51. Weber, E. 2000. A new vanguard for the environment: grass-roots ecosystem management as a new environmental movement. Society and natural resources, 13: 237-259.
52. Weber, E. 2003. Bringing society back in: grassroots ecosystem management, accountability, and sustainable communities, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
53. Wilson, G. 2010. Multifunctional 'quality' and rural community resilience. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35: 364-381.
54. Wondolleck, J. M. and Yaffee, S. L. 2000. Making collaboration work: lessons from innovation in natural resource management, Washington, DC: Island Press.
55. World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our common future, New York: Oxford University Press.
56. Yanarella, E. J. and Levine, R. S. 1992. Does sustainable development lead to sustainability?. Futures, 24 October,: 759-774.