Mammogram retrieval on similar mass lesions

Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine

Volumn 106, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 234-248

  Wei, Chia Hung ^a   Chen, Sherry Y ^b   Liu, Xiaohui ^b  

^a CHING YUN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Content based image retrieval; Mammography

Indexed keywords

BREAST CANCER; BREAST SCREENING; CONTENT BASED IMAGE RETRIEVAL; CONTENT-BASED; DATA SETS; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAMS; DISTANCE MEASURE; MAMMOGRAPHIC; MAMMOGRAPHIC FEATURES; MASS LESION; MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS; RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS; SHAPE FEATURES; SIMILARITY MEASURE; ZERNIKE MOMENTS;

DATA PROCESSING; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; X RAY SCREENS;

MAMMOGRAPHY;

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTENT BASED IMAGE RETRIEVAL; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; HUMAN; IMAGE RETRIEVAL; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MAMMOGRAPHY; RADIOLOGIST; THERAPY EFFECT;

ALGORITHMS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; MAMMOGRAPHY; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED;

EID: 84860262395     PISSN: 01692607     EISSN: 18727565     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2010.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Beaver K., Witham G. Information needs of the informal carers of women treated for breast cancer. European Journal of Oncology Nursing 2007, 11(1):16-25.
2. Highnam R., Brady M. Mammographic Image Analysis 1999, Kluwer Academic Publishers, London.
3. Brodley C.E., Kak A., Dy J., Shyu C.R., Aisen A., Broderick L. Content-based retrieval from medical image database: a synergy of human interaction, machine learning, and computer vision. Proceedings of the Sixteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence 1999, 760-767.
4. Shyu C., Brodley C., Kak A., Kosaka A., Aisen A., Broderick L. ASSERT: a physician-in-the-loop content-based image retrieval system for HRCT image databases. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 1999, 75(1-2):111-132.
5. Antani S., Xu X., Long L.R., Thoma G.R. Partial shape matching for CBIR of spine X-ray images. Proceedings of IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging-Storage and Retrieval Methods and Applications for Multimedia 2004 2004, 1-8.
6. Antani S., Lee D.J., Long L.R., Thoma G.R. Evaluation of shape similarity measurement methods for spine X-ray images. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation 2004, 15(3):285-302.
7. Qi H., Snyder W.E. Content-based image retrieval in picture archiving and communications systems. Journal of Digital Imaging 1999, 12(2):81-82.
8. Kinoshita S., Azevedo-Marques P., Pereira R., Rodrigues J., Rangayyan R. Content-based retrieval of mammograms using visual features related to breast density patterns. Journal of Digital Imaging 2007, 20(2):172-190.
9. Alto H., Rangayyan R.M., Desautels J.E.L. Content-based retrieval and analysis of mammographic masses. Journal of Electronic Imaging 2005, 14(2):1-17.
10. Muramatsu C., Li Q., Schmidt R.A., Shiraishi J., Suzuki K., Newstead G.M., Doi K. Determination of subjective similarity for pairs of masses and pairs of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms: comparison of similarity ranking scores and absolute similarity ratings. Medical Physics 2007, 34(7):2890-2895.
11. American College of Radiology The ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 2003, American College of Radiology, Reston, VA. 4th ed.
12. Rangayyan R.M., Mudigonda N.R., Desautels J.E.L. Boundary modelling and shape analysis methods for classification of mammographic masses. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing 2000, 38(5):487-495.
13. Haralick R.M., Shanmugan K., Dinstein I. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 1973, 3(6):610-621.
14. Jin R., Meng B., Song E., Xu X., Jiang L. Computer-aided detection of mammographic masses based on content-based image retrieval. Proceedings of Medical Imaging 2007: Computer-Aided Diagnosis 2007, (published online).
15. Varela C., Timp S., Karssemeijer N. Use of border information in the classification of mammographic masses. Physics in Medicine and Biology 2006, 51(2):425-441.
16. Delogu P., Evelina Fantacci M., Kasae P., Retico A. Characterization of mammographic masses using a gradient-based segmentation algorithm and a neural classifier. Computers in Biology and Medicine 2007, 37(10):1479-1491.
17. Riza E., dos Santos Silva I., De Stavola B., Perry N., Karadedou-Zafiriadou E., Linos D., Remoundos D.-D., Linos A. Correlates of high-density mammographic parenchymal patterns by menopausal status in a rural population in Northern Greece. European Journal of Cancer 2005, 41(4):590-600.
18. Zheng B., Swensson R.G., Golla S., Hakim C.M., Shah R., Wallace L., Gur D. Detection and classification performance levels of mammographic masses under different computer-aided detection cueing environments. Academic Radiology 2004, 11(4):398-406.
19. Mavroforakis M.E., Georgiou H.V., Dimitropoulos N., Cavouras D., Theodoridis S. Mammographic masses characterization based on localized texture and dataset fractal analysis using linear, neural and support vector machine classifiers. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 2006, 37(2):145-162.
20. Crandall C.J., Zheng Y., Karlamangla A., Sternfeld B., Habel L.A., Oestreicher N., Johnston J., Cauley J.A., Greendale G.A. The Association Between Mammographic Breast Density and Bone Mineral Density in the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation. Annals of Epidemiology 2007, 17(8):575-583.
21. Sajda P., Spence C., Parra L. A multi-scale probabilistic network model for detection, synthesis and compression in mammographic image analysis. Medical Image Analysis 2003, 7(2):187-204.
22. Georgiou H., Mavroforakis M., Dimitropoulos N., Cavouras D., Theodoridis S. Multi-scaled morphological features for the characterization of mammographic masses using statistical classification schemes. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 2007, 41(1):39-55.
23. Giger M.L., Vyborny C.J., Schmidt R.A. Computerized characterization of mammographic masses: analysis of spiculation. Cancer Letters 1994, 77(2-3):201-211.
24. Oliver A., Freixenet J., Marti J., Perez E., Pont J., Denton E.R.E., Zwiggelaar R. A review of automatic mass detection and segmentation in mammographic images. Medical Image Analysis 2010, 14(2):87-110.
25. Cheng H.D., Shi X.J., Min R., Hu L.M., Cai X.P., Du H.N. Approaches for automated detection and classification of masses in mammograms. Pattern Recognition 2006, 39(4):646-668.
26. Forsyth D.A., Ponce J. Computer Vision: A Modern Approach 2003, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NY.
27. Gonzalez R.C., Woods R.E. Digital Image Processing 2002, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
28. Wei C.-H., Li C.-T., Li Y. Content-based retrieval for mammograms. Artificial Intelligence for Maximizing Content-Based Image Retrieval 2008, Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA, USA. Z.M. Ma (Ed.).
29. Papakostas G.A., Boutalis Y.S., Karras D.A., Mertzios B.G. A new class of Zernike moments for computer vision applications. Information Sciences 2007, 177(13):2802-2819.
30. Wee C.-Y., Paramesran R. On the computational aspects of Zernike moments. Image and Vision Computing 2007, 25(6):967-980.
31. Wei C.-H., Li Y., Chau W.Y., Li C.-T. Trademark image retrieval: using synthetic features for describing global shape and interior structure of trademark. Pattern Recognition 2009, 42(3):386-394.
32. Charman W.N. Wavefront technology: past, present, and future. Contact Lens and Anterior Eye 2005, 28(2):75-92.