Acuity of mental representations of pitch

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Volumn 1252, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 214-221

  Janata, Petr ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention; Discrimination; Event related potentials; Imagery; Music

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; BRAIN; BRAIN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; HEARING ACUITY; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGERY; SINGING; TASK PERFORMANCE; WORKING MEMORY;

EID: 84860235402     PISSN: 00778923     EISSN: 17496632     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06441.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Navarro Cebrian, A. & P. Janata 2010. Influences of multiple memory systems on auditory mental image acuity. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 127: 3189-3202.
2. Janata, P. & K. Paroo 2006. Acuity of auditory images in pitch and time. Percept. Psychophys. 68: 829-844.
3. Näätänen, R. 1992. Attention and Brain Function. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Hillsdale, NJ.
4. Suga, N. et al 2000. The corticofugal system for hearing: recent progress. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 11807-11814.
5. Näätänen, R. & T. Picton 1987. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 24: 375-425.
6. Pantev, C. et al 1995. Specific tonotopic organizations of different areas of the human auditory cortex revealed by simultaneous magnetic and electric recordings. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 94: 26-40.
7. Halpern, A.R. & R.J. Zatorre 1999. When that tune runs through your head: a PET investigation of auditory imagery for familiar melodies. Cereb. Cortex. 9: 697-704.
8. Jäncke, L., S. Mirzazade & N.J. Shah 1999. Attention modulates activity in the primary and the secondary auditory cortex: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in human subjects. Neurosci. Lett. 266: 125-128.
9. Woldorff, M.G. & S.A. Hillyard 1991. Modulation of early auditory processing during selective listening to rapidly presented tones. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 79: 170-191.
10. Woldorff, M.G. et al 1993. Modulation of early sensory processing in human auditory cortex during auditory selective attention. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90: 8722-8726.
11. Zatorre, R.J. et al 1996. Hearing in the mind's ear: a PET investigation of musical imagery and perception. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 8: 29-46.
12. Janata, P. 2001. Brain electrical activity evoked by mental formation of auditory expectations and images. Brain Topogr. 13: 169-193.
13. Herholz, S.C. et al 2008. Neural basis of music imagery and the effect of musical expertise. Eur. J. Neurosci. 28: 2352-2360.
14. Navarro Cebrian, A & P. Janata. 2010. Electrophysiological correlates of accurate mental image formation in auditory perception and imagery tasks. Brain Res. 1342: 39-54.
15. Woods, D.L. & R. Elmasian 1986. The habituation of event-related potentials to speech sounds and tones. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 65: 447-459.
16. Lange, K. 2009. Brain correlates of early auditory processing are attenuated by expectations for time and pitch. Brain Cogn. 69: 127-137.
17. Barnes, R. & M.R. Jones 2000. Expectancy, attention, and time. Cogn. Psychol. 41: 254-311.
18. Jones, M.R. et al 2002. Temporal aspects of stimulus-driven attending in dynamic arrays. Psychol. Sci. 13: 313-319.
19. Fuster, J.M. 2001. The prefrontal cortex: an update-time is of the essence. Neuron. 30: 319-333.
20. Haggard, P. & B. Whitford 2004. Supplementary motor area provides an efferent signal for sensory suppression. Cognit. Brain Res. 19: 52-58.
21. Baess, P., T. Jacobsen & E. Schroeger 2008. Suppression of the auditory N1 event-related potential component with unpredictable self-initiated tones: evidence for internal forward models with dynamic stimulation. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 70: 137-143.
22. Lange, K. 2011. The reduced N1 to self-generated tones: an effect of temporal predictability? Psychophysiology 48: 1088-1095.
23. Polich, J. 2007. Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clin. Neurophysiol. 118: 2128-2148.
24. Janata, P. 1995. ERP measures assay the degree of expectancy violation of harmonic contexts in music. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 7: 153-164.
25. Crottaz-Herbette, S. & V. Menon 2006. Where and when the anterior cingulate cortex modulates attentional response: combined fMRI and ERP evidence. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 18: 766-780.
26. Gehring, W.J. & R.T. Knight 2000. Prefrontal-cingulate interactions in action monitoring. Nat. Neurosci. 3: 516-520.
27. Carter, C.S. & V. van Veen. 2007. Anterior cingulate cortex and conflict detection: an update of theory and data. Cognit. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 7: 367-379.
28. Kiehl, K.A. et al 2001. Neural sources involved in auditory target detection and novelty processing: an event-related fMRI study. Psychophysiology. 38: 133-142.
29. Näätänen, R. & I. Winkler 1999. The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. Psychol. Bull. 125: 826-859.
30. Catani, M. & M. Mesulam 2008. The arcuate fasciculus and the disconnection theme in language and aphasia: history and current state. Cortex 44: 953-961.
31. Koelsch, S. et al 2009. Functional architecture of verbal and tonal working memory: an fMRI study. Hum. Brain Mapp. 30: 859-873.
32. Loui, P., D. Alsop & G. Schlaug 2009. Tone deafness: a new disconnection syndrome? J. Neurosci. 29: 10215-10220.
33. Loui, P. et al 2008. Action-perception mismatch in tone-deafness. Curr. Biol. 18: R331-R332.