A robust desirability function method for multi-response surface optimization considering model uncertainty

European Journal of Operational Research

Volumn 221, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 241-247

  He, Zhen ^a   Zhu, Peng Fei ^a,c   Park, Sung Hyun ^b  

^a TIANJIN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^c CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK   (China)

Author keywords

Desirability function; Hybrid genetic algorithm; Multi response surface optimization; Quality management; Robust optimization

Indexed keywords

CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DESIRABILITY FUNCTION; DESIRABILITY FUNCTION APPROACH; HYBRID GENETIC ALGORITHMS; MODEL UNCERTAINTIES; MULTIPLE RESPONSE; MULTIRESPONSE; RESPONSE SURFACE MODELS; ROBUST OPTIMIZATION; ROBUSTNESS MEASURES; SURFACE OPTIMIZATION;

OPTIMIZATION; QUALITY MANAGEMENT; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

GENETIC ALGORITHMS;

EID: 84860231421     PISSN: 03772217     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.03.009     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. H.-G. Beyer, and B. Sendhoff Robust optimization - a comprehensive survey Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 196 33-34 2007 3190 3218
2. W.E. Biles A response surface method for experimental optimization of multi-response process Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Process Design and Development 14 2 1975 152 158
3. G.E.P. Box, and N.R. Draper Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces second ed. 2007 Wiley
4. C.-H. Chiao, and M. Hamada Analyzing experiments with correlated multiple responses Journal of Quality Technology 33 4 2001 451 465
5. G. Derringer A balancing act: optimizing a product's properties Quality Progress 6 1994 51 58
6. G. Derringer, and R. Suich Simultaneous optimization of several response variables Journal of Quality Technology 12 4 1980 214 219
7. F.W. Gembicki, and Y.Y. Haimes Approach to performance and sensitivity multiobjective optimization: the goal attainment method IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 20 6 1975 769 771
8. P.L. Goethals, and B.R. Cho The development of a robust design methodology for time-oriented dynamic quality characteristics with a target profile Quality and Reliability Engineering International 27 4 2011 403 414
9. D.E. Goldberg Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning 1989 Addison-Wesley Massachusetts
10. N. Gülpinar, and B. Rustem Robust optimal decisions with imprecise forecasts Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 51 7 2007 3595 3611
11. E. Harrington The desirability function Industrial Quality Control 4 1965 494 498
12. Z. He, P. Zhu, J. Wang, and S.H. Park Robust multi-response parameter design based on RSM Asian Journal on Quality 10 3 2009 1 11
13. Z. He, J. Wang, J. Oh, and S.H. Park Robust optimization for multiple responses using response surface methodology Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry 26 2 2010 157 171
14. R. Hook, and T.A. Jeeves Direct search solution of numerical and statistical problems Journal of Association for Computing Machinery 8 2 1961 212 229
15. I.-J. Jeong, and K.-J. Kim An interactive desirability function method to multiresponse optimization European Journal of Operational Research 195 2 2009 412 426
16. L. Jourdan, M. Basseur, and E.-G. Talbi Hybridizing exact methods and metaheuristics: a taxonomy European Journal of Operational Research 199 3 2009 620 629
17. R.B. Kazemzadeh, M. Bashiri, A.C. Atkinson, and R. Noorossana A general framework for multiresponse optimization problems based on goal programming European Journal of Operational Research 189 2 2008 421 429
18. A.I. Khuri, and M. Conlon Simultaneous optimization of multiple responses represented by polynomial regression functions Technometrics 23 4 1981 363 375
19. A. Khuri, and J. Cornell Response Surfaces: Designs and Analyses 1996 Dekker New York
20. K. Kim, and D. Lin Simultaneous optimization of multiple responses by maximizing exponential desirability functions Applied Statistics (Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C) 49 3 2000 311 325
21. K. Kim, and D. Lin Optimization of multiple responses considering both location and dispersion effects European Journal of Operational Research 169 1 2006 133 145
22. R.M. Lewis, V. Torczon, and M.W. Trosset Direct search methods: then and now Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 124 1-2 2000 191 207
23. D.C. Montgomery Design and Analysis of Experiments sixth ed. 2005 Wiley New York
24. R.H. Myers Response surface methodology - current status and future directions Journal of Quality Technology 31 1 1999 30 44
25. R.H. Myers, and D.C. Montgomery Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments second ed. 2002 Wiley New York
26. K.S. Park, and K.-J. Kim Optimizing multi-response surface problems: how to use multi-objective optimization techniques IIE Transactions 37 6 2005 523 532
27. J. Peterson A posterior predictive approach to multiple response surface optimization Journal of Quality Technology 36 2 2004 139 153
28. J.J. Pignatiello Strategies for robust multiresponse quality engineering IIE Transactions 25 3 1993 5 15
29. E. Stinstra, and D. Hertog Robust optimization using computer experiments European Journal of Operational Research 191 3 2008 816 837
30. E.-G. Talbi A taxonomy of hybrid metaheuristics Journal of Heuristics 8 5 2002 541 564
31. G.G. Vining A compromise approach to multiresponse optimization Journal of Quality Technology 30 4 1998 309 313
32. J. Wang, Y. Ma, and G. Su Robust parameter design of dynamic multi-response system: a new integrated method Asian Journal on Quality 12 1 2011 67 79
33. G.A. Watson Robust counterparts of errors-in-variables problems Computational Statisticas & Data Analysis 52 2 2007 1080 1089
34. D. Xu, and S.L. Albin Robust optimization of experimentally derived objective functions IIE Transactions 35 9 2003 793 802
35. K. Xu, D.K.J. Lin, L.-C. Tang, and M. Xie Multiresponse systems optimization using a goal attainment approach IIE Transactions 36 5 2004 433 445
36. O.P. Yadav, S.S. Bhamare, and A. Rathore Reliability-based robust design optimization: a multi-objective framework using hybrid quality loss function Quality and Reliability Engineering International 26 1 2010 27 41