The erosion of state capacity and the European innovation policy dilemma: A comparison of German and EU information technology policies

Research Policy

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 905-921

  Grande, Edgar ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Europeanization; Globalization; Technology policy

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035370042     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00164-5     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Aigrain, P., et al., 1989. The Report of the Framework Programme Review Board. Brussels.
2. Anchordogay, M., 1989. Computers Inc.: Japan's Challenge to IBM. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
3. Andreasen, L.E., Coriat, B., den Hertog F., Kaplinsky, R. (Eds.), 1995. Europe's Next Step: Organizational Innovation, Competition and Employment. Frank Cass, London.
4. Arnold, E., Guy, K., 1986. Parallel Convergence: National Strategies in Information Technology. Pinter, London.
5. BMBF (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung), 1998a. Das 5. Europäische Forschungsrahmenprogramm. Chancen für die Forschung in Deutschland. BMBF, Bonn.
6. BMBF (Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft, Forschung und Technologie), 1998b. Faktenbericht 1998. BMBF, Bonn.
7. Boutellier R., Kloth B., Bodmer C.E. Neue Organisationsformen globaler Forschung und Entwicklung. Zeitschrift Führung + Organisation. 65:1996;282-287.
8. Brandin, D.H., Harrison, M.A., 1987. The Technology War. A Case for Competitiveness. Wiley, New York.
9. Braczyk, H.-J., Cooke, P., Heidenreich, M. (Eds.), 1998. Regional Innovation Systems. UCL Press, London.
10. Braczyk, H.-J., Fuchs, G., Wolf, H.-G. (Eds.), 1999. Multimedia and Regional Economic Restructuring. Routledge, London.
11. Camilleri, J.A., Falk, J., 1992. The End of Sovereignty? The Politics of a Shrinking and Fragmenting World. Edward Elgar, Aldershot.
12. Cawson, A., et al., 1990. Hostile Brothers: Competition and Closure in the European Electronics Industry. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
13. Consultative Group on Competitiveness, 1995. Improving European Competitiveness. First report to the President of the Commission and the Heads of State or Government. Brussels.
14. Cuhls, K., 1998. Technikvorausschau in Japan. Ein Rückblick auf 30 Jahre Delphi-Expertenbefragungen. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg.
15. Davignon Panel, 1997. Five-Year Assessment of the European Community RTD Framework Programmes by an Independent Panel Chaired by Viscount E. Davignon. Brussels.
16. Dekker Report, 1992. The Report of the Information and Communications Technologies Review Board. Brussels.
17. European Commission, 1990. Industriepolitik in einem offenen und wettbewerbsorientierten Umfeld. COM (90) 556, Brussels.
18. European Commission, 1992. Die Forschung nach Maastricht - Bilanz und Strategie. SEK (92) 682, Brussels.
19. European Commission, 1993. White Paper on Growth, Competitiveness, Employment. The Challenges and Ways Forward into the 21st Century. Brussels.
20. European Commission, 1995. Green Paper on Innovation. Brussels.
21. European Commission, 2000. Towards a European research area. Communication from the Commission. COM (2000) 6, Brussels.
22. Evans, P.B., Rueschemeyer, D., Skocpol T. (Eds.), 1985a. Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
23. Evans, P.B., Rueschemeyer, D., Skocpol, T., 1985b. On the road toward a more adequate understanding of the state. In: Evans, P.B., Rueschemeyer, D., Skocpol T. (Eds.), Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 347-366.
24. Fach W., Grande E. Emergent rationality in technological policy: nuclear energy in the Federal Republic of Germany. Minerva. XXX:1992;14-27.
25. Flamm, K., 1988. Creating the Computer: Government, Industry, and High Technology. Brookings, Washington, DC.
26. Fransman, M., 1990. The Market and Beyond: Cooperation and Competition in Information Technology Development in the Japanese System. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
27. Gerybadze, A., Meyer-Krahmer, F., Reger, G., 1997. Globales Management von Forschung und Innovation. Schäffer-Poeschel-Verlag, Stuttgart.
28. Grande, E., 1994. Vom Nationalstaat zur europäischen Politikverflechtung. Expansion und Transformation moderner Staatlichkeit - untersucht am Beispiel der Forschungs- und Technologiepolitik. Habilitationsschrift, Universität Konstanz, Germany.
29. Grande E. Forschungspolitik in der Politikverflechtungs-Falle? institutionelle Strukturen, Konfliktdimensionen und Verhandlungslogiken europäischer Forschungs- und Technologiepolitik. Politische Vierteljahresschrift. 36:1995;460-483.
30. Grande, E., 1999. Innovationspolitik im europäischen Mehrebenensystem: zur neuen Architektur des Staatlichen. In: Grimmer, K., Kuhlmann, S., Meyer-Krahmer, F. (Eds.), Innovationspolitik in globalisierten Arenen. Leske + Budrich, Opladen, pp. 87-103.
31. Grande, E., Häusler, J., 1994. Industrieforschung und Forschungspolitik. Staatliche Steuerungspotentiale in der Informationstechnik. Campus, Frankfurt a. M.
32. Grande E., Peschke A. Organizing science in Europe. European Review. 7:1999a;295-312.
33. Grande E., Peschke A. Transnational cooperation and policy networks in European science policy-making. Research Policy. 28:1999;43-61.
34. Hack, L., 1998. Technologietransfer und Wissenstransformation. Zur Globalisierung der Forschungsorganisation von Siemens. Westfälisches Dampfboot, Münster.
35. Hall, P.A., 1986. Governing the Economy. Polity Press, Oxford.
36. Hall P.A., Taylor R.C.R. Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies. 44:1996;936-957.
37. Hohn, H.-W., Schimank, U., 1990. Konflikte und Gleichgewichte im Forschungssystem: Akteurkonstellationen und Entwicklungspfade in der staatlich finanzierten außeruniversitären Forschung. Campus, Frankfurt a. M.
38. Katzenstein, P. (Ed.), 1978. Between Power and Plenty. Foreign Economic Policy of Advanced Industrial States. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI.
39. Katzenstein, P., 1987. Policy and Politics in West Germany: The Growth of a Semisovereign State. Temple University Press, Philadelphia.
40. Lax, D.A., Sebenius, J.K., 1986. The Manager as Negotiator. Free Press, New York.
41. Lundvall, B.-A., 1985. Product Innovation and User-Producer Interaction. Aalborg University Press, Aalborg.
42. Lundvall, B.-A., Borrás, S., 1998. The globalising learning economy: implications for innovation policy. European Commission, Brussels.
43. Luttwak, E.N., 1993. The Endangered American Dream: How to Stop the United States From Becoming a Third World Country and How to Win the Geo-Economic Struggle for Industrial Supremacy. Simon & Schuster, New York.
44. Mayntz, R., Scharpf, F.W., 1975. Policy-Making in the German Federal Bureaucracy. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
45. Mayntz, R., Scharpf, F.W. (Eds.), 1995. Gesellschaftliche Selbstregelung und politische Steuerung. Campus, Frankfurt a. M.
46. Meyer-Krahmer, F., 1989. Der Einfluß staatlicher Technologiepolitik auf industrielle Innovationen. Nomos, Baden-Baden.
47. Meyer-Krahmer, F. (Ed.), 1999. Globalisation of R&D and Technology Markets. Consequences for National Innovation Policies. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg.
48. Mintzberg H., McHugh A. Strategy formation in an adhocracy. Administrative Science Quarterly. XXX:1985;160-197.
49. Muldur, U., Petrella, R. (Eds.), 1994. The European Community and the Globalization of Technology and the Economy. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
50. Nelson, R.R. (Ed.), 1982. Government and Technical Progress: A Cross-Industry Analysis. Pergamon, New York.
51. OECD, 1991. Technology in a Changing World. OECD, Paris.
52. OECD, 1992. Technology and the Economy: The Key Relationship. OECD, Paris.
53. OECD, 1999. Globalisation of Industrial R&D: Policy Issues. OECD, Paris.
54. Ohmae, K., 1990. The Borderless World. Power and Strategy in the Interlinked Economy. Harper, New York.
55. Patel, P., Pavitt, K., 1991. Large firms in the production of the world's technology: an important case of non-globalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 1-21.
56. Peterson, J., 1993. High technology and the competition state: an analysis of the Eureka programme. Routledge, London.
57. Peterson, J., Sharp, M., 1999. Technology Policy in the European Union. Macmillan, London.
58. Porter, M.E., 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Free Press, New York.
59. Reger, G., Kuhlmann, S., 1995. Europäische Technologiepolitik in Deutschland: Bedeutung für die deutsche Forschungslandschaft. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg.
60. Sabatier P.A. Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research: a critical analysis and suggested synthesis. Journal of Public Policy. 6:1986;21-48.
61. Sandholtz, W., 1992. High-Tech Europe: The Politics of International Cooperation. University of California Press, Berkeley.
62. Scharpf, F.W., 1987. Sozialdemokratische Krisenpolitik in Europa. Das Modell Deutschland im Vergleich. Campus, Frankfurt a. M.
63. Schnöring, T., Neu, W., 1991. Bundesrepublik Deutschland. In: Grupp, H., Schnöring, T. (Eds.), Forschung und Entwicklung für die Telekommunikation: Internationaler Vergleich mit zehn Ländern, Bd. II. Springer, Berlin, pp. 255-412.
64. Sharp, M., Shearman, C., 1987. European Technological Cooperation. Routledge, London.
65. Simon H. The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society. 106:1962;467-482.
66. Steinmo, S., Thelen, K., Longstreth, F. (Eds.), 1992. Structuring Politics. Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
67. Stopford, J.M., Strange, S., 1991. Rival States, Rival Markets. Competition for World Market Shares. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
68. Stucke, A., 1993. Institutionalisierung der Forschungspolitik: Entstehung, Entwicklung und Steuerungsprobleme des Bundesforschungsministeriums. Campus, Frankfurt a.M.
69. Thelen, K., Steinmo, S., 1992. Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. In: Steinmo, S., Thelen, K., Longstreth, F. (Eds.), Structuring Politics. Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1-32.
70. Thurow, L., 1992. Head to Head. The Coming Economic Battle Among Japan, Europe, and America. William Morrow, New York.
71. Tyson, L., 1992. Who's Bashing Whom? Trade Conflict in High-Technology Industries. Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC.
72. Van der Meulen B., Rip A. Mediation in the Dutch science system. Research Policy. 27:1998;757-769.
73. Weaver, R.K., Rockman, B.A. (Eds.), 1993. Do Institutions Matter? Government Capabilities in the United States and Abroad. The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
74. Weiss, L., 1998. The Myth of the Powerless State. Governing the Economy in a Global Era. Polity Press, Oxford.
75. Weyrich, C., 1998. Industrieforschung vor globalen Herausforderungen. In: Fricke, W. (Ed.), Innovationen in Technik, Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Bonn, pp. 55-74.
76. Zysman, J., 1983. Governments, Markets, and Growth. Financial Systems and the Politics of Industrial Growth. Cornell University Press, Ithaca.