Semi-active fuzzy control of a wind-excited tall building using multi-objective genetic algorithm

Engineering Structures

Volumn 41, Issue , 2012, Pages 242-257

  Kim, Hyun Su ^a   Kang, Joo Won ^b  

^a SunMoon University   (South Korea)

^b Yeungnam University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Fuzzy logic control system; MR damper; Multi objective genetic algorithms; Semi active tuned mass damper; Tall building; Wind induced response control

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC DEVICES; COMPUTER CIRCUITS; CONTROL SYSTEMS; DAMPING; FUZZY CONTROL; FUZZY LOGIC; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; PARETO PRINCIPLE; TALL BUILDINGS;

FUZZY LOGIC CONTROL SYSTEM; MR DAMPERS; MULTI-OBJECTIVE GENETIC ALGORITHM; SEMI-ACTIVE; WIND-INDUCED RESPONSE;

CONTROLLERS;

CONTROL SYSTEM; DAMPING; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; GENETIC ALGORITHM; MULTISTOREY BUILDING; OPTIMIZATION; RHEOLOGY; VIBRATION; WIND;

EID: 84860216414     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.03.038     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Den Hartog J.P. Mechanical vibrations 1956, McGraw-Hill, New York.
2. Warburton G.B. Optimum absorber parameters for various combinations of response and excitation parameters. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 1982, 10:381-401.
3. Chang J.C.H., Soong T.T. Structural control using active tuned mass damper. J Eng Mech 1980, 106:1091-1098.
4. Ankireddi S., Yang H.T.Y. Simple ATMD control methodology for tall buildings subject to wind loads. J Struct Eng 1996, 122:83-91.
5. Gaul L., Hurlebaus S., Wirnitzer J., Albrecht H. Enhanced damping of lightweight structures by semi-active joints. Acta Mech 2008, 195:249-261.
6. Yi F., Dyke S., Caicedo J., Carlson J.D. Experimental verification of multi input seismic control strategies for smart dampers. J Eng Mech 2001, 127(11):1152-1164.
7. Casciati F., Magonette G., Marazzi F. Technology of semiactive devices and applications in vibration mitigation 2006, Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
8. Hidaka S., Ahn Y.K., Morishita S. Adaptive vibration control by a variable-damping dynamic absorber using ER fluid. J Vib Acoust 1999, 121:373-378.
9. Pinkaew T., Fujino Y. Effectiveness of semi-active tuned mass dampers under harmonic excitation. Eng Struct 2001, 23:850-856.
10. Varadarajan N., Nagarajaiah S. Wind response control of building with variable stiffness tuned mass damper using empirical mode decomposition/hilbert transform. J Eng Mech 2004, 130(4):451-458.
11. Koo J.H., Ahmadian M., Setareh M. Experimental robustness analysis of magneto-rheological tuned vibration absorbers subject to mass off-tuning. J Vib Acoust, Trans Am Soc Mech Eng 2006, 128(1):126-131.
12. Kim H.S., Roschke P.N., Lin P.Y., Loh C.H. Neuro-fuzzy model of hybrid semi-active base isolation system with FPS bearings and an MR damper. Eng Struct 2006, 28(7):947-958.
13. Dyke S.J., Spencer B.F., Sain M.K., Carlson J.D. Modeling and control of magnetorheological dampers for seismic response reduction. Smart Mater Struct 1996, 5:565-575.
14. Spencer B.F., Dyke S.J., Sain M.K., Carlson J.D. Phenomenological model of a magnetor-heological damper. J Eng Mech 1997, 123(3):230-238.
15. Kim H.S., Roschke P.N. Design of fuzzy logic controller for smart base isolation system using genetic algorithm. Eng Struct 2006, 28(1):84-96.
16. Ok S.Y., Kim D.S., Park K.S., Koh H.M. Semi-active fuzzy control of cable-stayed bridges using magneto-rheological dampers. Eng Struct 2007, 29(5):776-788.
17. Jung H.J., Choi K.M., Spencer B.F., Lee I.W. Application of some semi-active control algorithms to a smart base-isolated building employing MR dampers. Struct Control Health Monit 2006, 13:693-704.
18. Narasimhan S., Nagarajaiah S., Johnson E.A., Gavin H.P. Smart base isolated benchmark building. Part I: problem definition. Struct Control Health Monit 2006, 13:573-588.
19. Koo J.H., Setareh M., Murray T.M. In search of suitable control methods for semi-active tuned vibration absorbers. J Vib Control 2004, 10:163-174.
20. Feng Q, Shinozuka M. Use of a variable damper for hybrid control of bridge response under earthquake. In: US national workshop on structural control research. University of Southern California, Los Angeles; 1990.
21. Brogan W.L. Modern control theory 1991, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (NJ).
22. Dyke SJ, Spencer BF. Seismic response control using multiple MR dampers. In: 2nd International workshop on structural control. Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Research Center; 1996.
23. Inaudi J.A. Modulated homogeneous friction: a semi-active damping strategy. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 1997, 26(3):361-376.
24. Mamdani E.H., Assilian S. An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller. Int J Man Mach Stud 1975, 7(1):1-13.
25. Yang J.N., Agrawal A.K., Samali B., Wu J.C. Benchmark problem for response control of wind-excited tall buildings. J Eng Mech 2004, 130(4):437-446.
26. Min K.W., Kim H.S., Lee S.H., Kim H.J., Ahn S.K. Performance evaluation of tuned liquid column dampers for response control of a 76-story benchmark building. Eng Struct 2005, 27:1101-1112.
27. Aldawod M., Samali B., Naghdy F., Kwok K.C.S. Active control of along wind response of tall building using a fuzzy controller. Eng Struct 2001, 23:1512-1522.
28. Deb K., Pratap A., Agrawal S., Meyarivan T. A fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 2002, 6(2):182-197.
29. Ohtori Y., Christenson R.E., Spencer B.F., Dyke S.J. Benchmark control problems for seismically excited nonlinear buildings. J Eng Mech 2004, 130(4):366-385.
30. Samali B., Kwok K.C.S., Wood G.S., Yang J.N. Wind tunnel tests for wind-excited benchmark building. J Eng Mech 2004, 130(4):437-446.
31. Australian/New Zealand Standard. Structural design actions: wind actions, AS1170·2. Standards Australia, Sydney; 2002.
32. Sues R.H., Mau S.T., Wen Y.K. System identification of degrading hysteretic restoring forces. J Eng Mech 1988, 114(5):833-846.
33. Spencer B.F., Dyke S.J., Sain M.K., Carlson J.D. Phenomenological model of a magnetorheological damper. J Eng Mech 1997, 123(3):230-238.
34. Yi F., Dyke S.J., Caicedo J.M., Carlson J.D. Experimental verification of multi-input seismic control strategies for smart dampers. J Eng Mech 2001, 127(11):1152-1164.
35. The Math Works Inc. MATLAB R2009b, Natick, MA; 2009.
36. Ali S.F., Ramaswamy A. Optimal fuzzy logic control for MDOF structural systems using evolutionary algorithms. Eng Appl Artif Intell 2009, 22:407-419.
37. Yen J., Langari R. Fuzzy logic: intelligence, control, and information 1999, Prentice Hall, Inc., New York.
38. Setareh M. Use of semi-active tuned mass dampers for vibration control of force-excited structures. Struct Eng Mech 2001, 11(4):341-356.
39. Schaffer JD. Multiple objective optimization with vector evaluated genetic algorithms. In: First international conference on genetic algorithms, Hillsdale, NJ; 1985. p. 93-100.
40. Horn J., Nafpliotis N., Goldberg D.E. A niched Pareto genetic algorithm for multiobjective optimization. First IEEE conference on evolutionary computation 1994, IEEE Press, Orlando (FL), p. 82-7.
41. Fonseca CM, Fleming PJ. Genetic algorithms for multiobjective optimization: formulation, discussion and generalization. In: Genetic algorithms: fifth international conference. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA; 1993. p. 416-23.
42. Lim D., Ong Y.S., Jin Y., Sendhoff B., Lee B.S. Efficient hierarchical parallel genetic algorithms using grid computing. Future Gener Comput Syst 2007, 23(4):658-670.
43. Kwok Y.K., Ahmad I. Efficient scheduling of arbitrary task graphs to multiprocessors using a parallel genetic algorithm. J Parallel Distrib Comput 1997, 47(1):58-77.