Making disability public in deliberative democracy

Contemporary Political Theory

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 211-228

  Clifford, Stacy ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

deliberative democracy; dependency; disability; Habermas; reciprocity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860196959     PISSN: 14708914     EISSN: 14769336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/cpt.2011.11     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Ackerly, B.A. (2006) Deliberative democratic theory for building global civil society: Designing a virtual community of activists. Contemporary Political Theory 5 (2): 113-141.
2. Appelbaum, P.S. (2000) I vote. I count: Mental disability and the right to vote. Law and Psychiatry 51 (7): 849-851.
3. Arneil, B. (2009) Disability, self image, and modern political theory. Political Theory 37 (2): 218-242.
4. Benhabib, S. (1992) Situating the Self: Gender, Community, and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics. New York: Routledge.
5. Bickford, S. (1996) The Dissonance of Democracy: Listening, Conflict, and Citizenship. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
6. Bohman, J. (1996) Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Bohman, J. (1997) Deliberative democracy and effective social freedom: Capabilities, resources, and opportunities. In: J. Bohman and W. Rehg (eds.), Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 321-348.
8. Charlton, J.I. (1998) Nothing About Us Without Us: Disability Oppression and Empowerment. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
9. Dewey, J. (1927) The Public and its Problems. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
10. Elliott, A., Braun, D., Conour, K., Rosenblatt, R. and Baitz, R. (2008) Body and Soul: Diana and Kathy. Harriman: New Day Films.
11. Garland-Thomson, R. (2000) Staring back: Self-representations of disabled performance artists. American Quarterly 52 (2): 334-338.
12. Garland-Thomson, R. (2002) Integrating disability, transforming feminist theory. NWSA Journal 14 (3): 1-32.
13. Gutmann, A. and Thompson, D.F. (2004) Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14. Habermas, J. (1970) On systematically distorted communication. Inquiry 13 (1): 205-218.
15. Habermas, J. (1984) The Theory of Communicative Action. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
16. Habermas, J. (1990) Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Habermas, J. (1996) Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Habermas, J. (2004a) Public space and political public sphere - The biographical roots of two motifs in my thought. Commemorative Lecture: Kyoto.
19. Habermas, J. (2004b) Religious tolerance - The pacemaker for cultural rights. Philosophy 79 (1): 5-18.
20. Imrie, R. and Kumar, M. (1998) Focusing on disability and access in the built environment. Disability and Society 13 (3): 357-374.
21. Johnson, H.M. (2003) Unspeakable conversations. The New York Times 16 February.
22. Keith, L. (1996) Encounters with strangers: The public's responses to disabled women and how this affects our sense of self. In: J. Morris (ed.), Encounters with Strangers: Feminism and Disability.London: Women's Press, pp. 69-88.
23. Kittay, E.F. (1999) Love's Labor: Essays on Women, Equality, and Dependency. New York: Routledge.
24. Kittay, E.F. (2010) The personal is philosophical is political. In: E.F. Kittay and L. Carlson (eds.), Cognitive Disability and its Challenge to Moral Philosophy. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 393-413.
25. Koch, T. (2006) Bioethics as ideology: Conditional and unconditional values. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (3): 251-267. (Pubitemid 43890764)
26. Kudlick, C. and Longmore, P. (2006) Disability and the transformation of historians' public sphere, Perspectives online 44 (8), http://www.historians. org/perspectives/issues/2006/0611/0611for2cfm.
27. Langsdorf, L. (2000) The real conditions for the possibility of communicative action. In: L.E. Hahn (ed.), Perspectives on Habermas. Chicago and La Salle, IL: Open Court.
28. Lanoix, M. (2007) The citizen in question. Hypatia 22 (4): 116-129.
29. Matter of Haller. (1877) New York Supreme Court.
30. Mansbridge, J. (1999) Everyday talk in the deliberative system. In: S. Macedo (ed.), Deliberative Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 211-239.
31. Newell, C. (2006) Disability, bioethics, and rejected knowledge. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (3): 269-283. (Pubitemid 43890765)
32. PR Web Press Release Newswire. (2008) Disaboom survey reveals 52 per cent of Americans would rather be dead than disabled. 9 July, Denver, CO.
33. Rawls, J. (2005) Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
34. Ryfe, D. (2005) Does deliberative democracy work? Annual Review of Political Science 8 (1): 49-71. (Pubitemid 40977447)
35. Schweik, S. (2007) Begging the question: Disability, mendicancy, speech and the law. Narrative 15 (1): 58-70.
36. Scully, J.L. (2008) Disability Bioethics: Moral Bodies, Moral Difference. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
37. Shakespeare, T. (2006) The social model of disability. In: L.J. Davis (ed.), The Disability Studies Reader. New York: Routledge, pp. 197-204.
38. Walsh, D. (2011) Women's Rights in Democratizing States: Just Debate and Gender Justice in the Public Sphere. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
39. Weinberg, D. (2007) Habermas, rights, and the learning disabled citizen. Social Theory and Health 5 (1): 70-87.
40. Wetherow, D. and Wetherow, F. (2002) Community-building and commitment-building with PATH. In: J. O'Brien and C.L. O'Brien (eds.), Implementing Person-Centered Planning: Voices of Experience. Toronto, Canada: Inclusion Press.
41. Young, I.M. (1990) Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
42. Young, I.M. (1997a) Asymmetrical reciprocity: On moral respect, wonder, and enlarged thought. Constellations 3 (3): 340-363.
43. Young, I.M. (1997b) Intersecting Voices: Dilemmas of Gender, Political Philosophy, and Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 60-74.
44. Young, I.M. (2000) Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.