Information commonly unreported in intervention effectiveness studies

American Journal of Occupational Therapy

Volumn 66, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 7-10

  Gutman, Sharon A ^a   Murphy, Susan L ^b,c  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860177479     PISSN: 02729490     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5014/ajot.2012.003673     Document Type: Editorial

References (4)

1. Altman, D. G., Schulz, K. F., Moher, D., Egger, M., Davidoff, F., Elbourne, D., et al. (2001). The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: Explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine, 134, 663-694. Retrieved May 3, 2011, from www.annals.org/content/134/8/663.short (Pubitemid 32322245)
2. Boutron, I., Moher, D., Altman, D. G., Schulz, K. F., & Ravaud, P. (2008). Methods and processes of the CONSORT group: Example of an extension for trials assessing nonpharmacologic treatments. Annals of Internal Medicine, 148, 296-309. Retrieved May 11, 2011, from www.annals.org/content/148/4/295.full
3. Gutman, S. A. (2010). From the Desk of the Editor-Reporting standards for intervention effectiveness studies. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64, 523-527. 10.5014/ajot.2010.09644. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2010.09644
4. Moher, D., Schulz, K. F., & Altman, D. G. (2001). The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet, 357, 1191-1194. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736 (00) 04337-3 (Pubitemid 32378696)