Utilization and implications of the Static-99 in practice

Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 289-302

  Storey, Jennifer E ^a   Watt, Kelly A ^b   Jackson, Karla J ^a   Hart, Stephen D ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b ProActive ReSolutions Inc   (Canada)

Author keywords

actuarial assessments; risk assessment; sexual recidivism; Static 99

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860132689     PISSN: 10790632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1079063211423943     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Archer R. P.,Buffington-Vollum J. K.,Stredny R. V.,Handel R. W.A survey of psychological test use patterns among forensic psychologists.Journal of Personality Assessment. 2006;87:84-94.
2. Anderson D.,Hanson R. K.Handbook of violence risk assessment. Otto R. K.Douglas K. S., ed. New York, NY: Routledge; 2010:251-268.
3. Boccaccini M. T.,Murrie D. C.,Caperton J. D.,Hawes S. W.Field validity of the Static-99 and MnSOST-R among sex offenders evaluated for civil commitment as sexually violent predators.Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 2009;14:278-314.
4. Borum R.Improving the clinical practice of violence risk assessment: Technology, guidelines, and training.American Psychologist. 1996;51:945-956.
5. Cumming G.,Finch S.Inference by eye: Confidence intervals and how to read pictures of data.American Psychologist. 2005;60:170-180.
6. Doren D. M.Stability of interpretative risk percentages for the RRASOR and Static-99.Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research & Treatment. 2004;16:15-36.
7. Dudek F. J.The continuing misinterpretation of the standard error of measurement.Psychological Bulletin. 1979;86:335-337.
8. Ducro C.,Pham T.Evaluation of the SORAG and the Static-99 on Belgian sex offenders committed to a forensic facility.Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment. 2006;18:15-26.
9. Elbogen E. B.The process of violence risk assessment: A review of descriptive research.Aggression and Violent Behavior. 2002;7:591-604.
10. Fleiss J. L.The design and analysis of clinical experiments. Fleiss J. L., ed. New York, NY: Wiley; 1986:1-32.
11. Gore K. S.Adjusted actuarial assessment of sex offenders: The impact of clinical overrides on predictive accuracy.Dissertation Abstracts International. 2007;68 (07): 4824B.
12. Hanson R. K. Paper presented at the Fourth Annual Forensic Psychiatry Conference; Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
13. Hanson R. K.,Harris A. J. R.Where should we intervene? Dynamic predictors of sexual offense recidivism.Criminal Justice and Behaviour. 2000;27:6-35.
14. Hanson R. K.,Harris A. J. R.,Scott T.,Helmus L.Assessing the risk of sexual offenders on community supervision: The Dynamic Supervision Project. Ontario, Canada: Public Safety Canada; 2007:.
15. Hanson R. K.,Morton-Bourgon K. E.The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis. Ontario, Canada: Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada; 2007:.
16. Hanson R. K.,Morton-Bourgon K. E.The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies.Psychological Assessment. 2009;21:1-21.
17. Hanson R. K.,Thornton D.Static-99: Improving actuarial risk assessments for sex offenders. Ontario, Canada: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada; 1999:.
18. Helmus L.,Hanson R. K.,Thornton D.Reporting Static-99 in light of new research on recidivism norms.The Forum. 2009;21 (1): 38-45.
19. Interstate Commission for Adult Offender Supervision. (2007). Sex offender assessment information survey. Retrieved from www.interstatecompact.org/resources/surveys/survey_results/SexOffender_Assessment_042007.pdf.
20. Jackson R. L.,Hess D. T.Evaluation of civil commitment of sex offenders: A survey of experts.Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment. 2007;19:425-448.
21. Janus A. E.,Prentky R. A.Forensic use of actuarial risk assessment with sex offenders: Accuracy, admissibility, and accountability.American Criminal Law Review. 2003;40:1443-1499.
22. Levenson J. S.Sexual predator civil commitment: A comparison of selected and released offenders.International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 2004;48:638-648.
23. Lord F. M.,Novick M. R.Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1968:.
24. Monahan J.Limiting therapist exposure to Tarasoff liability: Guidelines for risk containment.American Psychologist. 1993;48:242-250.
25. Murrie D. C.,Boccaccini M. T.,Turner D.,Meeks M.,Woods C.,Tussey C.Rater (dis)agreement on risk assessment measures in sexually violent predator proceedings: Evidence of adversarial allegiance in forensic evaluation?.Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 2009;15:19-53.
26. VranaG. C.SrogaM.GuzzoL. (2008). Predictive validity of the LSI-OR among a sample of adult male sexual assaulters. Unpublished manuscript, Nipissing University, North Bay, Ontario, Canada.