Sensitivity of model predictions of muscle function to changes in moment arms and muscle-tendon properties: A Monte-Carlo analysis

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 45, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 1463-1471

  Ackland, David C ^a   Lin, Yi Chung ^a   Pandy, Marcus G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Muscle model; Optimum muscle fiber length; Peak isometric muscle force; Subject specific model; Tendon slack length

Indexed keywords

ARCHITECTURAL PROPERTIES; FORCE-LENGTH; GASTROCNEMIUS; HUMAN MOVEMENTS; LOWER LIMB; MODEL PREDICTION; MOMENT ARMS; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; MUSCLE FORCE; MUSCLE FUNCTION; MUSCLE MODELS; MUSCLE MOMENT ARMS; MUSCLE MOMENTS; MUSCULOSKELETAL MODEL; OPERATING REGIONS; OPTIMUM MUSCLE-FIBER LENGTH; RECTUS FEMORIS; SUB-REGIONS; SUBJECT-SPECIFIC; WHOLE-BODY CENTER OF MASS;

ARCHITECTURE; FORECASTING; HUMAN FORM MODELS; TENDONS; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

MUSCLE;

ADULT; ARM MOVEMENT; ARM MUSCLE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY; GAIT; GASTROCNEMIUS MUSCLE; GLUTEUS MAXIMUS MUSCLE; HAMSTRING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; JOINT FUNCTION; JOINT MOBILITY; KNEE FUNCTION; MALE; MONTE CARLO METHOD; MUSCLE FORCE; MUSCLE FUNCTION; MUSCLE ISOMETRIC CONTRACTION; MUSCLE LENGTH; NORMAL HUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECTUS FEMORIS MUSCLE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GAIT; HUMANS; JOINTS; LEG; LOCOMOTION; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TENDONS; TORQUE;

EID: 84860118519     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: 18732380     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.02.023     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Ackland D.C., Roshan-Zamir S., Richardson M., Pandy M.G. Moment arms of the shoulder musculature after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery 2010, 92:1221-1230.
2. Anderson F.C., Pandy M.G. A dynamic optimization solution for vertical jumping in three dimensions. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering 1999, 2:201-231.
3. Anderson F.C., Pandy M.G. Dynamic optimization of human walking. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 2001, 123:381-390.
4. Anderson F.C., Pandy M.G. Static and dynamic optimization solutions for gait are practically equivalent. Journal of Biomechanics 2001, 34:153-161.
5. Besier T.F., Fredericson M., Gold G.E., Beaupre G.S., Delp S.L. Knee muscle forces during walking and running in patellofemoral pain patients and pain-free controls. Journal of Biomechanics 2009, 42:898-905.
6. Correa T.A., Baker R., Kerr Graham H., Pandy M.G. Accuracy of generic musculoskeletal models in predicting the functional roles of muscles in human gait. Journal of Biomechanics 2011, 44:2096-2105.
7. Correa T.A., Crossley K.M., Kim H.J., Pandy M.G. Contributions of individual muscles to hip joint contact force in normal walking. Journal of Biomechanics 2010, 43:1618-1622.
8. De Groote F., Van Campen A., Jonkers I., De Schutter J. Sensitivity of dynamic simulations of gait and dynamometer experiments to hill muscle model parameters of knee flexors and extensors. Journal of Biomechanics 2010, 43:1876-1883.
9. Erdemir A., Mclean S., Herzog W., Van Den Bogert A.J. Model-based estimation of muscle forces exerted during movements. Clinical Biomechanics 2007, 22:131-154.
10. Friederich J.A., Brand R.A. Muscle fiber architecture in the human lower limb. Journal of Biomechanics 1990, 23:91-95.
11. Herzog W. Sensitivity of muscle force estimations to changes in muscle input parameters using nonlinear optimization approaches. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 1992, 114:267-268.
12. Lin Y.-C., Kim H.-J., Pandy M.G. A computationally efficient method for assessing muscle function during human locomotion. International Journal of Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering 2011, 27:436-449.
13. Liu M.Q., Anderson F.C., Pandy M.G., Delp S.L. Muscles that support the body also modulate forward progression during walking. Journal of Biomechanics 2006, 39:2623-2630.
14. Nagano A., Komura T. Longer moment arm results in smaller joint moment development, power and work outputs in fast motions. Journal of Biomechanics 2003, 36:1675-1681.
15. Nemeth G., Ohlsen H. In vivo moment arm lengths for hip extensor muscles at different angles of hip flexion. Journal of Biomechanics 1985, 18:129-140.
16. Pandy M.G., Andriacchi T.P. Muscle and joint function in human locomotion. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering 2010, 12:401-433.
17. Pandy M.G., Lin Y.C., Kim H.J. Muscle coordination of mediolateral balance in normal walking. Journal of Biomechanics 2010, 43:2055-2064.
18. Piazza S.J. Muscle-driven forward dynamic simulations for the study of normal and pathological gait. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 2006, 3:5.
19. Raikova R.T., Prilutsky B.I. Sensitivity of predicted muscle forces to parameters of the optimization-based human leg model revealed by analytical and numerical analyses. Journal of Biomechanics 2001, 34:1243-1255.
20. Redl C., Gfoehler M., Pandy M.G. Sensitivity of muscle force estimates to variations in muscle-tendon properties. Human Movement Science 2007, 26:306-319.
21. Schache A.G., Blanch P.D., Brown N.A., Pandy M.G. Mechanics of the human hamstring muscles during sprinting. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise 2012, 44:647-658.
22. Scheys L., Van Campenhout A., Spaepen A., Suetens P., Jonkers I. Personalized MR-based musculoskeletal models compared to rescaled generic models in the presence of increased femoral anteversion: effect on hip moment arm lengths. Gait & Posture 2008, 28:358-365.
23. Scovil C.Y., Ronsky J.L. Sensitivity of a Hill-based muscle model to perturbations in model parameters. Journal of Biomechanics 2006, 39:2055-2063.
24. Steele K.M., Seth A., Hicks J.L., Schwartz M.S., Delp S.L. Muscle contributions to support and progression during single-limb stance in crouch gait. Journal of Biomechanics 2010, 43:2099-2105.
25. Tate C.M., Williams G.N., Barrance P.J., Buchanan T.S. Lower extremity muscle morphology in young athletes: an MRI-based analysis. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise 2006, 38:122-128.
26. Thelen D.G. Adjustment of muscle mechanics model parameters to simulate dynamic contractions in older adults. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 2003, 125:70-77.
27. Valero-Cuevas F.J., Johanson M.E., Towles J.D. Towards a realistic biomechanical model of the thumb: the choice of kinematic description may be more critical than the solution method or the variability/uncertainty of musculoskeletal parameters. Journal of Biomechanics 2003, 36:1019-1030.
28. Viceconti M.T.D., Taddei F., Martelli S., Clapworthy G.J., Van Sint Jan S. Biomechanics modeling of the musculoskeletal apparatus: status and key issues. Proceedings of the IEEE 2006, 94:725-739.
29. Ward S.R., Eng C.M., Smallwood L.H., Lieber R.L. Are current measurements of lower extremity muscle architecture accurate?. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related 2009, 467:1074-1082.
30. Wilson D.L., Zhu Q., Duerk J.L., Mansour J.M., Kilgore K., Crago P.E. Estimation of tendon moment arms from three-dimensional magnetic resonance images. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 1999, 27:247-256.
31. Wilson N.A., Sheehan F.T. Dynamic in vivo 3-dimensional moment arms of the individual quadriceps components. Journal of Biomechanics 2009, 42:1891-1897.
32. Xiao M., Higginson J. Sensitivity of estimated muscle force in forward simulation of normal walking. Journal of Applied Biomechanics 2010, 26:142-149.
33. Yu J., Ackland D.C., Pandy M.G. Shoulder muscle function depends on elbow joint position: an illustration of dynamic coupling in the upper limb. Journal of Biomechanics 2011, 44:1859-1868.
34. Zajac F.E. Muscle and tendon: properties, models, scaling, and application to biomechanics and motor control. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology 1989, 17:359-411.
35. Zajac F.E., Gordon M.E. Determining muscle's force and action in multi-articular movement. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews 1989, 17:187-230.