Responsiveness and minimal clinically important change of the pain disability index in patients with chronic back pain

Spine

Volumn 37, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 711-715

  Soer, Remko ^a   Reneman, Michiel F ^a   Vroomen, Patrick C A J ^a   Stegeman, Patrick ^a   Coppes, Maarten H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

chronic pain; low back pain; measurement; psychometric properties; validity

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BACKACHE; CHRONIC PAIN; COHORT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PAIN DISABILITY INDEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF CARE; SELF REPORT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; BACK PAIN; CHRONIC PAIN; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84860014788     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822c8a7a     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Andersson GB. Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain. Lancet 1999; 354: 581-5. (Pubitemid 29381383)
2. Roland M, Morris R. A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1983; 8: 141-4.
3. Kopec JA, Esdaile JM, Abrahamowicz M, et al. The Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Measurement properties. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995; 20: 341-52.
4. Tait RC, Chibnall JT, Krause S. The Pain Disability Index: psychometric properties. Pain 1990; 40: 171-82. (Pubitemid 20070786)
5. Tait RC, Pollard CA, Margolis RB, et al. The Pain Disability Index: psychometric and validity data. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1987; 68: 438-41. (Pubitemid 17105053)
6. Jerome A, Gross RT. Pain disability index: construct and discriminant validity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1991; 72: 920-2.
7. Tait RC, Chibnall JT. Factor structure of the pain disability index in workers compensation claimants with low back injuries. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86: 1141-6. (Pubitemid 40797767)
8. Gronblad M, Hupli M, Wennerstrand P, et al. Intercorrelation and test-retest reliability of the Pain Disability Index (PDI) and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ) and their correlation with pain intensity in low back pain patients. Clin J Pain 1993; 9: 189-95. (Pubitemid 23275175)
9. Kuijer W, Brouwer S, Dijkstra PU, et al. Responsiveness of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire: consequences of using different external criteria. Clin Rehabil 2005; 19: 488-95. (Pubitemid 41131792)
10. Kamper SJ, Maher CG, Mackay G. Global rating of change scales: a review of strengths and weaknesses and considerations for design. J Man Manip Ther 2009; 17: 163-70.
11. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarifi cation of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol 2010; 10: 22.
12. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and defi nitions of measurement properties for health-related patientreported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2010; 63: 737-45.
13. Liang MH. Evaluating measurement responsiveness. J Rheumatol 1995; 22: 1191-2.
14. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982; 143: 29-36. (Pubitemid 12142173)
15. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007; 60: 34-42. (Pubitemid 44856236)
16. de Vet HC, Bouter LM, Bezemer PD, et al. Reproducibility and responsiveness of evaluative outcome measures. Theoretical considerations illustrated by an empirical example. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2001; 17: 479-87. (Pubitemid 33108642)
17. Demoulin C, Ostelo R, Knottnerus JA, et al. Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale was responsive and showed reasonable interpretability after a multidisciplinary treatment. J Clin Epidemiol 2010; 63: 1249-55.