Responsiveness of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire: Consequences of using different external criteria

Clinical Rehabilitation

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 488-495

  Kuijer, W ^a,b   Brouwer, S ^a,b   Dijkstra, P U ^a,b   Jorritsma, W ^a   Groothoff, J W ^b   Geertzen, J H B ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CHRONIC PAIN; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LOW BACK PAIN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; NETHERLANDS; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT REFERRAL; PHYSICAL CAPACITY; PHYSIOTHERAPY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REHABILITATION CENTER; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF CARE; SELF REPORT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; CHRONIC DISEASE; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOW BACK PAIN; MALE; PAIN; QUESTIONNAIRES; REHABILITATION CENTERS;

EID: 23644448754     PISSN: 02692155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/0269215505cr842oa     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Beurskens AJ, Vet de HC, Koke AJ, Heijden van der GJ, Knipschild PG. Measuring the functional status of patients with low back pain. Spine 1995; 20: 1017-28.
2. Bombardier C. Outcome assessments in the evaluation of treatment of spinal disorders: summary and general recommendations. Spine 2000; 25: 3100-103.
3. Roland M, Fairbank J. The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Spine 2000; 25: 3115-24.
4. Farrar JT, Young JP Jr, Moreaux La L, Werth JL, Poole MR. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain 2001; 94: 149-58.
5. Gronblad M, Jarvinen EAO, Ruuskanen M, Hamalainen H, Kouri J. Relationship of subjective disability with pain intensity, pain duration, pain location, and work-related factors in nonoperated patients with chronic low back pain. Clin J Pain 1996; 12: 194-200.
6. Hazard RG, Haugh LD, Green PA, Jones PL. Chronic low back pain. The relationship between patient satisfaction and pain, impairment, and disability outcomes. Spine 1994; 19: 881-87.
7. Brouwer S, Kuijer W, Dijkstra PU, Goeken LNH, Groothoff JW, Geertzen JHB. Reliability and stability of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire: intra class correlation and limits of agreement. Disabil Rehabil 2004; 26: 162-65.
8. Cohen, J, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press, 1988: 1-27.
9. Farrar JT, Portenoy RK, Berlin JA, Kinman JL, Strom BL. Defining the clinically important difference in pain outcome measures. Pain 2000; 88: 287-94.
10. Liang MH. Evaluating measurement responsiveness. J Rheumatol 1995; 22: 1191-92.
11. Takeyachi Y, Konno S, Otani K et al. Correlation of low back pain with functional status, general health perception, social participation, subjective happiness, and patient satisfaction. Spine 2003; 28: 1461-67.
12. Taylor SJ, Taylor AE, Foy MA, Fogg AJB. Responsiveness of common outcome measures for patients with low back pain. Spine 1999; 24: 1805-12.
13. Vet de HC, Bouter LM, Bezemer PM. Reproducibility and responsiveness of evaluative outcome measures. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2001; 17: 479-87.
14. Davidson M, Keating JL. A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness. Phys Ther 2002; 82: 8-24.
15. Riddle DL, Stratford PW, Binkley JM. Sensitivity to change of the Roland-Morris Back Pain Questionnaire: part 2. Phys Ther 1998; 78: 1197-207.
16. Stratford PW, Binkley J, Solomon P, Gill C, Finch E. Assessing change over time in patients with low back pain. Phys Ther 1994; 74: 528-33.
17. Stratford PW, Binkley JM, Riddle DL, Guyatt GH. Sensitivity to change of the Roland-Morris Back Pain Questionnaire: part 1. Phys Ther 1998; 78: 1186-96.
18. Gommans IHB, Koes BW, Tulder van MW. Validiteit en responsiviteit Nederlandstalige Roland Disability Questionnaire. Vragenlijst naar functionele status bij patiënten met lage rugpijn. (Validity and Responsiveness of the Dutch version of the Roland Disability Questionnaire. A functional status questionnaire for patients with low back pain.) Ned Tijds Fysiother 1997; 107: 28-33.
19. Kopec JA, Esdaile JM, Abrahamowicz M et al. The Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Spine 1995; 20: 341-52.
20. Patrick DL, Deyo R, Atlas SJ, Singer DE, Chapin A, Keller RB. Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with sciatica. Spine 1995; 20: 1899-909.
21. Stratford PW, Binkley J, Riddle DL. Health status measures: strategies and analytic methods for assessing change scores. Phys Ther 1996; 76: 1109-23.
22. Beurskens AJ, Vet de HC, Koke AJ. Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain. A comparison of different instruments. Pain 1996; 65: 71-6.
23. Deyo R, Centor R. Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: An analogy to diagnostic test performance. J Chronic Disabil 1986; 39: 897-906.
24. Terwee CB, Dekker FW, Wiersinga WM, Prummel MF, Bossuyt PMM. On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: Guidelines for instrument evaluation. Qual Life Res 2003; 12: 349-62.
25. Beaton DE, Hogg-Johnson S, Bombardier C. Evaluating changes in health status: reliability and responsiveness if five generic health status measures in workers with musculoskeletal disorders. J Clin Epidemiol 1997; 50: 79-93.
26. Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Carter WB, Gilson BS. Sickness Impact Profile: Development and final revision of health status measure. Med Care 1981; 19: 787-805.
27. Hagg O, Fritzell P, Nordwall A. The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 2003; 12: 12-20.
28. Sackett, DL, Haynes RB, Guyatt GH, Tugwell P. Clinical epidemiology, a basic science for clinical medicine. Boston/Toronto/London: Little, Brown and Company, 1991.
29. Gronblad M, Hupli M, Wennerstrand P et al. Intercorrelation and test-retest reliability of the Pain Disability Index (PDI) and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ) and their correlation with pain intensity in low back pain patients. Clin J Pain 1993; 9: 189-95.
30. Koho P, Aho S, Watson P, Hurri H. Assessment of chronic pain behaviour: reliability of the method and its relationship with perceived disability, physical impairment and function. J Rehabil Med 2001; 33: 128-32.
31. Linton SJ, Melin L. The accuracy of remembering chronic pain. Pain 1982; 13: 281-85.
32. Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G. Measuring change over time: Assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Disabil 1987; 40: 171-78.
33. Stratford PW, Binkley J, Solomon P, Finch E, Gill C, Moreland J. Defining the minimum level of detectable change for the Roland-Morris questionnaire. Phys Ther 1996; 76: 359-65.