Sixteen gauge needles improve specimen quality but not cancer detection rate in transrectal ultrasound-guided 10-core prostate biopsies

Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 270-273

  Inal, G H ^a   Oztekin V C ^a   Ugurlu O ^a   Kosan, M ^a   Akdemir, O ^a   Cetinkaya M ^a  

^a ANKARA TRAINING AND RESEARCH HOSPITAL   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CIPROFLOXACIN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEVER; HEMATURIA; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INFECTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORBIDITY; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PAIN; PATIENT SAFETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECTUM HEMORRHAGE; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ADENOCARCINOMA; AGED; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; EFFICIENCY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEEDLES; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; QUALITY CONTROL; ULTRASOUND, HIGH-INTENSITY FOCUSED, TRANSRECTAL;

EID: 50649099241     PISSN: 13657852     EISSN: 14765608     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/pcan.2008.34     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Paul R, Korzinek C, Necknig U, Niesel T, Alschibaja M, Leyh H et al. Influence of transrectal ultrasound probe on prostate cancer detection in transrectal ultrasound-guided sextant biopsy of prostate. Urology 2004; 64: 532-536.
2. Vanderkerken J, de la Rosette J, Laguna P, Debruyne F. How and when to take prostate biopsies. Eur Urol 2002; (Suppl 1): 15-20.
3. Norberg M, Egevad L, Holmberg L, Sparen P, Norten BJ, Busch C. The sextant protocol for ultrasound-guided core biopsies of the prostate underestimates the presence of cancer. Urology 1997; 50: 562-566.
4. Naughton CK, Miller DC, Mager DE, Ornstein DK, Catalona WJ. A prospective randomized trial comparing 6 versus 12 prostate biopsy cores: Impact on cancer detection. J Urol 2000; 164: 388-392.
5. Pepe P, Aragona F. Prostate needle biopsy: 12 vs 18 cores - is it necessary? Urol Int 2005; 74: 19-22.
6. de la Taille A, Antiphon P, Salomon L, Cherfan M, Porcher R, Hozneck A et al. Prospective evaluation of a 21-sample needle biopsy procedure designed to improve the prostate cancer detection rate. Urology 2003; 61: 1181-1186.
7. Taylor JA, Cangarczyk KJ, Fant GV, Mcleod DG. Increasing number of core samples taken at prostate needle biopsy enhances the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. Urology 2002; 60: 841-845.
8. Iczkowski KA, Casella G, Seppala RJ, Jones GL, Mishler BA, Qian J et al. Needle core length in sextant biopsy influences prostate cancer detection rate. Urology 2002; 59: 698-703.
9. Fink K, Hutarew G, Szlauer R, Goetschl R, Schmeller NT. Evaluation of 16-gauge needles for prostate biopsy. Eur Urol Suppl 2006; 5 312.
10. Ficarra V, Martignoni G, Novella G, Cerruto MA, Galfano A, Novara G et al. Needle core length is a quality indicator of systematic transperineal prostate biopsy. Eur Urol 2006; 50: 266-271.
11. Scattoni V, Zlotta AR, Nava L, Roscigno M, Montorsi F, Rigatti P. Prostatic transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided biopsy schemes and TRUS prostatic lesion-guided biopsies. Eur Urol 2002; (Suppl 1): 28-34.
12. Dogan HS, Eskicorapci SY, Ertoy-Baydar D, Akdogan B, Gunay LM, Ozen H. Can we obtain better specimens with an end-cutting prostatic biopsy device? Eur Urol 2005; 47: 297-301.
13. Ubhayakar GN, Li WY, Corbishley CM, Patel U. Improving glandular coverage during prostate biopsy using a long-core needle: Technical performance of an end-cutting needle. BJU Int 2002; 89: 40-43.
14. Özden E, Göǧüş Ç, Tulunay Ö, Baltaci S. The long core needle with end-cut technique for prostate biopsy: Does it really have advantages when compared with standard needles? Eur Urol 2004; 45: 287-291.
15. Haggarth L, Ekman P, Egevad L. A new core-biopsy instrument with an end-cut technique provides prostate biopsies with increased tissue yield. BJU Int 2002; 90: 51-55.
16. Levine MA, Ittman M, Melamed J, Lepor H. Two consecutive sets of transrectal ultrasound guided sextant biopsies of the prostate for detection of prostate cancer. J Urol 1998; 159: 471-475.
17. Karakiewicz PL, Bazinet M, Aprikian AG, Trudel C, Aronson S, Nachabe M et al. Outcome of sextant biopsy according to gland volume. Urology 1997; 49: 55-59.
18. Guichard G, Larré S, Gallina A, Lazar A, Faucon H, Chemama S et al. Extended 21-sample needle biopsy protocol for diagnosis of prostate cancer in 1000 consecutive patients. Eur Urol 2007; 52 430-435.
19. Eskew LA, Bare RL, McCullough DL. Systematic 5 region prostate biopsy is superior to sextant method for diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate. J Urol 1997; 157: 199-202.
20. Gore JL, Shariat SF, Miles BJ, Kadmon D, Jiang N, Wheeler TM et al. Optimal combinations of systematic sextant and laterally directed biopsies for the detection of prostate cancer. J Urol 2001; 165 1554-1559.
21. Morote J, Lopez M, Encabo G, de Torres I. Value of routine transition zone biopsies in patients undergoing ultrasound-guided sextant biopsies for the first time. Eur Urol 1999; 35: 294-297.
22. Terris MK, Pham TQ, Issa MM, Kabalin JN. Routine transition zone and seminal vesicle biopsies in all patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsies are not indicated. J Urol 1997; 157: 204-206.