Machine listening: Acoustic interface with ART

International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Proceedings IUI

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 293-296

  Smith, Benjamin D ^a   Garnett, Guy E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptive resonance theory; Artificial intelligence; Machine listening; Music; Unsupervised machine learning

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC SOUND; ADAPTIVE RESONANCE THEORY; COMPUTER HUMAN INTERACTION; COMPUTER INTERACTION; CONTEXT INFORMATION; CONTROL MODEL; EVENT-ORIENTED; MACHINE LISTENING; MUSIC; PERFORMANCE SYSTEM; SOUND DATA; UNSUPERVISED MACHINE LEARNING; VOICE-RECOGNITION SYSTEMS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; LEARNING SYSTEMS;

LEARNING ALGORITHMS;

EID: 84859992830     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2166966.2167021     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Carpenter, G. A., Grossberg, S., and Rosen, D. B. Fuzzy ART: fast stable learning and categorization of analog patterns by an adaptive resonance system. Neural Networks 4 (1991), 759-771.
2. Collins, N. Towards Autonomous Agents for Live Computer Music: Realtime Machine Listening and Interactive Music Systems. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, 2006.
3. Davis, C. J., and Bowers, J. S. Contrasting five different theories of letter position coding: Evidence from orthographic similarity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 32, 3 (2006), 535-557.
4. Fiebrink, R., Cook, P. R., and Trueman, D. Play-along mapping of musical controllers. In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference (2009).
5. Gjerdingen, R. O. Categorization of musical patterns by self-organizing neuronlike networks. Musical Perception (1990).
6. Hébert, S., and Peretz, I. Recognition of music in long-term memory: are melodic and temporal patterns equal partners? Memory & Cognition 4 (1997), 518-533.
7. Krumhansl, C. An exploratory study of musical emotions and psychophysiology. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale 51, 4 (1997), 336.
8. Miller George, A. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. The Psychological Review 63 (1956), 81-97.
9. Pearce, M., and Wiggins, G. Expectation in melody: The influence of context and learning. Music Perception (2006), 377-405.
10. Peretz, I., and Zatorre, R. J. Brain organization for music processing. Annual Reviews Psychology, 56 (2005), 89-114.
11. Pfordresher, P. The role of melodic and rhythmic accents in musical structure. Music Perception (2003), 431-464.
12. Piat, F. G. P. Artist: Adaptive resonance theory to internalize the structure of tonality. PhD in human development and communication sciences, University of Texas, Dallas, Aug. 1999.
13. Smith, B., and Garnett, G. The self-supervising machine. In New Interfaces for Musical Expression (2011).
14. Thom, B. Interactive improvisational music companionship: a user-modeling approach. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 13 (2003), 133-177.
15. Wessel, D. Connectionist models for musical control of nonlinear dynamical systems. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 92, 4 (Oct. 1992), 2402.