The self-supervising machine

Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 108-111

  Smith, Benjamin D ^a   Garnett, Guy E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptive resonance theory; Improvisation; Interactive computer music; Machine learning; Machine listening; NIME

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER MUSIC; LEARNING ALGORITHMS; MUSIC;

ADAPTIVE RESONANCE THEORY; CONTROL INPUTS; IMPROVIZATION; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER MUSIC; MACHINE LISTENING; MACHINE-LEARNING; MANY-TO-MANY MAPPINGS; NIME; PERFORMANCE; SUPERVISED MACHINE LEARNING;

SUPERVISED LEARNING;

EID: 84859124149     PISSN: 22204792     EISSN: 22204806     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. J. Aucouturier and F. Pachet. Tools and architecture for the evaluation of similarity measures: case study of timbre similarity. Journal of the American Society for Information, Special Issue on Music Information Recrieval, 2004.
2. G. A. Carpenter, S. Grossberg, and D. B. Rosen. Fuzzy ART: fast stable learning and categorization of analog patterns by an adaptive resonance system. Neural Networks, 4:759–771, 1991.
3. N. Collins. Towards Autonomous Agents for Live Computer Music: Realtime Machine Listening and Interactive Music Systems. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, 2006.
4. R. B. Dannenberg, B. Thom, and D. Watson. A machine learning approach to musical style recognition. In Proc. International Computer Music Conference, pages 344–347, 1997.
5. C. J. Davis and J. S. Bowers. Contrasting five different theories of letter position coding: Evidence from orthographic similarity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(3):535–557, 2006.
6. P. P. de León and J. Inesta. Pattern recognition approach for music style identification using shallow statistical descriptors. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews, IEEE Transactions on, 37(2):248–257, Feb. 2007.
7. R. Fiebrink, P. R. Cook, and D. Trueman. Play-along mapping of musical controllers. In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference, 2009.
8. R. O. Gjerdingen. Categorization of musical patterns by self-organizing neuronlike networks. Musical Perception, 1990.
9. A. Miller George. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. The Psychological Review, 63:81–97, 1956.
10. F. Pachet. Musical data mining for electronic music distribution. Web Delivering of Music, 2001. Proceedings. First International Conference on, pages 101–106, Nov. 2001.
11. I. Peretz and R. J. Zatorre. Brain organization for music processing. Annual Reviews, Psychology(56):89–114, 2005.
12. F. G. P. Piat. Artist: Adaptive resonance theory to internalize the structure of tonality. PhD in human development and communication sciences, University of Texas, Dallas, Aug. 1999.
13. E. Schubert, J. Wolfe, and A. Tarnopolsky. Spectral centroid and timbre in complex, multiple instrumental textures. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition, Sydney, Australia, 2004. University of New South Wales.
14. B. Thom. Interactive improvisational music companionship: a user-modeling approach. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 13:133–177, 2003.
15. B. Tillmann. Music cognition: Learning, perception, expectations. In Computer Music Modeling and Retrieval. Sense of Sounds., pages 11–33. Springer, Berlin, 2008.
16. D. Wessel. Connectionist models for musical control of nonlinear dynamical systems. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92(4):2402, Oct. 1992.