Intra- and interobserver variability of magnetic resonance imaging for quantitative assessment of abductor and external rotator muscle changes after total hip arthroplasty

European Journal of Radiology

Volumn 81, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 928-933

  Springer, I ^a   Muller M ^a   Hamm, B ^a   Dewey, M ^a  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Magnetic resonance imaging; Observer variability; Total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ABDUCTOR MUSCLE; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXTERNAL ROTATOR MUSCLE; FEMALE; GLUTEUS MAXIMUS MUSCLE; HIP; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; MUSCLE MASS; MUSCULOSKELETAL FUNCTION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OBSERVER VARIATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SKELETAL MUSCLE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ADULT; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; MUSCULAR DISEASES; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROGNOSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84859988901     PISSN: 0720048X     EISSN: 18727727     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.01.113     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bohm ER. Employment status and personal characteristics in patients awaiting hip-replacement surgery. Can J Surg 2009;52:142-6.
2. Brown TE, Larson B, Shen F, Moskal JT. Thigh pain after cementless total hip arthroplasty: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2002;10:385-92.
3. Bozic KJ, Rubash HE. The painful total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004:18-25. (Pubitemid 38436554)
4. De Maeseneer M, Gosselin R, De Ridder F, Shahabpour M, Vanderdood K. MR imaging changes in the trochanteric area of asymptomatic individuals: a potential for misdiagnosis of pain in the trochanteric region. Eur J Radiol 2009;72:480-2.
5. Rasch A, Bystrom AH, Dalen N, Martinez-Carranza N, Berg HE. Persisting muscle atrophy two years after replacement of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009;91:583-8.
6. Cahir JG, Toms AP, Marshall TJ, Wimhurst J, Nolan J. CT and MRI of hip arthroplasty. Clin Radiol 2007;62:1163-71, discussion 72-73.
7. Kalteis T, Handel M, Herold T, Perlick L, Paetzel C, Grifka J. Position of the acetabular cup - accuracy of radiographic calculation compared to CT-based measurement. Eur J Radiol 2006;58:294-300.
8. Huppertz A, Radmer S, Asbach P, Juran R, Schwenke C, Diederichs G, et al. Computed tomography for preoperative planning in minimal-invasive total hip arthroplasty: radiation exposure and cost analysis. Eur J Radiol 2009.
9. Kassarjian A, Brisson M, Palmer WE. Femoroacetabular impingement. Eur J Radiol 2007;63:29-35. (Pubitemid 46907480)
10. Anderson SE, Siebenrock KA, Mamisch TC, Tannast M. Femoroacetabular impingement magnetic resonance imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2009;20:123-8.
11. Keogh MJ, Batt ME. A review of femoroacetabular impingement in athletes. Sports Med 2008;38:863-78.
12. Kassarjian A, Cerezal L, Llopis E. MR arthrography of the hip with emphasis on femoroacetabular impingement. Radiologia 2009;51:17-29, quiz 119.
13. Rudisch A, Kremser C, Judmaier W, Zunterer H, DeVries AF. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a non-invasive method to evaluate significant differences between malignant and normal tissue. Eur J Radiol 2005;53:514-9. (Pubitemid 40312144)
14. Haliloglu N, Inceoglu D, Sahin G. Assessment of peritrochanteric high T2 signal depending on the age and gender of the patients. Eur J Radiol 2009.
15. Pfirrmann CW, Notzli HP, Dora C, Hodler J, Zanetti M. Abductor tendons and muscles assessed at MR imaging after total hip arthroplasty in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. Radiology 2005;235:969-76. (Pubitemid 40695896)
16. Potter HG, Foo LF, Nestor BJ. What is the role of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of total hip arthroplasty? HSS J 2005;1:89-93.
17. Twair A, Ryan M, O'Connell M, Powell T, O'Byrne J, Eustace S. MRI of failed total hip replacement caused by abductor muscle avulsion. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:1547-50. (Pubitemid 37466530)
18. White LM, Kim JK, Mehta M, Merchant N, Schweitzer ME, Morrison WB, et al. Complications of total hip arthroplasty: MR imaging-initial experience. Radiology 2000;215:254-62. (Pubitemid 30190539)
19. Soderman P, Malchau H. Is the Harris hip score system useful to study the outcome of total hip replacement? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001:189-97. (Pubitemid 33599782)
20. Von Korff M, Ormel J, Keefe FJ, Dworkin SF. Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain 1992;50:133-49.
21. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-10. (Pubitemid 16134762)
22. Toms AP, Smith-Bateman C, Malcolm PN, Cahir J, Graves M. Optimization of metal artefact reduction (MAR) sequences for MRI of total hip prostheses. Clin Radiol 2010;65:447-52.