Optimization of metal artefact reduction (MAR) sequences for MRI of total hip prostheses

Clinical Radiology

Volumn 65, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 447-452

  Toms, A P ^a   Smith Bateman, C ^a   Malcolm, P N ^a   Cahir, J ^a   Graves, M ^b  

^a NORFOLK AND NORWICH UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b ADDENBROOKE S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFACT REDUCTION; AUTOMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; IMAGE QUALITY; MATRIX SIZE INCREASE; METAL ARTIFACT REDUCTION SEQUENCE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; RECEIVER BANDWIDTH INCREASE; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; ARTIFACT; DEVICES; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ARTIFACTS; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; METALS; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

METAL;

EID: 77951667576     PISSN: 00099260     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2009.12.014     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Cahir J.G., Toms A.P., Marshall T.J., et al. CT and MRI of hip arthroplasty. Clin Radiol 62 (2007) 1163-1171 discussion 1172-1173
2. Pfirrmann C.W.A., Notzli H.P., Dora C., et al. Abductor tendons and muscles assessed at MR imaging after total hip arthroplasty in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. Radiology 235 (2005) 969-976
3. Potter H.G., Nestor B.J., Sofka C.M., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging after total hip arthroplasty: evaluation of periprosthetic soft tissue. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A (2004) 1947-1954
4. Toms A.P., Marshall T.J., Cahir J., et al. MRI of early symptomatic metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective review of radiological findings in 20 hips. Clin Radiol 63 (2008) 49-58
5. White L.M., Kim J.K., Mehta M., et al. Complications of total hip arthroplasty: MR imaging-initial experience. Radiology 215 (2000) 254-262
6. Lee M.J., Janzen D.L., Munk P.L., et al. Quantitative assessment of an MR technique for reducing metal artifact: application to spin-echo imaging in a phantom. Skeletal Radiol 30 (2001) 398-401
7. Kolind S.H., MacKay A.L., Munk P.L., et al. Quantitative evaluation of metal artifact reduction techniques. J Magn Reson Imaging 20 (2004) 487-495
8. Chang S.D., Lee M.J., Munk P.L., et al. MRI of spinal hardware: comparison of conventional T1-weighted sequence with a new metal artifact reduction sequence. Skeletal Radiol 30 (2001) 213-218
9. Eustace S., Goldberg R., Williamson D., et al. MR imaging of soft tissues adjacent to orthopaedic hardware: techniques to minimize susceptibility artefact. Clin Radiol 52 (1997) 589-594
10. Eustace S., Jara H., Goldberg R., et al. A comparison of conventional spin-echo and turbo spin-echo imaging of soft tissues adjacent to orthopedic hardware. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170 (1998) 455-458
11. Olsen R.V., Munk P.L., Lee M.J., et al. Metal artifact reduction sequence: early clinical applications. RadioGraphics 20 (2000) 699-712
12. Suh J.S., Jeong E.K., Shin K.H., et al. Minimizing artifacts caused by metallic implants at MR imaging: experimental and clinical studies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171 (1998) 1207-1213
13. Rosset A., Spadola L., and Ratib O. OsiriX: an open-source software for navigating in multidimensional DICOM images. J Digit Imaging 17 (2004) 205-216
14. Shrout P.E., and Fleiss J.L. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 86 (1979) 420-428
15. Runge V.M., Nitz W.R., Schmeets S.H., et al. The physics of clinical MR taught through images (2005), Thieme Publishing Group