Anisogamy, chance and the evolution of sex roles

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 260-264

  Schärer, Lukas ^a   Rowe, Locke ^b   Arnqvist, Göran ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COEVOLUTION; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; POLYGAMY; SEX ROLE; SEXUAL SELECTION;

ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ENVIRONMENT; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; MALE; REVIEW; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; SELECTION, GENETIC; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

EID: 84859985739     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.12.006     Document Type: Review

References (63)

1. Darwin C. On the Origin of Species 1859, John Murray.
2. Darwin C. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex 1871, John Murray.
3. Parker G.A., et al. Origin and evolution of gamete dimorphism and male-female phenomenon. J. Theor. Biol. 1972, 36:529-553.
4. Trivers R.L. Parental investment and sexual selection. Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man 1871-1971 1972, 136-179. Aldine Publishing Company. B. Campbell (Ed.).
5. Parker G.A. Sexual selection and sexual conflict. Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects 1979, 123-166. Academic Press. M.S. Blum, N.A. Blum (Eds.).
6. Charnov E.L. The Theory of Sex Allocation 1982, Princeton University Press.
7. Clutton-Brock T.H. The Evolution of Parental Care 1991, Princeton University Press.
8. Andersson M. Sexual Selection 1994, Princeton University Press.
9. Wade M.J., Shuster S.M. Mating Systems and Strategies 2003, Princeton University Press.
10. Arnqvist G., Rowe L. Sexual Conflict 2005, Princeton University Press.
11. Delph L.F., Ashman T.-L. Trait selection in flowering plants: how does sexual selection contribute?. Integr. Comp. Biol. 2006, 46:465-472.
12. Anthes N. Mate choice and reproductive conflict in simultaneous hermaphrodites. Animal Behaviour: Evolution and Mechanisms 2010, 329-357. Springer. P.K. Kappeler (Ed.).
13. Bulmer M.G., Parker G.A. The evolution of anisogamy: a game-theoretic approach. Proc. R. Soc. B 2002, 269:2381-2388.
14. Lessells C.M., et al. The evolutionary origin and maintenance of sperm: selection for a small, motile gamete mating type. Sperm Biology: An Evolutionary Perspective 2009, 69-149. Academic Press. T.R. Birkhead (Ed.).
15. Lehtonen J., Kokko H. Two roads to two sexes: unifying gamete competition and gamete limitation in a single model of anisogamy evolution. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2011, 65:445-459.
16. Parker G.A. The origin and maintenance of two sexes (anisogamy), and their gamete sizes by gamete competition. The Evolution of Anisogamy: a Fundamental Phenomenon Underlying Sexual Selection 2011, 17-74. Cambridge University Press. T. Togashi, P.A. Cox (Eds.).
17. Hubbell S.P., Johnson L.K. Environmental variance in lifetime mating success, mate choice, and sexual selection. Am. Nat. 1987, 130:91-112.
18. Gowaty P.A., Hubbell S.H. Chance, time allocation, and the evolution of adaptively flexible sex role behavior. Integr. Comp. Biol. 2005, 45:931-944.
19. Snyder B.F., Gowaty P.A. A reappraisal of Bateman's classic study of intrasexual selection. Evolution 2007, 61:2457-2468.
20. Gowaty P.A., Hubbell S.H. Reproductive decisions under ecological constraints: it's about time. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 105:10017-10024.
21. Ah-King M., Nylin S. Sex in an evolutionary perspective: just another reaction norm. Evol. Biol. 2010, 37:234-246.
22. Ah-King M. Female sexual selection in light of the Darwin-Bateman paradigm. Behav. Ecol. 2011, 22:1142-1143.
23. Sutherland W.J. Chance can produce a sex difference in variance in mating success and explain Bateman's data. Anim. Behav. 1985, 33:1349-1352.
24. Bateman A.J. Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 1948, 2:349-368.
25. Sutherland W.J. Random and deterministic components of variance in mating success. Sexual Selection: Testing the Alternatives 1987, 209-219. John Wiley & Sons. J. Bradbury, M.B. Andersson (Eds.).
26. Singh S.R., et al. Female remating, sperm competition and sexual selection in Drosophila. Genet. Mol. Res. 2002, 1:178-215.
27. Chapman T., et al. The sex peptide of Drosophila melanogaster: female post-mating responses analyzed by using RNA interference. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100:9923-9928.
28. Chapman T. The soup in my fly: evolution, form and function of seminal fluid proteins. PLoS Biol. 2008, 6:e179.
29. Liu H.F., Kubli E. Sex-peptide is the molecular basis of the sperm effect in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100:9929-9933.
30. Peng J., et al. Gradual release of sperm bound sex-peptide controls female postmating behavior in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 2005, 15:207-213.
31. Pitnick S., et al. Evolution of female remating behaviour following experimental removal of sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2001, 268:557-563.
32. Swanson W.J., et al. Evolutionary EST analysis identifies rapidly evolving male reproductive proteins in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001, 98:7375-7379.
33. Haerty W., et al. Evolution in the fast lane: rapidly evolving sex-related genes in Drosophila. Genetics 2007, 177:1321-1335.
34. Wolfner M.F. Battle and ballet: molecular interactions between the sexes in Drosophila. J. Hered. 2009, 100:399-410.
35. Pitnick S., et al. Delayed male maturity is a cost of producing large sperm in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1995, 92:10614-10618.
36. Chapman T., et al. Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature 1995, 373:241-244.
37. Zuk M. Sexual Selections 2003, University of California Press.
38. Parker G.A. Mate quality and mating decisions. Mate Choice 1983, 141-166. Cambridge University Press. P. Bateson (Ed.).
39. Hamilton W.D. Extraordinary sex ratios. Science 1967, 156:477-488.
40. Hayward A., Gillooly J.F. The cost of sex: quantifying energetic investment in gamete production by males and females. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e16557.
41. Barlow G.W. How do we decide that a species is sex-role reversed?. Q. Rev. Biol. 2005, 80:28-35.
42. Clutton-Brock T. Sexual selection in females. Anim. Behav. 2009, 77:3-11.
43. Fairbairn D.J., et al. Sex, Size and Gender Roles: Evolutionary Studies of Sexual Size Dimorphism 2007, Oxford University Press.
44. Kokko H., Jennions M.D. Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios. J. Evol. Biol. 2008, 21:919-948.
45. Jennions M.D., Kokko H. Sexual selection. Evolutionary Behavioral Ecology 2010, 343-364. Oxford University Press. D.F. Westneat, C.W. Fox (Eds.).
46. Munday P.L., et al. Diversity and flexibility of sex-change strategies in animals. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2006, 21:89-95.
47. West S.A. Sex Allocation 2009, Princeton University Press.
48. Warner R.R. Deferred reproduction as a response to sexual selection in a coral reef fish: a test of the life historical consequences. Evolution 1984, 38:148-162.
49. Warner R.R., Schultz E.T. Sexual selection and male characteristics in the bluehead wrasse, Thalassoma bifasciatum: mating site acquisition, mating site defense and female choice. Evolution 1992, 46:1421-1442.
50. Kazanci{dotless}oĝlu E. Sex allocation in hermaphrodites. Encyclopedia Life Sci. 2009, 10.1002/9780470015902.a0021911.
51. Koene J.M., Schulenburg H. Shooting darts: co-evolution and counter-adaptation in hermaphroditic snails. BMC Evol. Biol. 2005, 5:25.
52. Chase R., Blanchard K.C. The snail's love-dart delivers mucus to increase paternity. Proc. R. Soc. B 2006, 273:1471-1475.
53. Schärer L., et al. Mating behaviour of the marine turbellarian Macrostomum sp.: these worms suck. Mar. Biol. 2004, 145:373-380.
54. Koene J.M., et al. The fate of received sperm in the reproductive tract of a hermaphroditic snail and its implications for fertilisation. Evol. Ecol. 2009, 23:533-543.
55. Michiels N.K. Mating conflicts and sperm competition in simultaneous hermaphrodites. Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection 1998, 219-254. Academic Press. T.R. Birkhead, A.P. Møller (Eds.).
56. Fischer E.A. The relationship between mating system and simultaneous hermaphroditism in the coral reef fish, Hypoplectrus nigricans (Serranidae). Anim. Behav. 1980, 28:620-633.
57. Leonard J.L. Sexual conflict in simultaneous hermaphrodites: evidence from serranid fishes. Environ. Biol. Fish. 1993, 36:135-148.
58. Anthes N., et al. Gender trading in a hermaphrodite. Curr. Biol. 2005, 15:R792-R793.
59. Schärer L., et al. Mating behaviour and the evolution of sperm design. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:1490-1495.
60. Michiels N.K., Newman L.J. Sex and violence in hermaphrodites. Nature 1998, 391:647.
61. Janicke T., Schärer L. Sex allocation predicts mating rate in a simultaneous hermaphrodite. Proc. R. Soc. B 2009, 276:4247-4253.
62. Klinkhamer P.G.L., et al. Sex and size in cosexual plants. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1997, 12:260-265.
63. Schärer L. Tests of sex allocation theory in simultaneously hermaphroditic animals. Evolution 2009, 63:1377-1405.