Preferences versus adaptation during Referring Expression Generation

ACL 2010 - 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 55-59

  Goudbeek, Martijn ^a   Krahmer, Emiel ^a  

^a TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CURRENT GENERATION; GENERATION ALGORITHM;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

ALGORITHMS;

EID: 84859976374     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Jennifer Arnold. 2008. Reference production: Production-internal and addressee-oriented processes. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(4):495-527.
2. Holly P. Branigan, Martin J. Pickering, Jamie Pearson, and Janet F. McLean. in press. Linguistic alignment between people and computers. Journal of Pragmatics, 23:1-2.
3. Susan E. Brennan and Herbert H. Clark. 1996. Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22:1482-1493.
4. Hendrik Buschmeier, Kirsten Bergmann, and Stefan Kopp. 2009. An alignment-capable microplanner for Natural Language Generation. In Proceedings of the 12th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation (ENLG 2009), pages 82-89, Athens, Greece, March. Association for Computational Linguistics.
5. Robert Dale and Ehud Reiter. 1995. Computational interpretations of the gricean maxims in the generation of referring expressions. Cognitive Science, 19(2):233-263.
6. Paul E. Engelhardt, Karl G. Bailey, and Fernanda Ferreira. 2006. Do speakers and listeners observe the gricean maxim of quantity? Journal of Memory and Language, 54(4):554-573.
7. Albert Gatt, Ielka van der Sluis, and Kees van Deemter. 2007. Evaluating algorithms for the generation of referring expressions using a balanced corpus. In Proceedings of the 11th EuropeanWorkshop on Natural Language Generation.
8. Srinivasan Janarthanam and Oliver Lemon. 2009. Learning lexical alignment policies for generating referring expressions for spoken dialogue systems. In Proceedings of the 12th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation (ENLG 2009), pages 74-81, Athens, Greece, March. Association for Computational Linguistics.
9. Ruud Koolen, Albert Gatt, Martijn Goudbeek, and Emiel Krahmer. 2009. Need I say more? on factors causing referential overspecification. In Proceedings of the PRE-CogSci 2009 Workshop on the Production of Referring Expressions: Bridging the Gap Between Computational and Empirical Approaches to Reference.
10. Emiel Krahmer, Sebastiaan van Erk, and André Verleg. 2003. Graph-based generation of referring expressions. Computational Linguistics, 29(1):53-72.
11. Robert Malouf. 2000. The order of prenominal adjectives in natural language generation. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 85-92.
12. Chris Mellish, Donia Scott, Lynn Cahill, Daniel Paiva, Roger Evans, and Mike Reape. 2006. A reference architecture for natural language generation systems. Natural Language Engineering, 12:1-34.
13. Margaret Mitchell. 2009. Class-based ordering of prenominal modifiers. In ENLG '09: Proceedings of the 12th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation, pages 50-57, Morristown, NJ, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
14. Thomas Pechmann. 1989. Incremental speech production and referential overspecification. Linguistics, 27:89-110.
15. Martin Pickering and Simon Garrod. 2004. Towards a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 27:169-226.
16. Ehud Reiter and Robert Dale. 2000. Building Natural Language Generation Systems. Cambridge University Press.
17. James Shaw and Vasileios Hatzivassiloglou. 1999. Ordering among premodifiers. In Proceedings of the 37th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Computational Linguistics, pages 135-143.