Effects of scene variation on referential overspecification

Expanding the Space of Cognitive Science - Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 1025-1030

  Koolen, Ruud ^a   Goudbeek, Martijn ^a   Krahmer, Emiel ^a  

^a TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

computational models; Referential overspecification; scene variation

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS;

COMPUTATIONAL MODELLING; OVERSPECIFICATION; REFERENTIAL OVERSPECIFICATION; REFERRING EXPRESSIONS; SCENE VARIATION; TARGET DESCRIPTIONS; VISUAL SCENE;

COMPUTATION THEORY;

EID: 84859969020     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Arnold, J. E. (2008). Reference production: production-internal and addressee-oriented processes. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23 (4), 495-527.
2. Arts, A., Maes, A., Noordman, L., & Jansen, C. (2011). Overspecification facilitates object identification. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 361-374.
3. Bach, K. (1994). Thought and reference. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
4. Belke, E., & Meyer, A. (2002). Tracking the time course of multidimensional stimulus discrimination: Analysis of viewing patterns and processing times during “same” “different” decisions. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 14, 237-266.
5. th annual meeting of the association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 68-75). University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
6. Dale, R. & Reiter, E. (1995). Computational interpretations of the Gricean maxims in the generation of referring expressions. Cognitive Science, 18, 233-263.
7. van Deemter, K., Gatt, A., van Gompel, R. & Krahmer, E. (accepted). Computational linguistics of reference production. Topics in Cognitive Science.
8. Gatt, A., van der Sluis, I., van Deemter, K. (2007). Evaluating algorithms for the generation of referring expressions using a balanced corpus. Proceedings of the European Workshop on Natural Language Generation (ENLG) (pp. 49-56). Saarbruecken, Germany.
9. Gauthier, I., & Tarr, M. (1997). Becoming a Greeble expert: exploring mechanisms for face recognition. Vision research, 37, 1673-1682.
10. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In: P. Cole, & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Speech Acts. Academic Press, New York.
11. th Scandinavian Conference on Linguistics. Turku, Finland.
12. Engelhardt, P. E., Bailey, K. G. D., & Ferreira, F. (2006). Do speakers and listeners observe the Gricean maxim of quantity? Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 554-573.
13. Koolen, R., Gatt, A., Goudbeek, M., & Krahmer, E. Overspecification in referring expressions: causal factors and language differences. Submitted.
14. Maes, A., Arts, A. & Noordman, L. (2004). Reference management in instructive discourse. Discourse Processes, 37, 117-144.
15. Mellish, C., Scott, D., Cahill, L., Evans, R., Paiva, D., & Reape, M. (2006). A reference architecture for Natural Language Generation systems. Natural Language Engineering 12 (1), 1-34.
16. Nadig, A. S., & Sedivy, J. C. (2002). Evidence of perspective-taking constraints in children's on-line reference resolution. Psychological Science, 13, 329-336.
17. Paraboni, I., van Deemter, K., & Masthoff, J. (2007). Making referents easy to identify. Computational Linguistics, 33, 229-254.
18. Pechmann, T. (1989). Incremental speech production and referential overspecification. Linguistics 27, 89-110.
19. Reiter, E. & Dale, R. (2000). Building Natural Language Generation sytems. Cambridge University Press.
20. Schriefers, H. & Pechmann, T. (1988). Incremental production of referential noun phrases by human speakers. In: M. Zock, & G. Sabah (Eds.), Advances in Natural Language Generation, volume 1. Pinter, London.
21. Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1982). Judgement under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgement under uncertainty, heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.