Influence of vibration on workload while reading and writing on Indian trains

Contemporary Ergonomics 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 40-45

  Hancock, R ^a   Mansfield, N J ^a   Goel, V K ^b   Narayanamoorthy, R ^b  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ROORKEE   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTROL MODEL; NASA-TLX; RANDOM VIBRATIONS; SUBJECTIVE WORKLOAD; TASK DIFFICULTY; THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK; WHOLE BODY VIBRATION;

NASA;

ERGONOMICS;

EID: 84859963359     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (6)

1. Hockey, G.R., 1997. Compensatory control in the regulation ofhuman performance under stress and high workload: A cognitive-energetical framework. Biological Psychology, 45, 73-93.
2. Louhevaara and Kilbom, 2005. Dynamic Work Assessment. In J. Wilson and N. Corlett (Eds.) Evaluation of Human Work. 3rd Edition. (CRC Press, London).
3. Mansfield, N.J. (2005). Human Response to Vibration. (CRC Press, Boca Raton).
4. Mansfield, N.J. and Maeda, S. (2007). The apparent mass of the seated human exposed to single-axis and multi-axis whole-body vibration. Journal of Biomechanics, 40, 2543-2551. (Pubitemid 47082518)
5. Miller Guron, L. and Lundberg, I. 2004. Error Patterns in Word Reading Among Primary School Children: A Cross-orthographic Study. Dyslexia, 10, 44-60. (Pubitemid 39419602)
6. Sundström, J. 2006, Difficulties to read and write under lateral vibration exposure: contextual studies of train passengers' ride comfort. KTH Doctoral Thesis, Stockholm, Sweden.