Endoscopist-directed propofol administration versus anesthesiologist assistance for colorectal cancer screening: A cost-effectiveness analysis

Endoscopy

Volumn 44, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 456-461

  Hassan, C ^a   Rex, D K ^b   Cooper, G S ^c   Benamouzig, R ^d  

^a NUOVO REGINA MARGHERITA HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF CLEVELAND   (United States)

^d AVICENNE HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROPOFOL;

ADULT; AGED; ANESTHESIST; ARTICLE; CANCER SCREENING; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; ENDOSCOPIST; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNITED STATES;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANESTHESIOLOGY; ANESTHETICS, INTRAVENOUS; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; COST SAVINGS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FRANCE; GASTROENTEROLOGY; HUMANS; MARKOV CHAINS; MIDDLE AGED; NURSE ANESTHETISTS; PROPOFOL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84859933344     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: 14388812     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1308936     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Edwards BK, Ward E, Kohler BA et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2006, featuring colorectal cancer trends and impact of interventions (risk factors, screening, and treatment) to reduce future rates. Cancer: 2010; 116 544 573
2. Baxter NN, Goldwasser MA, Paszat LF et al. Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med: 2009; 150 1 8
3. Rex DK, Johnson DA, Anderson JC et al. American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009. Am J Gastroenterol: 2009; 104 739 750
4. Cohen LB, Ladas SD, Vargo JJ et al. Sedation in digestive endoscopy: the Athens international position statement. Aliment Pharmacol Ther: 2010; PMID: 20456310
5. Ulmer BJ, Hansen JJ, Overley CA et al. Propofol versus midazolam/fentanyl for outpatient colonoscopy: administration by nurses supervised by endoscopists. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol: 2003; 1 425 432 (Pubitemid 37413605)
6. Huang R, Eisen GM. Efficacy, safety, and limitations in current practice of sedation and analgesia. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am: 2004; 14 269 288 (Pubitemid 38581883)
7. Rex DK. Review article: moderate sedation for endoscopy: sedation regimens for non-anaesthesiologists. Aliment Pharmacol Ther: 2006; 24 163 171 (Pubitemid 43972888)
8. Aisenberg J, Brill JV, Ladabaum U et al. Sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy: new practices, new economics. Am J Gastroenterol: 2005; 100 996 1000 (Pubitemid 40769032)
9. Dumonceau JM, Riphaus A, Aparicio JR et al. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates, and the European Society of Anaesthesiology Guideline: Non-anesthesiologist administration of propofol for GI endoscopy. Endoscopy: 2010; 42 960 974
10. Rex DK, Heuss LT, Walker JA et al. Trained registered nurses/endoscopy teams can administer propofol safely for endoscopy. Gastroenterology: 2005; 129 1384 1391 (Pubitemid 41597380)
11. Rex DK, Deenadayalu VP, Eid E et al. Endoscopist-directed administration of propofol: a worldwide safety experience. Gastroenterology: 2009; 137 1229 1237
12. Nelson AL, Cohen JT, Greenberg D et al. Much cheaper, almost as good: decrementally cost-effective medical innovation. Ann Intern Med: 2009; 151 662 667
13. Warren JL, Klabunde CN, Schrag D et al. Overview of the SEER-Medicare data: content, research applications, and generalizability to the UNited States elderly population. Med Care: 2002; 40 08 IV-3-18
14. United States Department of Labor. Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer price index for all urban consumers (CPI-U), U.S. city average, medical care. Available at: www. bls.gov/cpi/home.htm Accessed: 2010 Oct 14
15. United States Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics. Available at: http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes291111.htm#nat Accessed: 28.9.2010
16. American Board of Internal Medicine Available at: http://www.abim.org/ pdf/data-candidates-certified/all-candidates.pdf Accessed: 2010 Sep 28
17. Vijan S, Inadomi J, Hayward RA et al. Projections of demand and capacity for colonoscopy related to increasing rates of colorectal cancer screening in the United States. Aliment Pharmacol Ther: 2004; 20 507 515 (Pubitemid 39243896)
18. Vital signs: colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 50-75 years - United States, 2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep: 2010; 59 808 812
19. Seeff LC, Manninen DL, Dong FB et al. Is there endoscopic capacity to provide colorectal cancer screening to the unscreened population in the United States? Gastroenterology: 2004; 127 1661 1669 (Pubitemid 39575844)
20. Hassan C, Pickhardt PJ, Rex DK. A resect and discard strategy would improve cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol: 2010; 8 865 869, e1-3 (Epub 2010 Jun 1)
21. Census Bureau Available at: http://www.census.gov Accessed: 2010 Sep 28
22. Tengs TO, Wallace A. One thousand health-related quality-of-life estimates. Med Care: 2000; 38 583 637
23. Hassan C, Benamouzig R, Spada C et al. Cost effectiveness and projected national impact of colorectal cancer screening in France. Endoscopy: 2011; 43 780 793. Epub 2011 May 27
24. Institut National de la Statistique et des tudes conomiques Available at: http://www.insee.fr/fr/themes/tableau.asp?reg-id=0&ref-id=NATTEF06114
25. Conseil National de l'Ordre des Mdecins Available at: http://www.conseil-national.medecin.fr/system/files/Atlas2011.pdf?download=1
26. Rogge JD, Elmore MF, Mahoney SJ et al. Low-cost, office-based, screening colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol: 1994; 89 1775 1780 (Pubitemid 24320539)
27. Pignone M, Saha S, Hoerger T et al. Cost-effectiveness analyses of colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review for the U. S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med: 2002; 137 96 104 (Pubitemid 34779153)
28. Inadomi JM, Gunnarsson CL, Rizzo JA et al. Projected increased growth rate of anesthesia professional-delivered sedation for colonoscopy and EGD in the United States: 2009 to 2015. Gastrointest Endosc: 2010; 72 580 586 (Epub 2010 Jul 13)
29. The CMS Hospital Conditions of Participation and Interpretive Guidelines. Available at: http://www.hcmarketplace.com/supplemental/8987-browse.pdf Accessed: 2010 Sep 28
30. Hassan C, Hunink MG, Laghi A et al. Value-of-information analysis to guide future research in colorectal cancer screening. Radiology: 2009; 253 745 752
31. Loeve F, Boer R, Zauber AG et al. National Polyp Study data: evidence for regression of adenomas. Int J Cancer: 2004; 111 633 639 (Pubitemid 39045333)
32. Hofstad B, Vatn M, Larsen S et al. Growth of colorectal polyps: redetection and evaluation of unresected polyps for a period of three years. Gut: 1996; 39 449 456 (Pubitemid 26338537)
33. Hoff G, Foerster A, Vatn MH et al. Epidemiology of polyps in the rectum and colon. Recovery and evaluation of unresected polyps 2 years after detection. Scand J Gastroenterol: 1986; 21 853 862 (Pubitemid 16015074)
34. Ries LA, Kosary CL, Hankey BF et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1973-1994. Bethesda, Maryland National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute: 1997; NIH Publication. 97-2789
35. Chen CD, Yen MF, Wang WM et al. A case-cohort study for the disease natural history of adenoma-carcinoma and de novo carcinoma and surveillance of colon and rectum after polypectomy: implication for efficacy of colonoscopy. Br J Cancer: 2003; 88 1866 1873
36. Ladabaum U, Chopra CL, Huang G et al. Aspirin as an adjunct to screening for prevention of sporadic colorectal cancer. A cost-effectiveness analysis. Ann Intern Med: 2001; 135 769 781 (Pubitemid 33051261)
37. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results. http://seer.cancer.gov/ faststats/ Available at: www.cdc.gov Accessed: 2009 15 Sep
38. Seeff LC, Manninen DL, Dong FB et al. Is there endoscopic capacity to provide colorectal cancer screening to the unscreened population in the United States? Gastroenterology: 2004; 127 1661 1669 (Pubitemid 39575844)
39. Hixson LJ, Fennerty MB, Sampliner RE et al. Prospective blinded trial of the colonoscopic miss-rate of large colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc: 1991; 37 125 127
40. Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology: 1997; 112 24 28 (Pubitemid 27008981)
41. Levin TR, Zhao W, Conell C et al. Complications of colonoscopy in an integrated health care delivery system. Ann Intern Med: 2006; 145 880 886 (Pubitemid 351639963)
42. Church JM. Clinical significance of small colorectal polyps. Dis Colon Rectum: 2004; 47 481 485 (Pubitemid 38436654)
43. Odom SR, Duffy SD, Barone JE et al. The rate of adenocarcinoma in endoscopically removed colorectal polyps. Am Surg: 2005; 71 1024 1026
44. Butterly LF, Chase MP, Pohl H et al. Prevalence of clinically important histology in small adenomas. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol: 2006; 4 343 348 (Pubitemid 43343891)
45. Gschwantler M, Kriwanek S, Langner E et al. High-grade dysplasia and invasive carcinoma in colorectal adenomas: a multivariate analysis of the impact of adenoma and patient characteristics. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol: 2002; 14 183 188 (Pubitemid 34163998)
46. Lieberman D, Moravec M, Holub J et al. Polyp size and advanced histology in patients undergoing colonoscopy screening: implications for CT colonography. Gastroenterology: 2008; 135 1100 1105
47. Brenner H, Arndt V, Sturmer T et al. Long-lasting reduction of risk of colorectal cancer following screening endoscopy. Br J Cancer: 2001; 85 972 976 (Pubitemid 33015999)
48. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN. The National Polyp Study Workgroup et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. N Engl J Med: 1993; 329 1977 1981 (Pubitemid 24015040)
49. Muller AD, Sonnenberg A. Prevention of colorectal cancer by flexible endoscopy. A case-control study of 32,702 veterans. Ann Intern Med: 1995; 123 904 910
50. Sonnenberg A, Delco F, Inadomi JM. Cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med: 2000; 133 573 584
51. Ladabaum U, Song K. Projected national impact of colorectal cancer screening on clinical and economic outcomes and health services demand. Gastroenterology: 2005; 129 1151 1162 (Pubitemid 41446855)
52. Vijan S, Hwang EW, Hofer TP et al. Which colon cancer screening test? A comparison of costs, effectiveness, and compliance. Am J Med: 2001; 111 593 601 (Pubitemid 34088068)