Accuracy of visual estimation in classifying effort during a lifting task

Work

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 445-457

  Schapmire, Darrell W ^a   St James, James D ^b   Townsend, Robert ^c   Feeler, Larry ^d  

^a X RTS Software Products and Testing Devices   (United States)

^b MILLIKIN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c WCS Occupational Rehabilitation Sports Medicine   (United States)

^d WorkSTEPS Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Functional capacity evaluation (FCE); Kinesiophysical; Lifting evaluation; Psychophysical

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; VISION; WORK CAPACITY; WORKLOAD;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIFTING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PHYSICAL EXERTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION; WORK CAPACITY EVALUATION; WORKLOAD;

EID: 84859929330     PISSN: 10519815     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-2011-1256     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. S. Anstis, Picturing peripheral acuity, Perception 27 (1998), 817-825.
2. S. Brouwer, M.F. Reneman, P.U. Dijkstra, J.W. Groothoff, J.M. Schellekens and L.N. Göeken, Test-retest reliability of the Isernhagen Work Systems functional capacity evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain, J Occup Rehabil 13 (2003), 207-218.
3. P.N. Brubaker, F.J. Fearon, S.M. Smith, R.J. McKibben, J. Alday, S.S. Andrews, E. Clarke and G.L. Shaw, Sensitivity and specificity of the Blankenship FCE system’s indicators of submaximal effort, J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 37 (2007), 161-168.
4. S.H. Ciriello, S.H. Snook, A.C. Blick and P.L.Wilkinson, The effects of task duration on psychophysically-determined maximum acceptable weights and forces, Ergonomics 2 (1990), 187-200.
5. V.M. Ciriello, S.H. Snook and G.J. Hughes, Further studies of psychophysically determined maximumacceptable weights and forces, Hum Factors 35 (1993), 175-186.
6. S. Coren, L.M. Ward and J.T.Enns, Sensation and Perception, 6e. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley, 2004.
7. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993).
8. M.J. Durand, P. Loisel, S. Poitras, R. Mercier, S.R. Stock and J. Lemaire, The interrater reliability of a functional capacity evaluation: the physical work performance evaluation, J Occup Rehabil 14 (2004), 119-129.
9. L. Feeler, WorkSTEPS Class Manual, 2008, Austin, TX.
10. A. Garg, D.B. Chaffin and G.D. Herrin, Effects of lifting frequency and technique on physical fatigue with special reference to psychophysical methodology and metabolic rate, Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 40 (1979), 894-903.
11. V. Gouttebarge, H. Wind, P.P. Kuijer, J.K. Sluiter and M.H. Frings-Dresen, Intra- and interrater reliability of the Ergo-Kit functional capacity evaluation method in adults without musculoskeletal complaints, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 86 (2005), 2354-2360.
12. V. Gouttebarge, H. Wind, P.P. Kuijer, J.K. Sluiter and M.H. Frings-Dresen, Reliability and agreement of 5 Ergo-Kit functional capacity evaluation lifting tests in subjects with low back pain, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87 (2006), 1365-1370.
13. V. Gouttebarge, H.Wind, P.P. Kuijer and M.H. Frings-Dresen, Reliability and validity of Functional Capacity Evaluation methods: a systematic review with reference to Blankenship system, Ergos work simulator, Ergo-Kit and Isernhagen work system, Int Arch Occup Environ Health Epub 77 (2004), 527-537.
14. D.P. Gross and M.C. Battié, Reliability of safe maximum lifting determinations of a functional capacity evaluation, Phys Ther 82 (2002), 364-371.
15. P. Hallett, Eye movements, in: Handbook of Perception and Human Performance: Volume 1 Sensory Processes and Perception, K. Boff, L. Kaufman and J. Thomas, eds, Toronto:Wiley-Interscience, 1986, pp. 10-1 to 10-112.
16. A.P. Hodselmans, P.U. Dijkstra, C. van der Schans and J.H. Geertzen, Test-retest reliability of psychophysical lift capacity in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain and healthy subjects, J Rehabil Med 39 (2007), 133-137.
17. S. IJmker, E.H. Gerrits and M.F. Reneman, Upper lifting performance of healthy young adults in functional capacity evaluations:a comparison of two protocols, J Occup Rehabil 13 (2003), 297-305.
18. S.L. Isernhagen, D.L. Hart and L.M.Matheson, Reliability of independent observer judgments of level of lift effort in a Kinesiophysical functional capacity evaluation, Work 12 (1999), 145-150.
19. M.A. Jay, J.M. Lamb, R.L. Watson, I.A. Young, F.J. Fearon, J.M. Alday and A.G. Tindall, Sensitivity and specificity of the indicators of sincere effort of the EPIC lift capacity test on a previously injured population, Spine 25 (2000), 1405-1412.
20. D.E. Lechner, J.R. Jackson, D.L. Roth and K.V. Straaton, Reliability and validity of a newly developed test of physical work performance, J Occup Med 36 (1994), 997-1004.
21. M. Lemstra, W.P. Olszynski and W. Enright, The sensitivity and specificity of functional capacity evaluations in determining maximal effort: a randomized trial, Spine 29 (2004), 953-959.
22. H. Lygren, T. Dragesund, J. Joensen, T. Ask and R. Moe-Nilssen, Test-rest reliability of the progressive isoinertial lifting evaluation (PILE), Spine 30 (2005), 1070-1074.
23. L.N. Matheson, V. Mooney, J.E. Grant, M. Affleck, H. Hall, T, Melles, R.L. Lichter andG.McIntosh, Spine, Atest tomeasure lift capacity of physically impaired adults. Part 1-development and reliability testing, 20 (1995), 2119-2129.
24. J.Mecham, Under closer scrutiny: functional capacity evaluations must be evidence based and valid, Advance for Directors in Rehabilitation, June 2008, pp. 47-48.
25. A. Mital, The psychophysical approach in manual lifting - a verification study, Human Factors 25 (1983), 485-491.
26. M.F. Reneman, S.M. Jaegers, M.Westmaas and L.N. Göeken, The reliability of determining effort level of lifting and carrying in a functional capacity evaluation, Work 18 (2002), 23-27.
27. M.F. Reneman, P.U. Dijkstra, M.Westmaas and L.N. Göeken, Test-retest reliability of lifting and carrying in a 2-day functional capacity evaluation, J Occup Rehabil 12 (2002), 269-275.
28. M.R. Reneman, S. Brouwer, A. Meinema, P.U. Dijkstra, J.H. Geertzen and J.W. Groothoff, Test-retest reliability of the Isernhagen Work Systems functional capacity evaluation in healthy adults, J Occup Rehabil 14 (2004), 295-305.
29. M.R. Reneman, Introduction to the special issue on functional capacity evaluations: from expert based to evidence based, J Occup Rehabil 13 (2003), 203-205.
30. M.F. Reneman, A.S. Fokkens, P.U. Dijkstra, J.H. Geertzen and J.W. Groothoff, Testing lifting capacity: validity of determining effort level by means of observation, Spine 30 (2005), E40-E46.
31. R.A. Robergs and R. Landwehr, The surprising history of the "HRmax = 220-age equation, J Exercise Phys Online 5 (2002). May, pp. 1-10. [Available from: http://www.faculty. css.edu/tboone2/asep/May2002JEPonline.html].
32. S. Runeson and G. Frykholm, Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person-and-action perception:expectation, gender, recognition and deceptive intent, J Exper Psych 112 (1983), 585-615.
33. G. Rustenburg, P.P. Kuijer and M.H. Frings-Dresen, The concurrent validity of the ERGOS Work Simulator and the Ergo-Kit with respect tomaximum lifting capacity, J Occup Rehabil 14 (2004), 107-118.
34. D.J. Simons and C.F. Chabris, Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness to dynamic events, Perception 28 (1999), 1059-1074.
35. G. Simons, Credibility crisis in FCEs, Physical Therapy Products, October 2006, 3.
36. S.H. Snook and C.H. Irvine, Maximum acceptable weight of lift, Am Indus Hyg Assoc J 28(1967), 322-329.
37. S.H. Snook, C.H. Irvine and S.F. Bass, Maximum weights and work loads acceptable to male industrial workers, Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 31 (1970), 579-586.
38. S.H. Snook and V.M. Ciriello, Maximum weights and work loads acceptable to female workers, J Occup Med 8 (1974), 527-534.
39. R.L. Smith, Therapists’ ability to identify safe maximum lifting in low back pain patients during functional capacity evaluation, J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 19(5) (1994), 277-281.
40. R. Soer, E.H. Gerrits andM.F. Reneman, Test-retest reliability of aWRULD functional capacity evaluation in healthy adults, Work 26 (2006), 273-280.
41. R. Soer, B.J. Poels, J.H. Geertzen and M.F. Reneman, A comparison of two lifting assessment approaches in patients with chronic low back pain, J Occup Rehabil 16 (2006), 639-646.
42. R.J. Smeets, H.J. Hijdra, A.D. Kester, M.H. Hitters and J.A. Knottnerus, The usability of six physical performance tasks in a rehabilitation population with chronic low back pain, Clin Rehabil 20 (2006), 989-997.
43. J.D. St. James, D.W. Schapmire, R. Townsend, L. Feeler and J. Kleinkort, Simultaneous, bilateral hand strength testing in a client population, part II: relationship to a distraction-based lifting evaluation, Work 37(4) (1 Jan 2010), 395-403.
44. N.L. Tuckwell, L. Straker and T.E. Barrett, Test-retest reliability on nine tasks of the PhysicalWork Performance Evaluation, Work 19 (2002), 243-253.