The distributional inclusion hypotheses and lexical entailment

ACL-05 - 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 107-114

  Geffet, Maayan ^a   Dagan, Ido ^b  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^b BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SEMANTICS;

DATA SPARSENESS; DISTRIBUTIONAL SIMILARITIES; SEMANTIC SIMILARITY; TESTING ALGORITHM; WEB-BASED FEATURES; WORD SENSE;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

EID: 84859922478     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1219840.1219854     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Chklovski, Timothy and Patrick Pantel. 2004. VERBOCEAN: Mining the Web for Fine-Grained Semantic Verb Relations. In Proc. of EMNLP-04. Barcelona, Spain.
2. Church, Kenneth W. and Hanks Patrick. 1990. Word association norms, mutual information, and Lexicography. Computational Linguistics, 16(1), pp. 22-29.
3. Dagan, Ido. 2000. Contextual Word Similarity, in Rob Dale, Hermann Moisl and Harold Somers (Eds.), Handbook of Natural Language Processing, Marcel Dekker Inc, 2000, Chapter 19, pp. 459-476.
4. Dagan, Ido, Oren Glickman and Bernardo Magnini. 2005. The PASCAL Recognizing Textual Entailment Challenge. In Proc. of the PASCAL Challenges Workshop for Recognizing Textual Entailment. Southampton, U.K.
5. Geffet, Maayan and Ido Dagan, 2004. Feature Vector Quality and Distributional Similarity. In Proc. of Coling-04. Geneva. Switzerland.
6. Grefenstette, Gregory. 1994. Exploration in Automatic Thesaurus Discovery. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
7. Harris, Zelig S. Mathematical structures of language. Wiley, 1968.
8. Hearst, Marti. 1992. Automatic acquisition of hyponyms from large text corpora. In Proc. of COLING-92. Nantes, France.
9. Keller, Frank, Maria Lapata, and Olga Ourioupina. 2002. Using the Web to Overcome Data Sparseness. In Jan Hajic and Yuji Matsumoto, eds., In Proc. of EMNLP-02. Philadelphia, PA.
10. Lee, Lillian. 1997. Similarity-Based Approaches to Natural Language Processing. Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
11. Lin, Dekang. 1993. Principle-Based Parsing without Overgeneration. In Proc. of ACL-93. Columbus, Ohio.
12. Lin, Dekang. 1998. Automatic Retrieval and Clustering of Similar Words. In Proc. of COLING-ACL98, Montreal, Canada.
13. Moldovan, Dan, Badulescu, A., Tatu, M., Antohe, D., and Girju, R. 2004. Models for the semantic classification of noun phrases. In Proc. of HLT/NAACL-2004 Workshop on Computational Lexical Semantics. Boston.
14. Pado, Sebastian and Mirella Lapata. 2003. Constructing semantic space models from parsed corpora. In Proc. of ACL-03, Sapporo, Japan.
15. Pantel, Patrick and Dekang Lin. 2002. Discovering Word Senses from Text. In Proc. of ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD-02). Edmonton, Canada.
16. Pereira, Fernando, Tishby Naftali, and Lee Lillian. 1993. Distributional clustering of English words. In Proc. of ACL-93. Columbus, Ohio.
17. Ravichandran, Deepak and Eduard Hovy. 2002. Learning Surface Text Patterns for a Question Answering System. In Proc. of ACL-02. Philadelphia, PA.
18. Ruge, Gerda. 1992. Experiments on linguisticallybased term associations. Information Processing & Management, 28(3), pp. 317-332.
19. Weeds, Julie and David Weir. 2003. A General Framework for Distributional Similarity. In Proc. of EMNLP-03. Sapporo, Japan.
20. Weeds, Julie, D. Weir, D. McCarthy. 2004. Characterizing Measures of Lexical Distributional Similarity. In Proc. of Coling-04. Geneva, Switzerland.