Assessing contextual descriptive features for plot-based classification of urban areas

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 106, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 124-137

  Hermosilla, T ^a   Ruiz, L A ^a   Recio, J A ^a   Cambra Lopez M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Classification; Contextual features; High resolution imagery; Land use mapping; LiDAR; Urban areas

Indexed keywords

LAND USE; MAPPING; OPTICAL RADAR; SEMANTICS;

CLASSIFICATION APPROACH; CONTEXTUAL FEATURE; HIGH RESOLUTION IMAGERY; HIGH SPATIAL RESOLUTION IMAGERY; INTEGRATING INFORMATION; LAND-USE MAPPINGS; MEDITERRANEAN URBAN AREAS; URBAN AREAS;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; DATABASE; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEM; IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; LAND CLASSIFICATION; LAND USE; LIDAR; MAPPING METHOD; PATTERN RECOGNITION; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; TYPOLOGY; URBAN AREA;

EID: 84859922273     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.02.008     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Alberti M., Waddell P. An integrated urban development and ecological simulation model. Integrated Assessment 2000, 1:215-227.
2. Almeida J.P., Morley J.G., Dowman I.J. Graph theory in higher order topological analysis of urban scenes. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2007, 31(4):426-440.
3. Balaguer A., Ruiz L.A., Hermosilla T., Recio J.A. Definition of a comprehensive set of texture semivariogram features and their evaluation for object-oriented image classification. Computers & Geosciences 2010, 36(2):231-240.
4. Barnsley M.J., Barr S. A graph-based structural pattern recognition system to infer land use from fine spatial resolution land cover data. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 1997, 21:209-225.
5. Barnsley M.J., Barr S.L. Monitoring urban land use by Earth observation. Surveys in Geophysics 2000, 21:269-289.
6. Barr S., Barnsley M. A syntactic pattern recognition paradigm for the derivation of second-order thematic information from remotely-sensed image. Advances in remote sensing and GIS analysis 1998, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester. P. Atkinson, N. Tate (Eds.).
7. Bauer T., Steinnocher K. Per-parcel land use classification in urban areas applying a rule-based technique. GeoBIT/GIS 2001, 6:24-27.
8. Blaschke T. Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 2010, 65(1):2-16.
9. Boffet A., Coquerel C. Urban classification for generalization orchestration. The International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 2000, 38(B4):132-139.
10. Boffet A., Rocca-Serra S. Identification of spatial structures within urban blocks for town characterization. Proceedings of 20th international cartographic conference 2001, 1974-1983.
11. Bogaert J., Rousseau R., Hecke P.V., Impens I. Alternative area-perimeter ratios for measurement of 2D shape compactness of habitats. Applied Mathematics and Computation 2000, 111(1):71-85.
12. Bruzzone L., Carlin L. A multilevel context-based system for classification of very high spatial resolution images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2006, 44(9):2587-2600.
13. Burghardt D., Steiniger S. Usage of principal component analysis in the process of automated generalisation. Proceedings of XXII international cartographic conference, ICC2005 2005, 12.
14. Chatfield C. Avoiding statistical pitfalls. Statistical Science 1991, 6(3):240-252.
15. Congalton R. A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment 1991, 37(1):35-46.
16. Estornell J., Ruiz L.A., Velázquez-Martí B., Hermosilla T. Analysis of the factors affecting LiDAR DTM accuracy in a steep shrub area. International Journal of Digital Earth 2011, 4(6):521-538.
17. Eyton J.R. Urban land use classification and modeling using cover-type frequencies. Applied Geography 1993, 13:111-121.
18. Fukunaga K. Statistical pattern recognition 1990, Academic Press, New York.
19. Gastellu-Etchegorry J. An assessment of SPOT XS and Landsat MSS data for digital classification of near-urban land cover. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 1990, 11:225-235.
20. Haralick R.M., Shanmugan K., Dinstein I. Texture features for image classification. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 1973, 3:610-621.
21. Hay G.J., Castilla G. Object-based image analysis: Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT). The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 2006, 36(4/C42):3.
22. Hermosilla T., Ruiz L.A., Recio J.A., Estornell J. Evaluation of automatic building detection approaches combining high resolution images and LiDAR data. Remote Sensing 2011, 3(6):1188-1210.
23. Hernández-Orallo J., Ramírez-Quintana M.J., Ferri-Ramírez C. Introducción a la Minería de Datos 2004, Pearson Educación, S.A. Madrid, (in Spanish).
24. Herold M., Couclelis H., Clarke K.C. The role of spatial metrics in the analysis and modelling of urban land use change. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2005, 29(4):369-399.
25. Herold M., Liu X., Clarke K.C. Spatial metrics and image texture for mapping urban land use. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 2003, 69(9):991-1001.
26. Huck A., Hese S., Banzhaf E. Delineating parameters for object-based urban structure mapping in Santiago de Chile using QuickBird data. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 2011, 38(4/W19):6p.
27. Hussain M., Davies C., Barr R. Classifying buildings automatically: A methodology. Proceedings of the geographical information science research UK conference, GISUK 2007.
28. Krummel J.R., Gardner R.H., Sugihara G., O'Neill V., Coleman P.R. Landscape patterns in a disturbed environment. OIKOS 1987, 48(3):321-324.
29. Laskari S., Hanna S., Derix C. Urban identity through quantifiable spatial attributes: Coherence and dispersion of local identity through the automated comparative analysis of building block plans. Proceedings of the third international conference on design computing and cognition 2008, 615-634.
30. Matikainen L., Hyyppä J., Ahokas E., Markelin L., Kaartinen H. Automatic detection of buildings and changes in buildings for updating of maps. Remote Sensing 2010, 2(5):1217-1248.
31. McGarigal, K. & Marks, B. J. (1995). FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-351; Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA-Forest Service, Portland.
32. Murthy S.K. Automatic construction of decision trees from data: A multi-disciplinary survey. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 1998, 2(4):345-389.
33. Novack T., Kux H.J.H., Feitosa R.Q., Costa G.A. Per block urban land use interpretation using optical VHR data and the knowledge-based system interimage. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 2010, 38(4/C7):6p.
34. Quinlan J.R. C4.5. Programs for machine learning 1993, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo.
35. Ruiz L.A., Recio J.A., Fernández-Sarría A., Hermosilla T. A feature extraction software tool for agricultural object-based image analysis. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 2011, 76(2):284-296.
36. Sadler G.J., Barnsley M.J., Barr S.L. Information extraction from remotely sensed images for urban land analysis. Proceedings of the second European conference on geographical information systems, Vol. 2 1991, 955-964.
37. Steiniger S., Taillandier P., Weibel R. Utilising urban context recognition and machine learning to improve the generalisation of buildings. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2010, 24(2):253-282.
38. Sutton R.N., Hall E.L. Texture measures for automatic classification of pulmonary disease. IEEE Transactions on Computers 1972, 21(7):667-676.
39. Thomson M.K., Béra R. A methodology for inferring higher level semantic information from spatial databases. Proceedings of the geographical information science research UK conference 2008, 268-274.
40. Tzotsos A., Karantzalos K., Argialas D. Object-based image analysis through non-linear scale space filtering. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 2011, 66(1):2-16.
41. Valcárcel N., Villa G., Arozarena A., García-Asensio L., Caballero M.E., Porcuna A., et al. SIOSE, a successful test bench towards harmonization and integration of land cover/land use information as environmental referente data. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 2008, 37(B8):1159-1164.
42. Van de Voorde T., Van der Kwast J., Engelen G., Binard M., Cornet Y., Canters F. Quantifying intra-urban morphology of the Greater Dublin area with spatial metrics derived from medium resolution remote sensing data. Proceedings of the 7th international urban remote sensing conference, IEEE geoscience and remote sensing society 2009.
43. Vanderhaegen S., Canters F. Developing urban metrics to describe the morphology of urban areas at block level. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 2010, 38(4/C7):6p.
44. Welch R. Spatial resolution requirements for urban studies. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 1982, 3(2):139-146.
45. Wijnant J., Steenberghen T. Per-parcel classification of urban ikonos imagery. Proceedings of 7th AGILE conference on geographic information science 2004, 447-455.
46. Yoshida H., Omae M. An approach for analysis of urban morphology: Methods to derive morphological properties of city blocks by using an urban landscape model and their interpretations. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2005, 29(2):223-247.
47. Yu B., Liu H., Wu J., Hu Y., Zhang L. Automated derivation of urban building density information using airborne LiDAR data and object-based method. Landscape and Urban Planning 2010, 98(3-4):210-219.
48. Zaremski K. Differentiation between forms of urban development using the object-oriented classification method with central Warsaw as the example. Miscellanea Geographica 2006, 12:315-327.
49. Zhan Q., Molenaar M., Gorte B. Urban land use classes with fuzzy membership and classification based on integration of remote sensing and GIS. International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 2000, 33(B7):1751-1759.
50. Zhan Q., Molenaar M., Tempfli K. Finding spatial units for land use classification based on hierarchical image objects. The International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 2002, 34(4):6 p.
51. Zhan Q., Molenaar M., Tempfli K. Hierarchical image object based structural analysis toward urban land use classification using HR imagery and airborne lidar data. Proceedings of the 3rd symposium on remote sensing of urban areas 2002, 251-258.
52. Zhang L., Wu J., Zhen Y., Shu J. A GIS-based gradient analysis of urban landscape pattern of Shanghai metropolitan area, China. Landscape and Urban Planning 2004, 69(1):1-16.