Resource partitioning in relation to cohabitation of Lactobacillus species in the mouse forestomach

ISME Journal

Volumn 6, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 927-938

  Tannock, Gerald W ^a   Wilson, Charlotte M ^a   Loach, Diane ^a   Cook, Gregory M ^a   Eason, Jocelyn ^b   O'Toole, Paul W ^c   Holtrop, Grietje ^d   Lawley, Blair ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^b THE NEW ZEALAND INSTITUTE FOR PLANT AND FOOD RESEARCH LIMITED   (New Zealand)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE CORK   (Ireland)

^d ROWETT RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

adaptation; gut; lactobacilli; mathematical model; niche; resource partitioning

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL DNA; GLUCOSE; MALTOSE; TRANSCRIPTOME;

ADAPTATION; BACTERIUM; CARBOHYDRATE; COHABITATION; COMMENSAL; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM; ENZYME ACTIVITY; GENE EXPRESSION; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; NICHE PARTITIONING; NUMERICAL MODEL; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; RODENT; TROPHIC LEVEL;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BAGG ALBINO MOUSE; CHEMISTRY; CULTURE MEDIUM; DNA MICROARRAY; FERMENTATION; GENETICS; GERMFREE ANIMAL; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; LACTOBACILLUS; LACTOBACILLUS REUTERI; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; MOUSE; PHYLOGENY; STOMACH; STOMACH JUICE; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; CULTURE MEDIA; DNA, BACTERIAL; FERMENTATION; GASTROINTESTINAL CONTENTS; GERM-FREE LIFE; GLUCOSE; LACTOBACILLUS; LACTOBACILLUS REUTERI; MALTOSE; MICE; MICE, INBRED BALB C; MODELS, THEORETICAL; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENY; STOMACH; TRANSCRIPTOME;

ANIMALIA; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); LACTOBACILLUS; LACTOBACILLUS JOHNSONII; LACTOBACILLUS REUTERI; LACTOBACILLUS REUTERI 100-23; MUS; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 84859919846     PISSN: 17517362     EISSN: 17517370     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2011.161     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Costello EK, Lauber CL, Hamady M, Fierer N, Gordon JI, Knight R. (2009). Bacterial community variation in human body habitats across space and time. Science 326: 1694-1697.
2. Fabich AJ, Jones SA, Chowdhury FZ, Cernosek A, Anderson A, Smalley D et al. (2008). Comparison of carbon nutrition for pathogenic and commensal Escherichia coli strains in the mouse intestine. Infect Immun 76: 1143-1152. (Pubitemid 351428075)
3. Garcia de al Nava J, Hijum van S, Trelles O 2003 PreP: Gene expression data pre-processing. Bioinformatics 19 2328-2329. (Pubitemid 37483995)
4. Gause GF, Witt AA. (1935). Behavior of mixed populations and the problem of natural selection. Amer Nat 69: 596-604.
5. Gill SR, Pop M, DeBoy RT, Eckburg PB, Turnbaugh PJ, Samuel BS et al. (2006). Metagenomic analysis of the human distal gut microbiome. Science 312: 1355-1359. (Pubitemid 43839542)
6. Giraud A, Arous S, de Parpe M, Gaboriau-Routhiau V, Bambou J-C, Rakotobe S et al. (2008). Dissecting the genetic components of adaptation of Escherichia coli in the mouse gut. PLoS Genet 4(1): E2.doi10.1371/ journal.pgen.0040002.
7. Hagen KE, Guan LL, Tannock GW, Korver DR, Allison GE. (2005). Detection, characterization, and in vitro and in vivo expression of genes encoding S-proteins in Lactobacillus gallinarum strains isolated from chicken crops. Appl Environ Microbiol 71: 6633-6643. (Pubitemid 43194146)
8. Hammes WP, Vogel RF. (1995). The genus Lactobacillus. In: Wood BJB, Holzapfel WH (eds). The Genera of Lactic Acid Bacteria. Blackie: London, UK, pp 19-54. The lactic acid bacteria (volume 2).
9. Hardin G. (1960). The competitive exclusion principle. Science 131: 1292-1297.
10. Hijum van SA, Jong de A, Baerends RJ, Karsens HA, Kramer NE, Larsen R et al. (2005). A generally applicable validation scheme for the assessment of factors involved in reproducibility and quality of DNA-microarray data. BMC Genomics 6: 77.
11. Hutchinson RE. (1965). The Ecological Theater and the Evolutionary Play. Yale University Press: New Haven, CT, USA, 139 pp.
12. Ley RE, Hamady M, Lozupone C, Turnbaugh PJ, Ramey RR, Bircher JS et al. (2008). Evolution of mammals and their gut microbes. Science 320: 1647-1651. (Pubitemid 351931256)
13. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. (2001). Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-deltadelta C(T) method. Methods 25: 402-408. (Pubitemid 34164012)
14. Long AD, Mangalam HJ, Chan BYP, Tolleri L, Hatfield GW, Baldi P. (2001). Improved statistical inference from DNA microarray data using analysis of variance and a Bayesian statistical framework. Analysis of global gene expression in Escherichia coli K12. J Biol Chem 276: 19937-19944.
15. Louie T, Miller M, Donskey C, Mullane K, Goldstein EJC. (2009). Clinical outcomes, safety and pharmacokinetics of fidaxomicin in a phase 2 trial of patients with Clostridium difficile infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53: 223-228.
16. Mahowald MA, Rey FE, Seedorf H, Turnbaigh PJ, Fulton RS, Wollam A et al. (2009). Characterizing a model human gut microbiota composed of members of its two dominant bacterial phyla. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 5859-5864.
17. Makarova K, Slesarev A, Wolf Y, Sorokin A, Mirkin B, Koonin E et al. (2006). Comparative genomics of the lactic acid bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 15611-15616. (Pubitemid 44625640)
18. Marco ML, Kleerebezem M. (2008). Asssessment of real-time RT-PCR for quantification of Lactobacillus plantarum gene expression during stationary phase and nutrient starvation. J Appl Microbiol 104: 587-594.
19. Markwell MA, Haas SM, Bieber LL, Tolbert NE. (1978). A modification of the Lowry procedure to simplify protein determination in membrane and lipoprotein samples. Anal Biochem 87: 206-210. (Pubitemid 9050428)
20. Rozen S, Skaletsky H. (2000). Primer 3 on the WWW for general users and for biological programmers. In: Krawetz S, Misener S (eds). Bioinformatics Methods and Protocols: Methods in Molecular Biology. Human Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, pp 365-386.
21. Russell WM, Klaenhammer TR. (2001). Efficient system for directed integration into the Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus gasseri chromosomes via homologous recombination. Appl Environ Microbiol 67: 4361-4364. (Pubitemid 33641741)
22. Tannock GW, Crichton C, Welling GW, Koopman JP, Midtvedt T. (1988). Reconstitution of the gastrointestinal microflora of lactobacillus-free mice. Appl Environ Microbiol 54: 2971-2975. (Pubitemid 19002388)
23. Tannock GW, Ghazally S, Walter J, Loach D, Brooks H, Cook G et al. (2005). Ecological behavior of Lactobacillus reuteri 100-23 is affected by mutation of the luxS gene. Appl Environ Microbiol 71: 8419-8425. (Pubitemid 41803971)
24. Tannock GW. (2004). A special fondness for lactobacilli. Appl Environ Microbiol 70: 3189-3194. (Pubitemid 38745859)
25. Tannock GW. (2009). Research for the 21st century: Can we draw a blueprint of the bowel ecosystem? Bioscience Microflora 28: 75-80.
26. Tatusov RL, Fedorova ND, Jackson JD, Jacobs AR, Kiryutin B, Koonin EVet al. (2003). The COG database: An updated version includes eukaryotes. BMC Bioinform 4: 41.
27. Walter J, Chagnaud P, Tannock GW, Loach D, Bello FD, Jenkinson HF et al. (2005). A high-molecular mass surface protein (Lsp) and methionine sulfoxide reductase B (MsrB) contribute to the ecological performance of Lactobacillus reuteri in the murine gut. Appl Environ Microbiol 71: 979-986. (Pubitemid 40223586)