Molecular characterization of mulberry (Morus spp.) genotypes via RAPD and ISSR

Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Volumn 92, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 1633-1637

  Ipek, Muzaffer ^a   Pirlak, Lütfi ^a   Kafkas, Salih ^b  

^a SELCUK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b CUKUROVA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Genetic similarity; ISSR; Mulberry; RAPD

Indexed keywords

PLANT DNA; PRIMER DNA;

AGRICULTURE; AMPLIFIED FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM; ARTICLE; CLIMATE; DNA FINGERPRINTING; ENVIRONMENT; FRUIT; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; METHODOLOGY; MORUS; NUCLEOTIDE REPEAT; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; POPULATION GENETICS; TURKEY (REPUBLIC);

AGRICULTURE; AMPLIFIED FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM ANALYSIS; CLIMATE; DNA FINGERPRINTING; DNA PRIMERS; DNA, PLANT; ENVIRONMENT; FRUIT; GENETIC MARKERS; GENETICS, POPULATION; GENOTYPE; MORUS; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC; REPETITIVE SEQUENCES, NUCLEIC ACID; TURKEY;

MORUS (ANGIOSPERM);

EID: 84859908387     PISSN: 00225142     EISSN: 10970010     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.4749     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Yaltirik F, Morus, in Flora of Turkey and East Aegean Island, Vol. 7, ed. by Davis PH. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp. 641-642 (1982).
2. Anonymous, Crop Production Statistics of Turkey. Turkish Statistical Institute (2009). [Online]. Available: [14 November 2011].
3. Chitra DS and Padjama G, Seasonal influence on axillary bud sprouting and micropropagation of elite cultivars of mulberry. Sci Hortic 92: 55-68 (2002).
4. Koyama A, Machii H and Yamanouchi H, Screening of mulberry genotypes suitable for fruit production and development of high-yielding strains with large fruits. Jpn Agric Res Q 35: 59-66 (2001).
5. Bhattachary E and Ranade SA, Molecular distinction amongst varieties of mulberry using RAPD and DAMD profile. Plant Biol 1: 3 (2001).
6. Bernatzky R and Tanksley SD, Restriction fragments as molecular markers for germplasm evaluation and utilization, in The Use of Plant Genetic Resources, ed. by Brown AHD, Frankel OH, Marshall DR and Williams JT. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 353-362 (1989).
7. Gepts P, The use of molecular and biochemical markers in crop evolution studies. Evol Biol 27: 51-94 (1993).
8. Ozrenk K, Gazioglu Sensoy RI, Erdinc C, Guleryuz M and Aykanat A, Molecular characterization of mulberry germplasm from Eastern Anatolia. Afr J Biotechnol 9: 1-6 (2010).
9. Yildirim A and Kandemir N, Genetic markers and analysis methods, in Plant Biotechnology: Genetic Engineering Applications, Selcuk University Foundation, p. 334-363, ISBN 975-6652-05-5 (2001).
10. Vijayan K, Genetic relationships of Japanese and Indian mulberry (Morus spp.) genotypes revealed by DNA fingerprinting, Plant Syst Evol 243: 221-232 (2003).
11. Vijayan K, Awasthi AK, Srivastava PP and Saratchandra B, Genetic analysis of Indian mulberry varieties through molecular markers. Hereditas 141: 8-14 (2004).
12. Kar PS, Srivastava PP, Awasthi AK and Raje Urs S, Genetic variability and association of ISSR markers with some biochemical traits in mulberry (Morus spp.) genetic resources available India. Tree Genet Genomes 4: 75-83 (2008).
13. Vijayan K and Chatterjee SN, ISSR profiling of Indian cultivars of mulberry (Morus spp.) and its relevance to breeding programs. Euphytica 131: 53-63 (2003).
14. Vijayan K, Srivastava PP and Awasthi AK, Analysis of phylogenetic relationship among five mulberry (Morus) species using molecular markers. Genome 47: 439-448 (2004).
15. Vijayan K, Tikader A, Kar PK, Srivastava PP, Awasthi AK, Thangavelu K, et al, Molecular evaluation of genetic variability in wild populations of mulberry (Morus serrata Roxb.). Plant Breeding 123: 568-572 (2004).
16. Vijayan K, Tikader A, Kar PK, Srivastava PP, Awasthi AK, Thangavelu K, et al, Assessment of genetic relationships between wild and cultivated mulberry (Morus) species using PCR based markers. Genet Res Crop Evol 53: 873-882 (2006).
17. Zhao W, Zhou ZH, Miao XX, Wang Lin Zhang SB, Pan YL and Huang YP, Genetic relatedness among cultivated and wild mulberry (Moraceae: Morus) as revealed by inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) analysis in China, Can J Plant Sci 86: 251-257 (2006).
18. Zhao W, Zhihua Z, Xuexia Z, Yong M, Sibao Z, Jianhua W, et al, A comparison of genetic variation among wild and cultivated Morus species (Moraceae: Morus) as revealed by ISSR and SSR markers. Biodivers Conserv 16: 275-290 (2007).
19. Zhao W, Wang Y, Chen T, Jia G, Wang X, Qi J, et al, Genetic structure of mulberry from different ecotypes revealed by ISSRs in China: implications for conservation of local mulberry varieties. Sci Hortic 115: 47-55 (2007).
20. Vijayan K, Nair CV and Chatterjee SN, Molecular characterization of mulberry genetic resources indigenous to India. Genet Resour Crop Evol 52: 77-86 (2005).
21. Kafkas S, Özkan H, Ak BE, Açar I, Atli HS and Koyuncu S, Detecting DNA polymorphism and genetic diversity in a wide pistachio germplasm: comparison of AFLP, ISSR and RAPD markers. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 131: 522-529 (2006).
22. Williams JGK, Kublik AR, Livak KJ, Rafalski JA and Tingey SV, DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucl Acids Res 18: 6531-6535 (1990).
23. Zietkiewicz E, Rafalski A and Labuda D, Genome fingerprinting by simple sequence repeat (SSR)-anchored polymerase chain reaction amplification. Genome 20: 176-183 (1994).
24. Jaccard P, Etude de la distribution florale dans une portion des Alpes et du jura. Bull Soc Vandoise Sci Nat 37: 547-579 (1901).
25. Smith JSC, Chin ECL, Shu H, Smith OS, Wall SJ, Senior ML, et al, An evaluation of the utility of SSR loci as molecular marker in maize (Zea mays): comparisons with data from RFLP and pedigree. Theor Appl Genet 95: 163-173 (1997).
26. Prevost A and Wilkinson MJ, A new system of comparing PCR primers applied to ISSR fingerprinting of potato accessions. Theor Appl Genet 98: 107-112 (1999).
27. Rohlf JF, NTSYS-pc:2. 11 Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System. Exeter Software, Setauket, NY (2004).
28. Mantel N, The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 2: 175-178 (1967).
29. Awasthi AK, Nagaraja GM, Naik GV, Kanginakudru S, Thangavelu K and Nagaraju J, Genetic diversity and relationships in mulberry (genus Morus) as revealed by RAPD and ISSR marker assays. BMC Genet 5: 1 (2004).
30. Chatterjee SN, Nagaraja GM, Srivastava PP and Naik G, Morphological and molecular variation of Morus laevigata in India. Genetica 121: 133-143 (2004).
31. Bhattacharya E, Dandin SB and Ranade SA, Single primer amplification reaction methods reveal exotic and indigenous mulberry varieties are similarly diverse. J Biosci 30: 669-677 (2005).