Deep syntactic processing by combining shallow methods

Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn 2003-July, Issue , 2003, Pages

  Dienes, Péter ^a   Dubey, Amit ^a  

^a SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; PHASE STRUCTURE;

GRAMMAR FORMALISMS; SIMPLE++; STRUCTURE INFORMATION;

SYNTACTICS;

EID: 85149132341     PISSN: 0736587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Adam L. Berger, Stephen A. Della Pietra, and Vincent J. Della Pietra. 1996. A maximum entropy approach to natural language processing. Computational Linguistics, 22(1):39-71.
2. Ann Bies, Mark Ferguson, Karen Katz, and Robert Mac-Intyre, 1995. Bracketting Guidelines for Treebank II style Penn Treebank Project. Linguistic Data Consortium.
3. Rens Bod. 2003. An efficient implementation of a new dop model. In Proceedings of the 11th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Budapest.
4. Eugene Charniak. 1993. Statistical Language Learning. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
5. Eugene Charniak. 2000. A maximum-entropy-inspired parser. In Proceedings of the 1st Conference of North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Seattle, WA.
6. Stephen Clark, Julia Hockenmaier, and Mark Steedman. 2002. Building deep dependency structures with a wide-coverage CCG parser. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Philadelphia.
7. Michael Collins, Jan Hajič, Lance Ramshaw, and Christoph Tillmann. 1999. A statistical parser for Czech. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, University of Maryland, College Park.
8. Michael Collins. 1997. Three generative, lexicalised models for statistical parsing. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 8th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Madrid.
9. James R. Curran and Stephen Clark. 2003. Investigating GIS and smoothing for maximum entropy taggers. In Proceedings of the 11th Annual Meeting of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Budapest, Hungary.
10. Péter Dienes and Amit Dubey. 2003. Antecedent recovery: Experiments with a trace tagger. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Sapporo, Japan.
11. Gerald Gazdar, Ewan Klein, Geoffrey Pullum, and Ivan Sag. 1985. Generalized Phase Structure Grammar. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, England.
12. Joshua Goodman. 1998. Parsing inside-out. Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University.
13. Mark Johnson. 2001. Joint and conditional estimation of tagging and parsing models. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 10th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Toulouse.
14. Mark Johnson. 2002. A simple pattern-matching algorithm for recovering empty nodes and their antecedents. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Philadelphia.
15. Aravind K. Joshi and Srinivas Bangalore. 1994. Complexity of descriptives-supertag disambiguation or almost parsing. In Proceedings of the 1994 International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-94), Kyoto, Japan.
16. Mitchell P. Marcus, Beatrice Santorini, and Mary Ann Marcinkiewicz. 1993. Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19(2):313-330.
17. Adwait Ratnaparkhi. 1996. A Maximum Entropy Part-of-Speech tagger. In Proceedings of the Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing Conference. University of Pennsylvania.
18. Stefan Riezler, Tracy H. King, Ronald M. Kaplan, Richard Crouch, John T. Maxwell, and Mark Johnson. 2002. Parsing the Wall Street Journal using a Lexical-Functional Grammar and discriminative estimation techniques. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Philadelphia.