Enzymatic hydrolysis of potato pulp

Acta Scientiarum Polonorum, Technologia Alimentaria

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 53-59

  Lesiecki, Mariusz ^a   Białas, Wojciech ^a   Lewandowicz, Grazyna ^a  

^a POZNA UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Poland)

Author keywords

Cellulose; Enzymatic hydrolysis; Pectin; Potato pulp; Starch

Indexed keywords

AMYLOLYTIC ENZYMES; CELLULASE ACTIVITY; CELLULOSE FRACTION; COMPLICATED SYSTEMS; ENZYMATIC PREPARATION; ETHANOL FERMENTATION; HPLC METHOD; PECTIN; PECTINASES; PECTINOLYTIC ENZYME; POTATO PULP; SECOND GENERATION;

CELLULOSE; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; GLUCOSE; STARCH;

ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS;

SOLANUM TUBEROSUM;

ALCOHOL; AMYLASE; ARABINOSE; BIOFUEL; CELLULASE; CELLULOSE; GLUCAN 1,4 ALPHA GLUCOSIDASE; GLUCOSE; POLYGALACTURONASE; STARCH;

ARTICLE; HYDROLYSIS; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; METABOLISM; PLANT TUBER; POTATO;

ALPHA-AMYLASES; ARABINOSE; BIOFUELS; CELLULASE; CELLULOSE; ETHANOL; GLUCAN 1,4-ALPHA-GLUCOSIDASE; GLUCOSE; HYDROLYSIS; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; PLANT TUBERS; POLYGALACTURONASE; SOLANUM TUBEROSUM; STARCH;

EID: 84859899444     PISSN: 16440730     EISSN: 18989594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Carpita N.C., Gibeaut D.M., 1993. Structural models of primary cell walls in fl owering plants-consistency of molecular structure with the physical properties of the walls during growth. Plant J. 3, 1-30.
2. Gumul D., Ziobro R., Noga M., Sabat R., 2011. Characterisation of fi ve potato cultivars according to their nutritional and pro-health components. Acta Sci. Pol., Technol. Aliment. 10 (1), 73-81.
3. Kuhls K., Lieckfeldt E., 1996. Molecular evidence that the asexual industrial fungus Trichoderma reesei is a clonal derivative of the ascomycete Hypocrea jecorina. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 93, 7755-7760.
4. Kumar R., Singh S., Singh O.V., 2008. Bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass: biochemical and molecular perspectives. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 35, 377-391.
5. Malherbe S., Cloete T.E., 2002. Lignocellulose biodegradation: Fundamentals and applications. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 1, 105-114.
6. Micard V., Renard C.M., Thibault J.F., 1996. Enzymatic saccharifi cation of sugar beet pulp. Enzyme Microb. Tech. 19, 162-170.
7. Mosier N., Wyman C., Dale B., Elander R., Lee Y.Y., Holtzapple M., 2005. Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 96 (6), 673-686.
8. Sadeghi A., Shahidi F., Seyed A. Mortazavi, Mahdi N. Mahalati, 2008. Evaluation of different parameters effect on maltodextrin production by α-amylase Termamyl 120L. World Appl. Sci. J. 3 (1), 34-39.
9. Spagnuolo M., Crecchio C., Pizzigallo M.D.R., Ruggiero P., 1997. Synergistic effects of cellulolytic and pectinolytic enzymes in degrading sugar beet pulp. Bioresour. Technol. 60, 215-222.
10. Sun Y., Cheng J., 2002. Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review. Bioresour. Technol. 83, 1-11.
11. Sun R., Hughes S., 1998, Fractional extraction and physico-chemical characterization of hemicellulo ses and cellulose from sugar beet pulp, Carbohydr. Polym. 36, 293-299