Competing values, tensions and trade-offs in management of nuclear power plants

Work

Volumn 41, Issue SUPPL.1, 2012, Pages 722-729

  Reiman, Teemu ^a   Rollenhagen, Carl ^b  

^a VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND   (Finland)

^b ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

competing values; nuclear safety; safety management; trade offs

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONFLICT; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MENTAL STRESS; NUCLEAR POWER PLANT; ORGANIZATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; SAFETY;

CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS; ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE; SAFETY MANAGEMENT; STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL;

EID: 84859867314     PISSN: 10519815     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-2012-0232-722     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. K.S. Cameron and R.E. Quinn, Diagnosing and changing organizational culture. Based on the Competing Values Framework, Third Edition, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 2011.
2. K.S. Cameron, R.E. Quinn, J. Degraff and A.V. Thakor, Competing values leadership. Creating value in organizations, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2006.
3. M. Farjoun, Beyond dualism: Stability and change as a duality, Academy of Management Review 35 (2010), 202-225.
4. E. Hollnagel, The ETTO principle: efficiency-thoroughness trade-off, Ashgate, Farnhamn, 2009.
5. J. Kettunen, T. Reiman and B. Wahlström, Safety management challenges and tensions in the European nuclear power industry. Scandinavian Journal of Management 23 (2007), 424-444.
6. P. Oedewald and T. Reiman, Core task modelling in cultural assessment: A case study in nuclear power plant maintenance. Cognition, Technology & Work 5 (2003), 283-293.
7. T. Reiman and C. Rollenhagen, Human and organizational biases affecting the management of safety. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 96 (2011), 1263-1274.
8. T. Reiman, U. Kahlbom, E. Pietikäinen and C. Rollenhagen, Nuclear Safety Culture in Finland and Sweden - Developments and Challenges. NKS-239. Nordic nuclear safety research NKS, Roskilde, Denmark, 2001.
9. R.E. Quinn, Beyond rational management: Mastering the paradoxes and competing demands of high performance. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1988.
10. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). 'Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theory and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries'. In M. Zanna (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 25). New York: Academic Press: 1-65.
11. D. D. Woods and M. Branlat, How human adaptive systems balance fundamental trade-offs: Implications for polycentric governance architectures, in Proceedings of the Fourth Resilience Engineering Symposium, June 8-10, 2011, Sophia Antipolis, France.
12. K. Zimmermann, J. Paries, R. Amalberti and D.H. Hummerdal, Is the aviation industry ready for resilience? Mapping human factors assumptions across the aviation sector, in: Resilience engineering in practice. A guidebook. E. Hollnagel, J. Paries, D.D. Woods and J. Wreathall, eds, Ashgate, Farnham, 2011.