Contextual frames and their argumentative implications: A case study in media argumentation

Discourse Studies

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 197-216

  Morasso, Sara Greco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Argument schemes; Argumentum Model of Topics; contextual frames; lexical choices; loci; news and comment; news in the press; pragma dialectics; presentational devices; strategic manoeuvring; topical potential

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859853880     PISSN: 14614456     EISSN: 14617080     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1461445611433636     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Burger M,Martel GArgumentation et communication dans les médias. Québec: Nota Bene; 2005:.
2. La retorica a Gaio Erennio. Cancelli F, ed. Milano: Mondadori; 1992:.
3. Fillmore CJ.Frame semantics and the nature of language. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: Conference on the Origin and Development of Language and Speech., 1976. 280: 20-32
4. Fillmore CJ,Atkins BTFrames, Fields and Contrasts. Lehrer AKittay EF, ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1992:75-102.
5. Fitzgerald R,Jaworski A,Housely WL'analyse linguistique des discours médiatiques. Burger M, ed. Québec: Nota Bene; 2008:133-154.
6. Flyvbjerg BMaking Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001:.
7. Gatti MCTipologia dei testi e tecniche espressive. Gobber GMilani C, ed. Milano: Vita e Pensiero; 2002:153-166.
8. Goffman EFrame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper & Row; 1974:.
9. Greco MorassoS (2009) Argumentative and other communicative strategies of the mediation practice. PhD dissertation, Università della Svizzera italiana.
10. Keeble RThe Newspapers Handbook. 2006) The Newspapers Handbook, 4th edn.New York: Taylor & Francis.New York: Taylor & Francis; 2006:.
11. KoenigT (2005) Frame analysis. Paper available at the Cathie Marsh Centre for Census and Survey Research. Available at: http://www.ccsr.ac.uk/methods/publications/frameanalysis/index.html (accessed 27 May 2011).
12. Pounds G.Attitude and subjectivity in Italian and British hard-news reporting: The construction of a culture-specific 'reporter' voice.Discourse Studies. 2010;12 (1): 106-137.
13. Reuters (2008) Reuters Handbook of Journalism. Available at: http://handbook.reuters.com/index.php/Main_Page (accessed 28 February 2011).
14. Richardson JEAnalysing Newspapers: An Approach from Critical Discourse Analysis. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmilan; 2007:.
15. Rigotti EPondering on Problems of Argumentation. van Eemeren FHGarssen B, ed. New York: Springer; 2009:157-178.
16. RigottiEGrecoS (2005) La liberazione di Giuliana Sgrena: Analisi di un rilevante caso di cronaca politica. In: RigottiE. Argomentazione nei media, Argumentum eLearning module. Available at: www.argumentum.ch (accessed 5 October 2011, restricted access).
17. Rigotti E,Greco Morasso S.Comparing the Argumentum Model of Topics to other contemporary approaches to argument schemes: The procedural and material components.Argumentation. 2010;24 (4): 489-512.
18. Rigotti E,Rocci ACommunication Sciences as a Multidisciplinary Enterprise, special issue of Studies in Communication Sciences. Colombetti M, ed. 2006:155-180.
19. Rocci AExamining Argumentation in Context: Fifteen Studies on Strategic Maneuvering. van Eemeren FH, ed. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 2009:257-283.
20. Shmueli DF,Ben-Gal M.Stakeholder frames in the mapping of the Lower Kishon River Basin conflict.Conflict Resolution Quarterly. 2003;21 (2): 211-238.
21. Smith CSModes of Discourse. The Local Structure of Texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003:.
22. Van Dijk TADiscourse and Communication: New Approaches to the Analysis of Mass Media, Discourse and Communication. van Dijk TA, ed. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter; 1985:.
23. Van Dijk TA.Knowledge and news.Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses. 2004;49:71-86.
24. Van Dijk TADiscourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008:.
25. Van Dijk TASociety and Discourse: How Context Controls Text and Talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009:.
26. Van Eemeren FHStrategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the Pragma-dialectical Theory of Argumentation. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins; 2010:.
27. Van Eemeren FH,Houtlosser PDialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis. Van Eemeren FHHoutlosser P, ed. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 2002:131-159.
28. Van Eemeren FH,Houtlosser PPondering on Problems of Argumentation: Twenty Essays on Theoretical Issues. Van Eemeren FHHoutlosser P, ed. New York: Springer; 2009:3-14.
29. Van Eemeren FH,Grootendorst R,Blair JA,Willard CHArgumentation: Analysis, Evaluation, Presentation. Mahwah, NJ and London: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2002:.
30. Walton DOne-sided Arguments:A Dialectical Analysis of Bias. New York: SUNY Press; 1999:.
31. Walton DMedia Argumentation: Dialectic, Persuasion and Rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007:.
32. Zarefsky D.Strategic maneuvering through persuasive definitions: Implications for dialectic and rhetoric.Argumentation. 2006;20 (4): 399-416.