Whether and How Classical Topics can be Revived Within Contemporary Argumentation Theory

Argumentation Library

Volumn 14, Issue , 2009, Pages 157-178

  Rigotti, Eddo ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Argumentation Scheme; Classical Topic; Conceptual System; Major Premise; Young Couple

Indexed keywords

EID: 85094911564     PISSN: 15667650     EISSN: 22151907     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9165-0_12     Document Type: Chapter

References (38)

1. Bigi, S. (2007). Keywords in argumentative texts and their persuasive power. In F. H. van Eemeren, J. A. Blair, C. A. Willard, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
2. Bochenski, M. (Ed.). (1947). Petri Hispani Summulae Logicales. Torino: Marietti.
3. Braet, A. (2005). The common topic in Aristotle’s Rhetoric: Precursor of the argumentation scheme. Argumentation, 19, 65–83.
4. Buridan, J. (2001). Summulae de Dialectica. (G. Klima, Trans.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
5. Cigada, S. (2007). Past-oriented and future-oriented emotions in argumentation for Europe during the fifties. In F. H. van Eemeren, J. A. Blair, C. A. Willard, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 241–245). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
6. Cancelli, F. (Ed.). (1992). Cicerone: La retorica a Gaio Erennio. Milano: Arnoldo Mondadori Editore.
7. De Rijk, L. M. (Ed.). (1970). Petrus Abaelardus, Dialectica: First complete edition of the Parisian manuscript with an introduction. Assen: Van Gorcum.
8. Garssen, B. (2001). Argument schemes. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Crucial Concepts in Argumentation Theory (pp. 81–99). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
9. Greco Morasso, S. (2007). The covert argumentativity of mediation: Developing argumentation through asking questions. In F. H. van Eemeren, J. A. Blair, C. A. Willard, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 513–520). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
10. Grennan, W. (1997). Informal Logic. Montreal: McGill University Press.
11. Hastings, A. C. (1963). A reformulation of the modes of reasoning in argumentation. Ph.D. Dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
12. Hjelmslev, L. (1953). Prolegomena to a Theory of Language. Baltimore: Waverly Press.
13. Hubbel, H. M. (Ed.). (1949). Cicero: On Inventio – On the Best kind of Orator – Topics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14. Katzav, J., & Reed, C. (2004). On argumentation schemes and the natural classification of arguments. Argumentation, 18(2), 239–259.
15. Kienpointner, M. (1992). Alltagslogik: Struktur und Funktion von Argumentationsmustern. Stuttgart: Fromman-Holzboog.
16. Minio-Paluello, L. (Ed.). (1949). Aristotelis Categoriae et Liber de Interpretatione. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1958). Traité de l’Argumentation: La Nouvelle Rhétorique. Paris: P.U.F.
18. Reinhardt, T. (Ed.). (2003). Marcus Tullius Cicero, Topica. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Rigotti, E. (1993). La sequenza testuale. Definizione e procedimenti di analisi con esemplificazi-one in lingue diverse. L’analisi Linguistica e Letteraria, 1(2), 43–148.
20. Rigotti, E. (2005). Congruity theory and argumentation. Studies in Communication Sciences, Special Issue Argumentation in Dialogic Interaction, 75–96.
21. Rigotti, E. (2006). Relevance of context-bound loci to topical potential in the argumentation stage. Argumentation, 20, 519–540.
22. Rigotti, E., & Greco, S. (2006). Topics: The argument generator. Argumentum e-learning Module. www.argumentum.ch.
23. Rigotti, E., Rocci, A., & Greco, S. (2006). The semantics of reasonableness. In P. Houtlosser & A. van Rees (Eds.), Considering Pragma-dialectics (pp. 257–274). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24. Rocci, A. (2005a). Connective predicates in monologic and dialogic argumentation. Studies in Communication Sciences, Special Issue Argumentation in Dialogic Interaction, 97–118.
25. Rocci, A. (2005b). La modalità epistemica tra semantica e argomentazione. Milano: Pubblicazioni dell’ISU Università Cattolica.
26. Ross, W. D. (Ed.). (1950). Aristotelis Physica. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27. Ross, W. D. (Ed.). (1958). Aristotelis Topica et Sophistici Elenchi. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28. Ross, W. D. (Ed.). (1959). Aristotelis Ars Rhetorica. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Stump, E. (Ed.). (2004). Boethius’s “De Topicis Differentiis”. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
30. Tardini, S. (2007). Argumentum: An e-Course for learning argumentation by arguing. In F. H. van Eemeren, J. A. Blair, C. A. Willard, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 1353–1358). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
31. Toulmin, S., Riecke, R., & Janik, A. (1984). An introduction to reasoning. New York: Macmillan.
32. van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2002). Strategic maneuvering: maintaining a delicate balance. In F. H. van Eemeren & P. Houtlosser (Eds.), Dialectic and Rhetoric. The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
33. van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2005). Theoretical construction and argumentative reality: An analytic model of critical discussion and conventionalised types of argumentative activity. In D. Hitchcock & D. Farr (Eds.), The uses of Argument. Proceedings of a Conference at McMaster University, 18–21 May 2005 (pp. 75–84). Hamilton: Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation.
34. Walton, D. (1996). Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.
35. Walton, D. (2005a). Begging the question in arguments based on testimony. Argumentation, 19, 85–113.
36. Walton, D. (2005b). How to evaluate argumentation using schemes, diagrams, critical questions and dialogues. Studies in Communication Sciences, Special Issue Argumentation in Dialogic Interaction, 51–74.
37. Winterbottom, M. (Ed.). (1970). M. Fabi Quintiliani Institutionis Oratoriae Libri XII. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38. Wüest, J. (2001). La gerarchia degli atti linguistici nel testo. Studies in Communication Sciences, 1(1), 195–211.