Phenomenology of bodily integrity in disfiguring breast cancer

Hypatia

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 281-300

  Slatman, Jenny ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859848891     PISSN: 08875367     EISSN: 15272001     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01261.x     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Andrade, W. N., N. Baxter, and, J. L. Semple,. 2001. Clinical determinants of patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 107 (1): 46-54.
2. Arora, N. K., D. H. Gustafson, R. P. Hawkins, F. McTavish, D. F. Cella, S. Pingree, J. H. Mendenhall, and, D. M. Mahvi,. 2001. Impact of surgery and chemotherapy on the quality of life of younger women with breast carcinoma. Cancer 92 (5): 1288-98.
3. Ashley, B. M,. 1985. Theologies of the body: Humanist and Christian. Braintree, Mass.: The Pope John Center.
4. Bayne, T., and, N. Levy,. 2005. Amputees by choice: Body integrity identity disorder and the ethics of amputation. Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (1): 75-86.
5. Bazell, R,. 1998. Her-2: The making of Herceptin, A revolutionary treatment for breast cancer. New York: Random House.
6. Beauchamp, T. L., 2007. The "four principles" approach to health care ethics. In Principles of health care ethics, ed., R. E. Ashcroft, A. Dawson, H. Draper, and, J. R. McMillan,. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
7. Beauchamp, T. L., and, J. F. Childress,. 1994. Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Beauvoir, S. de,. 1948. The ethics of ambiguity. New York: Citadel Press.
9. Bergoffen, D,. 2009. Exploiting the dignity of the vulnerable body: Rape as a weapon of war. Philosophical Papers 38 (3): 307-25.
10. Campbell, C. S,. 1998. Religion and the body in medical research. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 8 (3): 275-305.
11. Charles, C. A., A. Gafni, and, T. Whelan,. 1999. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: Revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Social Science & Medicine 49 (5): 651-61.
12. Charles, C. A., T. Whelan, A. Gafni, A. Willan, and, S. Farrell,. 2003. Shared treatment decision making: What does it mean to physicians? Journal of Clinical Oncology 21 (5): 932.
13. Coetzee, J. M,. 2005. Slow man. London: Secker & Warburg.
14. Cohen, M. Z., D. L. Kahn, and, R. H. Steeves,. 1998. Beyond body image: The experience of breast cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum 25 (5): 835-41.
15. Collins, E. D., C. P. Moore, K. F. Clay, S. A. Kearing, A. M. O'Connor, H. A. Llewellyn-Thomas, R. J. Barth, and, K. R. Sepucha,. 2009. Can women with early-stage breast cancer make an informed decision for mastectomy? Journal of Clinical Oncology 27 (4): 519-25.
16. Dekkers, W., C. Hoffer, and, J. P. Wils,. 2005. Bodily integrity and male and female circumcision. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 8: 179-91.
17. Dekkers, W., C. Hoffer, and, J. P. Wils,. 2006. Besnijdenis, lichamelijke integriteit en multiculturalisme: Een empirische en normatief-ethische studie [Circumcision, bodily integrity and multiculturalism. An empirical and normative-ethical study]. Budel, Netherlands: Damon.
18. Diprose, R,. 1994. The bodies of women: Ethics, embodiment and sexual difference. London and New York: Routledge.
19. Duncker, P., and, V. Wilson, eds. 1996. Cancer through the eyes of ten women. London: HarperCollins.
20. Figueiredo, M. I., J. Cullen, Y. T. Hwang, J. H. Rowland, and, J. S. Mandelblatt,. 2004. Breast cancer treatment in older women: Does getting what you want improve your long-term body image and mental health? Journal of Clinical Oncology 22 (19): 4002-09.
21. Fuss, D,. 1989. Essentially speaking: Feminism, nature and difference. New York: Routledge.
22. Gilbert, M,. 2003. Whole. A Documentary. St. Paul, Minn: Frozen Feet Films.
23. Grosz, E,. 1994. Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
24. Hacking, I,. 2007. Our neo-Cartesian bodies in parts. Critical Inquiry 34 (1): 78-105.
25. Harcourt, D. M., N. J. Rumsey, N. R. Ambler, S. J. Cawthorn, C. D. Reid, P. R. Maddox, J. M. Kenealy, R. M. Rainsbury, and, H. C. Umpleby,. 2003. The psychological effect of mastectomy with or without breast reconstruction: A prospective, multicenter study. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 111 (3): 106-15.
26. Hilhorst, M,. 2002. Physical beauty: Only skin deep? Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (1): 11-21.
27. Husserl, E., 1931/1970. Cartesian meditations. Trans. D. Cairns. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
28. Husserl, E.,. 1952/1989. Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy, Second book. Trans. R. Rojcewicz and A. Schuwer. Dordrecht, Boston, and London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
29. Kendrick, K,. 2008. "Normalizing" female cancer patients: Look good, feel better and other image programs. Disability & Society 23 (3): 259-69.
30. Kopelman, L. M., 2006. Clinical trials for breast cancer and informed consent: How women helped make research a cooperative venture. In The voice of breast cancer in medicine and bioethics, ed., M. C. Rawlinson, and, S. Lundeen,. Dordrecht: Springer.
31. Lansdown, R., N. Rumsey, E. Bradbury, and, T. Carr,. 1997. Visibly different. Coping with disfigurement. London: Butterworth-Heineman.
32. Leder, D., 1999. Whose body? What body? The metaphysics of organ donation. In Persons and their bodies: Rights, responsibilities, relationships, ed., M. J. Cherry,. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
33. Lerner, B., 2006. Power, gender, and pizzazz: The early years of breast cancer activism. In The voice of breast cancer in medicine and bioethics, ed., M. C. Rawlinson, and, S. Lundeen,. Dordrecht: Springer.
34. Lorde, A,. 1980. The cancer journals. New York: Spinsters Ink.
35. Mackenzie, C., and, J. L. Scully,. 2007. Moral imagination, disability and embodiment. Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (4): 335-51.
36. Merleau-Ponty, M., 1945/1962. Phenomenology of perception. Trans. C. Smith. London/New York: Routledge.
37. Moser, I,. 2009. A body that matters? The role of embodiment in the recomposition of life after a road traffic accident. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 11 (2): 83-99.
38. Nancy, J.-L,. 1993. Le sens du monde. Paris: Galilée.
39. Nancy, J.-L,. 2000. L'intrus. Trans. S. Hanson. The New Centennial Review 2 (3): 1-13.
40. Oliver, M,. 1996. Understanding disability: From theory to practice. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.
41. Perpich, D,. 2005. Corpus Meum: Disintegrating bodies and the ideal of integrity. Hypatia 20 (3): 75-91.
42. Pruzinsky, T., and, T. F. Cash, 2002a. Understanding body images. Historical and contemporary perspectives. In Body image: A handbook of theory, research, and clinical practice, ed., T. F. Cash, and, T. Pruzinsky,. New York: The Guilford Press.
43. Rendtorff, J. D,. 2002. Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw: Autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability-Towards a foundation of bioethics and biolaw. Medicine, health care and philosophy 5 (3): 235-44.
44. Rendtorff, J. D., and, P. Kemp,. 2000. Basic ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw. Vol. I. Autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability. Copenhagen: Centre for Ethics and Law.
45. Ricoeur, P., 1991. Life in quest of narrative. In On Paul Ricoeur: Narrative and interpretation, ed., D. Wood,. London: Routledge.
46. Scully, J. L., 2008. Disability bioethics: Moral bodies, moral difference. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
47. Shakespeare, T,. 2006. Disability rights and wrongs. London: Routledge.
48. Sheehan, J., K. A. Sherman, T. Lam, and, J. Boyages,. 2008. Regret associated with the decision for breast reconstruction: The association of negative body image, distress and surgery characteristics with decision regret. Psychology and Health 23 (2): 207-19.
49. Sherwin, S., 2006. Personalizing the political: Negotiating the feminist, medical, scientific and commercial discourses surrounding breast cancer. In The voice of breast cancer in medicine and bioethics, ed., M. C. Rawlinson, and, S. Lundeen,. Dordrecht: Springer.
50. Shildrick, M,. 1999. This body which is not one: Dealing with differences. Body & Society 5 (2-3): 77-92.
51. Slatman, J,. 2005. The sense of life: Husserl and Merleau-Ponty on touching and being touched. Chiasmi International 7: 305-25.
52. Slatman, J.,. 2007. Recognition beyond narcissism. Imaging the body's ownness and strangeness. In The Other: Feminist reflections in ethics, ed., H. Fielding, G. Hiltmann, D. Olkowski, and, A. Reichold,. London: Palgrave.
53. Slatman, J,. 2008. Vreemd Lichaam. Over medisch ingrijpen en persoonlijke identiteit [Strange body. On medical interventions and personal identity]. Amsterdam: Ambo.
54. Slatman, J,. 2009a. A strange hand: On self-recognition and recognition of another. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8 (3): 321-42.
55. Slatman, J., 2009b. Transparent bodies: Revealing the myth of interiority. In The body within: Art, medicine and visualization, ed., R. Van de Vall, and, R. Zwijnenberg,. Leiden: Brill.
56. Slatman, J,. 2011. The meaning of body experience evaluation in oncology. Health Care Analysis. 19 (4): 295-311.
57. Slatman, J., and, G. Widdershoven,. 2009. Being whole after amputation. American Journal of Bioethics 9 (1): 48-49.
58. Slatman, J., and, G. Widdershoven,. 2010. Hand transplants and bodily integrity. Body & Society 16 (3): 69-92.
59. Sorene, E. D., C. Heras-Palou, and, F. D. Burke,. 2006. Self-amputation of a healthy hand: A case of body integrity identity disorder. Journal of Hand Surgery 31 (6): 593-95.
60. Tong, R., 2006. Negotiating personal and political settlements with breast cancer. In The voice of breast cancer in medicine and bioethics, ed., M. C. Rawlinson, and, S. Lundeen,. Dordrecht: Springer.
61. Toombs, S. K., 1999. What does it mean to be somebody? Phenomenological reflections and ethical quandries. In Persons and their bodies: Rights, responsibilities, relationships, ed., M. J. Cherry,. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
62. Waldenfels, B,. 2004. Bodily experience between selfhood and otherness. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3 (3): 235-48.
63. Weiss, G,. 1999. Body images. Embodiment as intercorporeality. New York: Routledge.
64. Weiss, G.,. 2006. Death and the Other: Rethinking authenticity. In The voice of breast cancer in medicine and bioethics, ed., M. C. Rawlinson, and, S. Lundeen,. Dordrecht: Springer: 103-116.
65. Weiss, J. R., K. B. Moysich, and, H. Swede,. 2005. Epidemiology of male breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 14 (1): 20-26.
66. Widdershoven, G., 1993. The story of life: Hermeneutic perspectives on the relationship between narrative and lifes history. In The narrative study of lives, ed., R. Josselson, and, A. Lieblich,. London: Sage.
67. Woerdeman, L., 2005. Surgical risk factors of breast reconstruction and their clinical implication. PhD diss., University of Amsterdam.
68. Zeiler, K,. 2009. Ethics and organ transfer: A Merleau-Pontean perspective. Health Care Analysis 17 (2): 110-22.
69. Zwart, H., 2000. From circle to square: Integrity, vulnerability and digitalization. In Bioethics and biolaw. Vol. II. Four ethical principles, ed., P. Kemp, J. D. Rendtorff, and, N. M. Johansen,. Copenhagen: Centre for Ethics and Law.
70. Zwart, H.,. 2007. Integriteit. In Lexicon van de Ethiek, ed., M. Becker, B. Van Stokkom, P. Van Tongeren, and, J. P. Wils,. Assen, Netherlands: Van Gorcum.