Enrolling in deep brain stimulation research for depression: Influences on potential subjects' decision making

Depression and Anxiety

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 139-146

  Christopher, Paul P ^a   Leykin, Yan ^b   Appelbaum, Paul S ^c   Holtzheimer III, Paul E ^d   Mayberg, Helen S ^e   Dunn, Laura B ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d DARTMOUTH MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^e EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Bioethics; Decision making; Deep brain stimulation; Depression; Informed consent; Research ethics

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALTRUISM; ARTICLE; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; DEPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MOTIVATION; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; THEMATIC ANALYSIS;

ADULT; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; DECISION MAKING; DEEP BRAIN STIMULATION; DEPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; TREATMENT FAILURE;

EID: 84859843931     PISSN: 10914269     EISSN: 15206394     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/da.20916     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Fava M, Davidson KG.Definition and epidemiology of treatment-resistant depression. Psychiatr Clin North Am 1996;19:179-200.
2. Greden JF. The burden of disease for treatment-resistant depression. J Clin Psychiatry 2001;62:26-31.
3. Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Wisniewski SR, et al. Acute and longer-term outcomes in depressed outpatients requiring one or several treatment steps: a STAR*D report. Am J Psychiatry 2006;163:1905-1917. (Pubitemid 44807782)
4. Giacobbe P, Mayberg HS, Lozano AM. Treatment resistant depression as a failure of brain homeostatic mechanisms: implications for deep brain stimulation. Exp Neurol 2009;219:44-52.
5. Bell E, Mathieu G, Racine E. Preparing the ethical future of deep brain stimulation. Surg Neurol 2009;72:577-586.
6. Bewernick BH, Hurlemann R, Matusch A, et al. Nucleus accumbens deep brain stimulation decreases ratings of depression and anxiety in treatment-resistant depression. Biol Psychiatry 2010;67:110-116.
7. Lozano AM, Mayberg HS, Giacobbe P, et al. Subcallosal cingulate gyrus deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression. Biol Psychiatry 2008;64:461-467.
8. Malone DA, Dougherty DD, Rezai AR, et al. Deep brain stimulation of the ventral capsule/ventral striatum for treatment-resistant depression. Biol Psychiatry 2009;65:267-275.
9. Mayberg HS, Lozano AM, Voon V, et al. Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression. Neuron 2005;45:651-660. (Pubitemid 40320700)
10. Rabins P, Appleby BS, Brandt J, et al. Scientific and ethical issues related to deep brain stimulation for disorders of mood, behavior, and thought. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2009;66:931-937.
11. Bronstein JM, Tagliati M, Alterman RL, et al. Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson disease: an expert consensus and review of key issues. Arch Neurol 2011;68:165.
12. Dunn LB, Holtzheimer PE, Hoop JG, et al. Ethical issues in deep brain stimulation research for treatment-resistant depression: Focus on risk and consent. AJOB Neurosci 2011;2:29-36.
13. Appelbaum PS, Grisso T, Frank E, et al. Competence of depressed patients for consent to research. Am J Psychiatry 1999;156:1380-1384. (Pubitemid 29416534)
14. Lidz CW, Appelbaum PS, Grisso T, Renaud M. Therapeutic misconception and the appreciation of risks in clinical trials. Soc Sci Med 2004;58:1689-1697. (Pubitemid 38281135)
15. Lipsman N, Bernstein M, Lozano AM. Criteria for the ethical conduct of psychiatric neurosurgery clinical trials. Neurosurg Focus 2010;29:E9.
16. Wasan AD, Taubenberger SP, Robinson WM. Reasons for participation in pain research: can they indicate a lack of informed consent? Pain Med 2009;10:111-119.
17. Appelbaum PS, Lidz CW, Klitzman R. Voluntariness of consent to research: a conceptual model. Hastings Center Report 2009;39:30-39.
18. Schlaepfer TE, Cohen MX, Frick C, et al. Deep brain stimulation to reward circuitry alleviates anhedonia in refractory major depression. Neuropsychopharmacology 2008;33:368-377. (Pubitemid 350243349)
19. Howe EG. Sliding "off" the sliding scale: allowing hope, determining capacity, and providing meaning when an illness is becoming worse but a treatment may help. J Clin Ethics 2010;21:91-100.
20. Dunn LB, Candilis PJ, Roberts LW. Emerging empirical evidence on the ethics of schizophrenia research. Schizophr Bull 2006;32:47-68. (Pubitemid 43063819)
21. Roberts LW, Hammond KG, Hoop J. An inverse relationship between perceived harm and participation willingness in schizophrenia research protocols. Am J Psychiatry 2006;163:2002-2004. (Pubitemid 44807794)
22. Wright JR, Whelan TJ, Schiff S, et al. Why cancer patients enter randomized clinical trials: exploring the factors that influence their decision. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:4312-4318. (Pubitemid 41185152)
23. Agrawal M, Grady C, Fairclough DL, et al. Patients' decision-making process regarding participation in phase I oncology research. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:4479-4484. (Pubitemid 46630987)
24. Steinhauser KE, Alexander SC, Byock IR, et al. Seriously ill patients'discussions of preparation and life completion: an intervention to assist with transition at the end of life. Palliat Support Care 2009;7:393-404.
25. Appelbaum PS, Grisso T. MacCAT-CR: MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Clinical Research. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press; 2001.
26. Taylor PJ, Awenat Y, Gooding P, et al. The subjective experience of participation in schizophrenia research: a practical and ethical issue. J Nerv Ment Dis 2010;198:343-348.
27. Roberts LW, Warner TD, Anderson CT, et al. Schizophrenia research participants' responses to protocol safeguards: recruitment, consent, and debriefing. Schizophr Res 2004;67:283-291. (Pubitemid 38251460)
28. Misra S, Socherman R, Hauser P, Ganzini L. Appreciation of research information in patients with bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord 2008;10:635-646. (Pubitemid 352003830)
29. Roberts LW, Warner TD, Brody JL, et al. Patient and psychiatrist ratings of hypothetical schizophrenia research protocols: assessment of harm potential and factors influencing participation decisions. Am J Psychiatry 2002;159:573-584. (Pubitemid 34274939)
30. Rush AJ, Marangell LB, Sackeim HA, et al. Vagus nerve stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: a randomized, controlled acute phase trial. Biol Psychiatry 2005;58:347-354. (Pubitemid 41219702)
31. O'Reardon JP, Solvason HB, Janicak PG, et al. Efficacy and safety of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the acute treatment of major depression: a multisite randomized controlled trial. Biol Psychiatry 2007;62:1208-1216. (Pubitemid 350060890)
32. Shannon-Dorcy K, Drevdahl DJ. "I had already made up my mind": patients and caregivers' perspectives on making the decision to participate in research at a US cancer referral center. Cancer Nurs 2011 Jan. 15 [Epub ahead of print].
33. Nurgat ZA, Craig W, Campbell NC, et al. Patient motivations surrounding participation in phase I and phase II clinical trials of cancer chemotherapy. Br J Cancer 2005;92:1001-1005. (Pubitemid 40546660)
34. Gilbert F, Ovadia D. Deep brain stimulation in the media: overoptimistic portrayals call for a new strategy involving journalists and scientists in ethical debates. Front Integr Neurosci 2011;5:16.
35. Schlaepfer TE, Lisanby SH, Pallanti S. Separating hope from hype: some ethical implications of the development of deep brain stimulation in psychiatric research and treatment. CNS Spectr 2010;15:285-287.
36. Mishra S, Lalumière ML. You can't always get what you want: the motivational effect of need on risk-sensitive decision-making. J Exp Soc Psychol 2010;46:605-611.
37. Kim SY, Schrock L, Wilson RM, et al. An approach to evaluating the therapeutic misconception. IRB 2009;31:7-14.
38. Christopoulos GI, Tobler PN, Bossaerts P, et al. Neural correlates of value, risk, and risk aversion contributing to decision making under risk. J Neurosci 2009;29:12574-12583.
39. Furnham A, Ribchester T. Tolerance of ambiguity: a review of the concept, its measurement and applications. Curr Psychol 1995;14:179-199. (Pubitemid 126029425)
40. Svenson O, Salo I, Lindholm T. Post-decision consolidation and distortion of facts. Judgment Dec Making 2009;4:397-407.