Medical liability of the physician in training

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 470, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 1379-1385

  Wegman, Brian ^a   Stannard, James P ^a   Bal, B Sonny ^a  

^a University of Missouri   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CLINICAL SUPERVISION; CONFERENCE PAPER; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; JOB EXPERIENCE; JOB PERFORMANCE; LAW SUIT; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL ERROR; MEDICAL LIABILITY; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL STUDENT; MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT SAFETY; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE; PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT; RESIDENCY EDUCATION; RESIDENT;

EID: 84859832735     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2244-4     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Centman v Cobb, 581 NE2d 1286 (Ind Ct App 1991).
2. Felice v Valley Lab Inc, 520 So 2d 920 (La Ct App 1988).
3. Gonzalez v St John Hospital & Medical Center, 739 NW2d 392 (Mich Ct App 2007).
4. Helms LB, Helms CM. Forty years of litigation involving residents and their training: II. Malpractice issues. Acad Med. 1991;66:718-725.
5. Jenkins v Clark, 454 NE2d 541; Ohio Ct App (1982).
6. Jistarri v Nappi, 549 A2d 210 (Pa Super Ct 1988).
7. Johnson v Kokemoor, 545 NW2d 495 (Wis 1996).
8. Kachalia A, Studdert DM. Professional liability issues in graduate medical education. JAMA. 2004;292:1051-1052.
9. King JH. Causation, valuation, and chance in personal injury torts involving preexisting conditions and future consequences. Yale Law J. 1981;90:1353.
10. King JH. Reconciling the exercise of judgment and the objective standard of care in medical malpractice. Okla Law Rev. 1999; 52:49.
11. King JH. The standard of care for residents and other medical school graduates in training. Am U L Rev. 2005;55:683.
12. Lownsbury v Van Buren, 762 NE2d 354 (Ohio 2001).
13. McBride v United States, 462 F2d 72, 74 (9th Cir 1972).
14. Meisel A, Kabnick LD. Informed consent to medical treatment: an analysis of recent legislation. U Pitt Law Rev. 1980;41:438-439.
15. Mercil v Mathers; No C3-93-140, 1994 WL 1114 (Minn Ct App Jan 4, 1994), rev'd on other grounds, 517 NW2d 328 (Minn 1994).
16. National Bank of Commerce v Quirk; 918 SW2d 138 (Ark 1996).
17. Phelps v Physicians Ins Co of Wis, 681 NW2d 571, 582 (Wisc Ct App 2004), rev'd on other grounds, 698 NW2d 643.
18. Powers vUnited States, 589 FSupp1084, 1099-1101 (DConn 1984).
19. Pratt v Stein, 444 A2d 674 (Pa Super Ct 1982).
20. Reuter SR. Professional liability in postgraduate medical education. Who is liable for resident negligence? J Leg Med. 1994;15: 485-531.
21. Rodriguez RM, Anglin D, Hankin A, Hayden SR, Phelps M, McCollough L, Hendey GW. A longitudinal study of emergency medicine residents' malpractice fear and defensive medicine. Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14:569-573. (Pubitemid 46778892)
22. Rush v Akron General Hospital 171 NE2d 378, 381 (Ohio Ct App 1957).
23. Schleiter KE. When are residents treated as doctors under the law? Virtual Mentor. 2009;11:882.
24. Twerski AD, Cohen NB. The Second Revolution in Informed Consent: Comparing Physicians to Each Other, 94 Nw U L Rev 1, 9 (1999).
25. Whiteside v Lukson, 947 P2d 1263, 1265 (Wash Ct App 1997).