Erratum to Conflict Resolution as a Dyadic Mediator: Considering the Partner Perspective on Conflict Resolution [European Journal of Personality, 26(3), 221-232] DOI: 10.1002/per.828;Conflict Resolution as a Dyadic Mediator: Considering the Partner Perspective on Conflict Resolution

European Journal of Personality

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 221-232

  Sierau, Susan ^a   Herzberg, Philipp Yorck ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WUPPERTAL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Actor Partner Mediator Model; Attachment; Conflict resolution styles; Relationship satisfaction; Structural equation modelling

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859824756     PISSN: 08902070     EISSN: 10990984     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/per.1928     Document Type: Erratum

References (50)

1. Bandalos, D. E., & Finney, S. J. (2001). Item parceling issues in structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcolides, & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), New developments in structural equation modeling (pp. 269-296). New York: Erlbaum.
2. Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 226-244.
3. Bollen, K. A., & Stine, R. A. (1990). Direct and indirect effects: Classical and bootstrap estimates of variability. In C. C. Clogg (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 115-140). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
4. Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: Vol. 2. Separation: Anxiety and anger. New York: Basic Books.
5. Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In J. A. Simpson, & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46-76). New York: Guilford Press.
6. Cann, A., Norman, M. A., Welbourne, J. L., & Calhoun, L. G. (2008). Attachment styles, conflict styles, and humour styles: Interrelationships and associations with relationship satisfaction. European Journal of Personality, 22, 131-146.
7. Cassidy, J., & Kobak, R. R. (1988). Avoidance and its relation to other defensive processes. In J. Belsky, & T. Nezworski (Eds.), Clinical implications of attachment (pp. 300-323). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
8. Collins, N. L., & Read, S. J. (1990). Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 644-663.
9. Corcoran, K. O. C., & Mallinckrodt, B. (2000). Adult attachment, self-efficacy, perspective taking, and conflict resolution. Journal of Counseling and Development, 78, 473-483.
10. Creasey, G., & Ladd, A. (2005). Generalized and specific attachment representations: Unique and interactive roles in predicting conflict behaviors in close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1026-1038.
11. Crittenden, P. M., Partridge, M. F., & Claussen, A. H. (1991). Family patterns of relationship in normative and dysfunctional families. Development and Psychopathology, 3, 491-512.
12. Crowell, J. A., Fraley, R. C., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Measurement of individual differences in adolescent and adult attachment. In J. Cassidy, & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 434-465). New York: Guilford Press.
13. Ehrenthal, J. C., Dinger, U., & Schauenburg, H. (2006). Erste Ergebnisse der Evaluation einer deutschsprachigen Version des Bindungsfragebogens 'Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised' (ECR-R) [First results of the evaluation of a German-language version of the interdependency survey 'Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised']. Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, Medizinische Psychologie, 56, 85-85.
14. Fairchild, A. J., & Finney, S. J. (2006). Investigating validity evidence for the Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised Questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 116-135.
15. Feeney, J. A. (1999). Adult romantic attachment and couple relationships. In J. Cassidy, & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), The handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 355-377). New York: Guilford.
16. Gottman, J. M., & Driver, J. (2005). Dysfunctional marital conflict and everyday marital interaction. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 43, 63-77.
17. Gottman, J. M., & Krokoff, L. J. (1989). Marital interaction and satisfaction: A longitudinal view. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 47-52.
18. Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511-524.
19. Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1994). Attachment as an organizational framework for research on close relationships. Psychological Inquiry, 5, 1-22.
20. Herzberg, P. Y., & Sierau, S.(2010). Das Konfliktlösungsstil-Inventar für Paare (KSIP): Psychometrische Eigenschaften und Validierung der autorisierten deutschsprachigen Übersetzung [The German version of the Conflict Resolution Styles Inventory (CRSI): Psychometric properties and validation of the authorized German version]. Diagnostica, 56, 94-107.
21. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1-55.
22. Hunsley, J., Pinsent, C., Lefebvre, M., Jamey-Tanner, S., & Vito, D.. (1995). Construct validity of the short forms of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Family Relations, 11, 231-237.
23. Kashy, D. A., & Kenny, D. A. (2000). The analysis of data from dyads and groups. In H. T. Reis, & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Kelloway, E. K. (1996). Common practices in structural equation modeling. In C. L. Cooper, & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 141-178). New York: Wiley.
25. Kenny, D., & Cook, W. (1999). Partner effects in relationship research: Conceptual issues, analytic difficulties, and illustrations. Personal Relationships, 6, 433-448.
26. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
27. Kobak, R., & Duemmler, S. (1994). Attachment and conversation: Toward a discourse analysis of adolescent and adult security. Attachment processes in adulthood, 5, 121-149.
28. Kurdek, L. A. (1994). Conflict resolution styles in gay, lesbian, heterosexual nonparent, and heterosexual parent couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 705-722.
29. Kurdek, L. A. (1995). Predicting change in marital satisfaction from husbands' and wives' conflict resolution styles. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 153-164.
30. Ledermann, T., & Bodenmann, G. (2006). Moderator- und Mediatoreffekte bei dyadischen Daten. Zwei Erweiterungen des Akteur-Partner-Interdependenz-Modells [Moderator and mediator effects in dyadic research: Two extensions of the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 37, 27-40.
31. Luo, S., & Klohnen, E. C. (2005). Assortative mating and marital quality in newlyweds: A couple-centered approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 304-326.
32. MacKinnon, D. P., Warsi, G., & Dwyer, J. H. (1995). A simulation study of mediated effect measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 41-62.
33. Marchand, J. F. (2004). Husbands' and wives' marital quality: The role of adult attachment orientations, depressive symptoms, and conflict resolution behaviors. Attachment and Human Development, 6, 99-112.
34. Mikulincer, M., Gillath, O., & Shaver, P. R. (2002). Activation of the attachment system in adulthood: Threat-related primes increase the accessibility of mental representations of attachment figures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 881-895.
35. Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2003). The attachment behavioral system in adulthood: Activation, psychodynamics, and interpersonal processes. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 56-152). San Diego: Academic Press.
36. Olsen, J. A., & Kenny, D. A. (2006). Structural equation modeling with interchangeable dyads. Psychological Methods, 11, 127-141.
37. Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 17-59). New York: Academic Press.
38. Pietromonaco, P. R., Greenwood, D., & Barrett, L. F. (2004). Conflict in adult close relationships: An attachment perspective. In W. S. Rholes, & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), Adult attachment (pp. 267-299). New York: Guilford Press.
39. Pistole, M. C., & Arricale, F.. (2003). Understanding attachment: Beliefs about conflict. Journal of Counseling and Development, 81, 318-328.
40. Roisman, G., Holland, A., Fortuna, K., Fraley, R., Clausell, E., & Clarke, A.. (2007). The Adult Attachment Interview and self-reports of attachment style: An empirical rapprochement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 678-397.
41. Schwarz, G.. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461-464.
42. Sharpley, C. F., & Cross, D. G. (1982). A psychometric evaluation of the Spanier Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 739-741.
43. Shaver, P. R., & Hazan, C.. (1993). Adult romantic attachment: Theory and evidence. In D. Perlman, & W. Jones (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships (Vol. 4, pp. 29-70). London: Jessica Kingsley.
44. Shi, L. (2003). The association between adult attachment styles and conflict resolution in romantic relationships. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 31, 143-157.
45. Sibley, C. G., Fisher, R., & Liu, J. H. (2005). Reliability and validity of the Revised Experiences in Close Relationships (ECRR) self-report measure of adult romantic attachment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1524-1536.
46. Simpson, J., & Rholes, W. (1994). Stress and secure base relationships in adulthood. Attachment Processes in Adulthood, 5, 181-204.
47. Simpson, J. A., Rholes, W., & Phillips, D.. (1996). Conflict in close relationships: An attachment perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 899-914.
48. Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 13, 290-312.
49. Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15-28.
50. Wampler, K. S., Shi, L., Nelson, B. S., & Kimball, T. G. (2003). The adult attachment interview and observed couple interaction: Implications for an intergenerational perspective on couple therapy. Family Process, 42, 497-515.