The German version of the Conflict Resolution Styles Inventory (CRSI) - Psychometric properties and validation of the authorized German version;Das Konfliktlösungsstil-Inventar für Paare (KSIP): Psychometrische Eigenschaften und Validierung der autorisierten deutschsprachigen Übersetzung

Diagnostica

Volumn 56, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 94-107

  Herzberg, Philipp Yorck ^a   Sierau, Susan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL LEIPZIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

CFA; Conflict resolution styles; Conflict Resolution Styles Inventory (CRSI); Couple assessment; Psychometric properties

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952278856     PISSN: 00121924     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1026/0012-1924/a000014     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Acitelli, L. K., Douvan, E. & Veroff, J. (1993). Perceptions of conflict in the first year of marriage: How important are similarity and understanding? Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 5-19.
2. Arellano, Ch. M. & Markman, H. J. (1995). The managing affect and differences scale (MADS): A self-report measure assessing conflict management in couples. Journal ofFamily Psychology, 9, 319-344.
3. Balsam, K. F., Beauchaine, T. P., Rothblum, E. D. & Solomon, S. E. (2008). Three-year follow-up of same-sex couples who had civil unions in Vermont, same-sex couples not in civil unions, and heterosexual married couples. Developmental Psychology, 44, 102-116.
4. Beauducel, A. & Herzberg, P. Y. (2006). On the performance of Maximum Likelihood versus Means and Variance Adjusted Weighted Least Squares estimation in CFA. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 186-203. (Pubitemid 43812907)
5. Bodenmann, G. (2001). Psychologische Risikofaktoren für Scheidung: Ein überblick Psychologische Rundschau, 52, 85-95.
6. Bodenmann, G. (2007). Dyadisches Coping Inventar (DCI). Testmanual. Göttingen: Hogrefe .
7. Borkenau, P. & Ostendorf, F. (1993). Neo-Fünf-Faktoren Inventar (NEO-FFI) nach Costa und McCrae. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
8. Bowman, M. L. (1990). Coping efforts and marital satisfaction-Measuring Marital coping and its correlates. Journal ofMar-riage and the Family, 52, 463-474.
9. Bradbury, T. N., Fincham, F. D. & Beach, S. R. H. (2000). Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 964-980.
10. Bradbury, T. N., Rogge, R. & Lawrence, E. (2001). Reconsidering the role of conflict in marriage. In A. Booth, A. C. Crou-ter & M. Clements (Eds.), Couples in conflict (pp. 59-81). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Brähler, E. & Brähler, C. (1993). Paardiagnostik mit dem Gieβen-Test. Bern: Huber.
12. Campbell, L., Lackenbauer, S. D. & Muise, A. (2006). When is being known or adored by romantic partners most beneficial? Self-perceptions, relationship length, and responses to partner's verifying and enhancing appraisals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1283-1294. (Pubitemid 44327587)
13. Caughlin, J. P. & Huston, T. L. (2002). A contextual analysis of the association between demand/withdraw and marital satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 9, 95-119.
14. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2 ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G. & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3 ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Cohen, S., Kamarck, T. & Mermelstein, R. A. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 385-396.
17. Cramer, D. (2000). Relationship satisfaction and conflict style in romantic relationships. Journal of Psychology, 134, 337-341.
18. Christensen, A. (1988). Dysfunctional interactional patterns in couples. In P. Noller & M. A. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Perspectives on marital interaction (pp. 31-52). Clevedon, Avon, England: Multilingual Matters.
19. Dinkel, A. & Balck, F. (2005). An evaluation of the German Relationship Assessment Scale. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 64, 259-263. (Pubitemid 43275460)
20. Eldridge, K. A. & Christensen, A. (2002). Demand-withdraw communication during couple conflict: A review and analysis. In P. Noller & J. A. Feeney (Eds.), Understanding. Marriage: Developments in the Study of Couple Interaction (pp. 289-322). Cambridge: Cambridge Press.
21. Fincham, F. D. & Beach, S. R. H. (1999). Conflict in marriage: Implications for working with couples. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 47-77.
22. Fincham, F. D. (2003). Marital conflict: Correlates, structure, and context. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 23-27.
23. Gottman, J. M. (1993). The roles of conflict engagement, escalation, and avoidance in marital interaction: A longitudinal view of five types of couples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 6-15.
24. Gottman, J. M. (1994). What predicts divorce? The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes: Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Gottman, J. M. (1999). The marriage clinic: New York: W. W. Norton.
26. Gottman, J. M. & Krokoff, L. J. (1989). Marital interaction and satisfaction-A longitudinal view. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 47-52.
27. Grob, A., Lüthi, R., Kaiser, F. G., Flammer, A., Mackinnon, A. & Wearing, A. J. (1991). Berner Fragebogen zum Wohlbefinden Jugendlicher (BFW). Diagnostica, 37, 66-75.
28. Hahlweg, K., Klann, N. & Hank, G. (1992). Zur Erfassung der Ehequalität: Ein Vergleich der "Dyadic Adjustment Scale" (DAS) und des "Partnerschaftsfragebogens" (PFB). Diagnostica, 38, 312-327.
29. Hambleton, R. K. (1993). Translating achievement tests for use in cross-national studies. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 9, 57-68.
30. Heavey, C. L., Layne, C. & Christensen, A. (1993). Gender and conflict structure in marital interaction-A replication and extension. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 16-27. (Pubitemid 23142094)
31. Hendrick, S. S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 93-98.
32. Herzberg, P. Y. (2002). Zur psychometrischen Optimierung einer Reaktanzskala mittels klassischer und IRT-basierter Analysemethoden. Diagnostica, 48, 163-171.
33. Holman, T. B. & Jarvis, M. O. (2003). Hostile, volatile, avoiding, and validating couple-conflict types: An investigation of Gottman's couple-conflict types. Personal Relationships, 10, 267-282.
34. Hu, L. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteriea versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
35. Hunsley, J., Vito, D., Pinsent, C., James, S. & Lefebvre, M. (1996). Are self-report measures of dyadic relationships influenced by impression management biases? Journal of Family Psychology, 10, 322-330. (Pubitemid 126333668)
36. Jöreskog, K. G. & Sörbom, D. (2006). LISREL 8.80. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
37. Kaiser, P. (Hrsg.). (2000). Partnerschaft und Paartherapie. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
38. Kapp, F. (2002). Zorn in Partnerschaften: Ein Vergleich des Ärger-und Konfliktverhaltens bei zufriedenen und unzufriedenen Paaren unter Berücksichtigung Subjektiver Theorien. Unveröffentliche Dissertation. Universität Heidelberg.
39. Karney, B. R. & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability-A review of theory, method, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 3-34.
40. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A. & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
41. Kurdek, L. A. (1994). Conflict-Resolution Styles in Gay, Lesbian, Heterosexual Nonparent, and Heterosexual Parent Couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 705-722.
42. Kurdek, L. A. (1995). Predicting Change in Marital Satisfaction from Husbands and Wives Conflict-Resolution Styles. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 153-164.
43. Kurdek, L. A. (2003). Methodological issues in growth-curve analyses with married couples. Personal Relationships, 10, 235-266.
44. Lee-Baggley, D., Preece, M. & DeLongis, A. (2005). Coping with interpersonal stress: Role of Big Five Traits. Journal of Personality, 73 (5), 1141-1180. (Pubitemid 41360067)
45. Lee, S.-Y., Poon, W. Y. & Bentler, P. M. (1995). A two-stage estimation of structural equation models with continuous and polytomous variables. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 48, 339-358.
46. Lienert, G. A. & Raatz, U. (1998). Testaufbau und Testanalyse (6. Aufl.). Weinheim: Beltz.
47. Marchand, J. F. (2004). Husbands' and wives' marital quality: The role of adult attachment orientations, depressive symptoms, and conflict resolution behaviors. Attachment & Human Development, 6, 99-112.
48. Markman, H. J., Stanley, S. M. & Blumberg, S. L. (2001). Fighting for your marriage: San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
49. Marshall, G. N., Wortman, C. B., Vickers, R. R., Kusulas, J. W. & Hervig, L. K. (1994). The five-factor model of personality as a framework for personality-health research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 278-286.
50. McCrae, R. R. & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1999). A five-factor theory of personality. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality theory and research (pp. 139-153). New York: Guilford Press.
51. Neufeld, J. (2007). Adolescents' romantic attachment style, conflict goals and strategies: A mediational analysis. Bowling Green State University.
52. Neyer, F. J. (1998). Zum Umgang mit dyadischen Daten: Neue Methoden für die Sozialpsychologie. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 29, 291-306.
53. Sander, J. & Böcker, S. (1993). Die deutsche Form der Relationship Assessment Scale (RAS): Eine kurze Skala zur Messung der Zufriedenheit in einer Partnerschaft. Diagnostica, 39, 55-62.
54. Schmitt, M. & Eid, M. (2007). Richtlinien für die Übersetzung fremdsprachlicher Messinstrumente. Diagnostica, 53, 1-2.
55. Schneewind, K. A. & Gerhard, A. K. (2002). Relationship personality, conflict resolution, and marital satisfaction in the first 5 years of marriage. Family Relations, 51, 63-71.
56. Sharpley, C. F. & Cross, D. G. (1982). A psychometric evaluation of the Spanier Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 739-741.
57. Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15-28.
58. Story, L. B. & Bradbury, T. N. (2004). Understanding marriage and stress: Essential questions and challenges. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1139-1162.
59. Thomas, K. (1976). Conflict and conflict management. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 889-935). Chicago: Rand McNally College.
60. Vaughn, M. J. & Baier, M. E. M. (1999). Reliability and validity of the Relationship Assessment Scale. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 27, 137-147.
61. Weinmann-Lutz, B. (2001). Kooperation und Konfliktlösung bei Scheidungspaaren in Mediation. Eine theoretische und empirische Untersuchung von Geschlechtsunterschieden und Effekten. Aachen: Shaker Verlag.
62. Williams, L. M. (1995). Associations of stressful life events and marital quality. Psychological Reports, 76, 1115-1122.
63. Wittmann, W. W. (1987). Grundlagen erfolgreicher Forschung in der Psychologie: Multimodale Diagnostik, Multiplismus, multivariate Reliabilitäts-und Validitätstheorie. Diagnostica, 33, 209-226.