Visual Rivalry Without Spatial Conflict

Psychological Science

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 410-418

  van Boxtel, Jeroen J A ^a   Koch, Christof ^a,b  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b ALLEN INSTITUTE FOR BRAIN SCIENCE   (United States)

Author keywords

ambiguous motion quartet; object based; retinotopic; rivalry; spatial perception; spatiotopic; visual perception

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859817176     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: 14679280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0956797611424165     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Binocular rivalry. Alais D.Blake R., ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2005:.
2. Andrews T.J.,Lotto R.B.Fusion and rivalry are dependent on the perceptual meaning of visual stimuli.Current Biology. 2004;14:418-423.
3. Blake R.A neural theory of binocular rivalry.Psychological Review. 1989;96:145-167.
4. Blake R.,Logothetis N.K.Visual competition.Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2002;3:13-21.
5. Blake R.,Sobel K.V.,Gilroy L.A.Visual motion retards alternations between conflicting perceptual interpretations.Neuron. 2003;39:869-878.
6. BoiM.ÖǧmenH.KrummenacherJ.OttoT. U.HerzogM. H. (2009). A (fascinating) litmus test for human retino- vs. non- retinotopic processing. Journal of Vision, 9(13), Article 5. Retrieved from http://www.journalofvision.org/content/9/13/5.
7. Bonneh Y.S.,Cooperman A.,Sagi D.Motion-induced blindness in normal observers.Nature. 2001;411:798-801.
8. Carter O.,Konkle T.,Wang Q.,Hayward V.,Moore C.Tactile rivalry demonstrated with an ambiguous apparent-motion quartet.Current Biology. 2008;18:1050-1054.
9. Graf E.W.,Adams W.J.,Lages M.Modulating motion-induced blindness with depth ordering and surface completion.Vision Research. 2002;42:2731-2735.
10. Haynes J.-D.,Deichmann R.,Rees G.Eye-specific effects of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus.Nature. 2005;438:496-499.
11. He Z.J.,Ooi T.L.Perceptual organization of apparent motion in the Ternus display.Perception. 1999;28:877-892.
12. Hock H.S.,Schoner G.,Hochstein S.Perceptual stability and the selective adaptation of perceived and unperceived motion directions.Vision Research. 1996;36:3311-3323.
13. Kaufman L.On the spread of suppression and binocular rivalry.Vision Research. 1963;61:401-415.
14. Kovács I.,Papathomas T.V.,Yang M.,Fehér Á.When the brain changes its mind: Interocular grouping during binocular rivalry.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA. 1996;93:15508-15511.
15. Leopold D.A.,Logothetis N.K.Multistable phenomena: Changing views in perception.Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 1999;3:254-264.
16. Logothetis N.K.,Schall J.D.Neuronal correlates of subjective visual perception.Science. 1989;245:761-763.
17. MaierA.LogothetisN. K.LeopoldD. A. (2005). Global competition dictates local suppression in pattern rivalry. Journal of Vision, 5(9), Article 2. Retrieved from http://www.journalofvision.org/content/5/9/2.
18. Maruya K.,Yang E.,Blake R.Voluntary action influences visual competition.Psychological Science. 2007;18:1090-1098.
19. MengM.TongF. (2004). Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures. Journal of Vision, 4(7), Article 2. Retrieved from http://www.journalofvision.org/content/4/7/2.
20. Mitchell J.F.,Stoner G.R.,Reynolds J.H.Object-based attention determines dominance in binocular rivalry.Nature. 2004;429:410-413.
21. Moutoussis K.,Keliris G.,Kourtzi Z.,Logothetis N.A binocular rivalry study of motion perception in the human brain.Vision Research. 2005;45:2231-2243.
22. MuckliL.KohlerA.KriegeskorteN.SingerW. (2005). Primary visual cortex activity along the apparent-motion trace reflects illusory perception. PLoS Biology, 3(8), e265. Retrieved from http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.0030265.
23. O'Craven K.M.,Downing P.E.,Kanwisher N.fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection.Nature. 1999;401:584-587.
24. Olson C.R.Object-based vision and attention in primates.Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 2001;11:171-179.
25. Pantle A.,Picciano L.A multistable movement display: Evidence for two separate motion systems in human vision.Science. 1976;193:500-502.
26. Polonsky A.,Blake R.,Braun J.,Heeger D.J.Neuronal activity in human primary visual cortex correlates with perception during binocular rivalry.Nature Neuroscience. 2000;3:1153-1159.
27. Ramachandran V.S.,Anstis S.M.Perceptual organization in moving patterns.Nature. 1983;304:529-531.
28. Silver M.A.,Logothetis N.K.Grouping and segmentation in binocular rivalry.Vision Research. 2004;44:1675-1692.
29. Sterzer P.,Kleinschmidt A.A neural basis for inference in perceptual ambiguity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA. 2007;104:323-328.
30. Tong F.,Engel S.A.Interocular rivalry revealed in the human cortical blind-spot representation.Nature. 2001;411:195-199.
31. Tong F.,Meng M.,Blake R.Neural bases of binocular rivalry.Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2006;10:502-511.
32. van BoxtelJ. J. A.AlaisD.van EeR. (2008). Retinotopic and non-retinotopic stimulus encoding in binocular rivalry and the involvement of feedback. Journal of Vision, 8(5), Article 17. Retrieved from http://www.journalofvision.org/content/8/5/17.
33. van BoxtelJ. J. A.WexlerM.DroulezJ. (2003). Perception of plane orientation from self-generated and passively observed optic flow. Journal of Vision, 3(5), Article 1. Retrieved from http://www.journalofvision.org/content/3/5/1.
34. van DamL. C.van EeR. (2006). Retinal image shifts, but not eye movements per se, cause alternations in awareness during binocular rivalry. Journal of Vision, 6(11), Article 3. Retrieved from http://www.journalofvision.org/content/6/11/3.
35. van Ee R.,van Dam L.C.,Brouwer G.J.Voluntary control and the dynamics of perceptual bi-stability.Vision Research. 2005;45:41-55.
36. Watson T.L.,Pearson J.,Clifford C.W. G.Perceptual grouping of biological motion promotes binocular rivalry.Current Biology. 2004;14:1670-1674.
37. Wilke M.,Logothetis N.K.,Leopold D.A.Generalized flash suppression of salient visual targets.Neuron. 2003;39:1043-1052.
38. Williams Z.M.,Elfar J.C.,Eskandar E.N.,Toth L.J.,Assad J.A.Parietal activity and the perceived direction of ambiguous apparent motion.Nature Neuroscience. 2003;6:616-623.
39. Wunderlich K.,Schneider K.A.,Kastner S.Neural correlates of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus.Nature Neuroscience. 2005;8:1595-1602.
40. Zhuo Y.,Zhou T.G.,Rao H.Y.,Wang J.J.,Meng M.,Chen M.,... Chen L.Contributions of the visual ventral pathway to long-range apparent motion.Science. 2003;299:417-420.