Online versus face-to-face deliberation: Who? Why? What? With what effects?

New Media and Society

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 363-383

  Baek, Young Min ^a   Wojcieszak, Magdalena ^b   Delli Carpini, Michael X ^c  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^b IE UNIVERSITY   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

face to face deliberation; online deliberation; political discussion; public sphere

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859816032     PISSN: 14614448     EISSN: 14617315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1461444811413191     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Arendt HBetween Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought. New York: Viking Press; 1968:.
2. Aronson J,Lustina MJ,Good C,Keough K,Steele CM,Brown J.When white men can't do math: Necessary and sufficient factors in stereotype threat.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 1999;35 (1): 29-46.
3. Bargh JA,McKenna KYA,Fitzsimons GM.Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the 'true self' on the internet.Journal of Social Issues. 2002;58 (1): 33-48.
4. Benhabib SDemocracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Benhabib S, ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1996:67-94.
5. Bishop B.Trends in polarization, public opinion. Paper presented at Polarization of American Politics: Myth or Reality?; 2004 Princeton University; 2004.
6. Blader SL,Tyler TR.A four-component model of procedural justice: Defining the meaning of a 'fair' process.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2003;29 (6): 747-758.
7. Bornstein G,Rapoport A.Intergroup competition for the provision of step-level public goods: Effects of preplay communication.European Journal of Social Psychology. 1988;18 (2): 125-142.
8. Brunsting S,Postmes T.Social movement participation in the digital age: Predicting offline and online collective action.Small Group Research. 2002;33 (5): 525-554.
9. Denton RE.Religion and the 2004 presidential campaign.American Behavioral Scientist. 2005;49 (1): 11-31.
10. Fishkin JSThe Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1995:.
11. Fraser N.Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy.Social Text. 1990;25/26:56-80.
12. Garrett RK.Protest in an information society: A review of literature on social movements and new ICTs.Information, Communication & Society. 2006;9 (2): 202-224.
13. Gastil J,Dillard JP.Increasing political sophistication through public deliberation.Political Communication. 1999;16 (1): 3-23.
14. Gutmann A,Thompson DDemocracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 1996:.
15. Habermas JThe Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1991:.
16. Hill KA,Hughes JE.Computer-mediated political communication: The usenet and political communities.Political Communication. 1997;14 (1): 3-27.
17. Jacobs LR,Cook FL,Delli Carpini MXTalking Together: Public Deliberation and Political Participation in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2009:.
18. Jennings MK,Zeitner V.Internet use and civic engagement.Public Opinion Quarterly. 2003;67 (3): 311-334.
19. Luskin RC, Fishkin JS and Iyengar S (2006) Considered Opinions on U.S. Foreign Policy: Evidence from Online and Face-to-Face Deliberative Polling. Available at: cdd.stanford.edu/research/papers/2006/foreign-policy.pdf (accessed 3 September 2010).
20. Luskin RC,Fishkin JS,Jowell R.Considered opinions: Deliberative polling in Britain.British Journal of Political Science. 2002;32 (03): 455-487.
21. McKenna KYA,Bargh JA.Plan 9 from cyberspace: The implications of the internet for personality and social psychology.Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2000;4 (1): 57-75.
22. McLeod JM,Scheufele DA,Moy P,Horowitz EM,Holbert RL,Zhang W,Zubric S,Zubric J.Understanding deliberation: The effects of discussion networks on participation in a public forum.Communication Research. 1999;26 (6): 743-774.
23. Mendelberg TMicropolitics: Political Decisionmaking, Deliberation and Participation. Delli Carpini MHuddy LShapiro R, ed. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press; 2002:151-193.
24. Mendelberg T,Oleske J.Race and public deliberation.Political Communication. 2000;17 (2): 169-191.
25. Micheletti M,Stolle D.Mobilizing consumers to take responsibility for global social justice.The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 2007;611 (1): 157-175.
26. Mill JSOn Liberty. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill; 1956:.
27. Mouffe CThe Democratic Paradox. London: Verso; 2000:.
28. Mutz DC.Cross-cutting social networks: Testing democratic theory in practice.American Political Science Review. 2002;96 (1): 111-126.
29. National Telecommunications and Information Administration (2010) Digital Nation: 21st Century America's Progress toward Universal Broadband Internet Access. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce. Available at: http://www.ntia.doc.gov/reports/2010/NTIA_internet_use_report_Feb2010.pdf (accessed 3 September 2010).
30. Negt O,Kluge APublic Sphere and Experience: Toward an Analysis of the Bourgeois and Proletarian Public Sphere. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota; 1993:.
31. Norris PDigital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2001:.
32. Page BIWho Deliberates? Mass Media in Modern Democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1996:.
33. Pantti M,van Zoonen L.Do crying citizens make good citizens?.Social Semiotics. 2006;16 (2): 205-224.
34. Papacharissi Z.The virtual sphere: The internet as a public sphere.New Media & Society. 2002;4 (1): 9-27.
35. Patterson TEThe Vanishing Voter: Public Involvement in an Age of Uncertainty. New York: Vintage Books; 2003:.
36. Pearce WB,Littlejohn SWMoral Conflict: When Social Worlds Collide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1997:.
37. Postmes TOM,Spears R,Lea M.Breaching or building social boundaries? Side-effects of computer-mediated communication.Communication Research. 1998;25 (6): 689-715.
38. Price V,Cappella JN.Online deliberation and its influence: The Electoral Dialogue Project in Campaign 2000.IT and Society. 2002;1 (1): 303-329.
39. Putnam RDBowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster; 2001:.
40. Rosenbaum PRObservational Studies. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2002:.
41. Sally D.Conversation and cooperation in social dilemmas: A meta-analysis of experiments from 1958 to 1992.Rationality and Society. 1995;7 (1): 58-92.
42. Sanders LM.Against deliberation.Political Theory. 1997;25 (3): 347-376.
43. Stromer-Galley J (2003) Diversity of political conversation on the internet: Users' perspectives. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication 8(3). Available at: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol8/issue3/stromergalley.html (accessed 3 September 2010).
44. Sunstein CRepublic.com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2001:.
45. Walzer MPolitics and Passion: Toward a More Egalitarian Liberalism. New Haven, CT: Yale University; 2004:.
46. Warren ME.Democratic theory and self-transformation.American Political Science Review. 1992;86 (1): 8-23.
47. Warren MEDemocracy and Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999:.
48. Wojcieszak ME,Mutz DC.Online groups and political discourse: Do online discussion spaces facilitate exposure to political disagreement?.Journal of Communication. 2009;59 (1): 40-56.
49. Wojcieszak ME,Baek YM,Delli Carpini MX (2009) What is really going on? Structure underlying face-to-face and online deliberation.Information, Communication & Society. 2009;12 (7): 1080-1102.
50. Zukin C,Keeter S,Audolina M,Jenkins K,Delli Carpini MXA New Engagement?. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006:.