Developmental Relationships as the Active Ingredient: A Unifying Working Hypothesis of "What Works" Across Intervention Settings

American Journal of Orthopsychiatry

Volumn 82, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 157-166

  Li, Junlei ^a   Julian, Megan M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

At risk children; At risk youth; Children; Classroom environment; Developmental relationships; Fading; Home visiting programs; Mentoring; Orphanages; Scaffolding; Youth

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; CLINICAL PRACTICE; EMOTIONAL ATTACHMENT; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH PROGRAM; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; JUVENILE; LEARNING; MEDICAL RESEARCH; SCHOOL; SOCIAL INTERACTION;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT DEVELOPMENT; CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; HOUSE CALLS; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ORPHANAGES; PROGRAM EVALUATION; SCHOOLS;

EID: 84859812473     PISSN: 00029432     EISSN: 19390025     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-0025.2012.01151.x     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Bickman, L. (1996). A continuum of care: More is not always better. American Psychologist, 51, 689-701.
2. Bradley, E. H., Curry, L. A., Ramanadhan, S., Rowe, L., Nembhard, I. M., & Krumholz, H. M. (2009). Research in action: Using positive deviance to improve quality of health care. Implementation Science, 4, 25.
3. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32-41.
5. Casler, L. (1965). The effects of extra tactile stimulation on a group of institutionalized infants. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 71, 137-175.
6. Chisholm, K. (1998). A three-year follow-up of attachment and indiscriminate friendliness in children adopted from Romanian orphanages. Child Development, 69, 1092-1106.
7. Coffman, J., Wright, M. S., & Bruner, C. (2006). Beyond parallel play: Emerging state and community planning roles in building early learning systems. Retrieved from.
8. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1990). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematicsL. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453-494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. Dickens, J., & Groza, V. (2004). Empowerment in difficulty: A critical appraisal of international intervention in child welfare in Romania. International Social Work, 47, 469-487.
10. Dobbie, W., & Fryer, R. (2011). Are high quality schools enough to increase achievement among the poor? Evidence from the Harlem Children's Zone. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 3(3), 158-187.
11. Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
12. Embry, D. D. (2004). Community-based prevention using simple, low-cost, evidence-based kernels and behavior vaccines. Journal of Community Psychology, 32, 575-591.
13. Embry, D. D., & Biglan, A. (2008). Evidence-based kernels: Fundamental units of behavioral influence. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 11, 75-113.
14. Fryer, R. (2010). Financial incentives and student achievement: Evidence from randomized trials (National Bureau for Economic Research Working Paper No. 15898). Retrieved from.
15. Fulbright-Anderson, K., & Auspos, P. (Eds.). (2006). Community change: Theories, practice, and evidence. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
16. Gomby, D., Culcross, P., & Behrman, R. (1999). Home visiting: Recent program evaluations-analysis and recommendations. The Future of Children, 9, 4-26.
17. Granger, R. C. (2008). After-school programs and academics: Implications for policy, practice, and research. Society for Research in Child Development Social Policy Report, 22(2), 3-19.
18. Grossman, J. B., & Tierney, J. P. (1998). Does mentoring work? An impact study of the Big Brothers Big Sisters program. Evaluation Review, 22, 403-426.
19. Guralnick, M. J. (2011). Why early intervention works: A systems perspective. Infants & Young Children, 24, 6-28.
20. Haberman, M. (1991). The pedagogy of poverty versus good teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 73, 290-294.
21. Hakimi-Manesh, Y., Mojdehi, J., & Tashakkori, A. (1984). Short communication: Effects of environmental enrichment on the mental and psychomotor development of orphanage children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 25, 643-650.
22. Halpern, R. (2005). Confronting the big lie: The need to reframe expectations of afterschool programs. New York, NY: Partnership for After School Education.
23. Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2001). Early teacher-child relationships and the trajectory of children's school outcomes through eighth grade. Child Development, 72, 625-638.
24. Hanushek, E., & Raymond, M. (2005). Does school accountability lead to improved student performance? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24, 297-327.
25. Hendricks, M., Plantz, M. C., & Pritchard, K. J. (2008). Measuring outcomes of United Way-funded programs: Expectations and realityJ. G. Carman & K. A. Fredericks (Eds.), Nonprofits and evaluation. New directions for evaluation (pp. 13-35). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
26. Herrera, C., Grossman, J. B., Kauh, T. J., Feldman, A. F., & McMaken, J. (2007). Making a difference in schools: The Big Brothers Big Sisters school-based mentoring impact study. Philadelphia, PA: Public/Private Ventures.
27. Korfmacher, J., Kitzman, H., & Olds, D. (1998). Intervention processes as predictors of outcomes in a preventive home-visitation program. Journal of Community Psychology, 26, 49-64.
28. Levitt, R., Janta, B., & Wegrich, K. (2008). Accountability of teachers: Literature review. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
29. MacLean, K. (2003). The impact of institutionalization on child development. Development and Psychopathology, 15, 853-884.
30. Marsh, D. R., Schroeder, D. G., Dearden, K. A., Sternin, J., & Sternin, M. (2004). The power of positive deviance. British Medical Journal, 329, 1177-1179.
31. Morrow, K. V., & Styles, M. B. (1995). Building relationships with youth in program settings: A study of Big Brothers/Big Sisters. Philadelphia, PA: Public/Private Ventures.
32. Murnane, R. J., & Cohen, D. K. (1986). Merit pay and the evaluation problem: Why most merit pay plans fail and a few survive. Harvard Educational Review, 56, 1-17.
33. National Scientific Council on the Developing Child. (2004). Young children develop in an environment of relationships (Working Paper No. 1). Retrieved from.
34. Newmann, F., King, M., & Rigdon, M. (1997). Accountability and school performance: Implications from restructuring schools. Harvard Educational Review, 67, 41-74.
35. Olds, D., & Kitzman, H. (1993). Review of research on home visiting for pregnant women and parents of young children. The Future of Children, 3, 53-92.
36. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
37. Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (2004). Realistic evaluationS. Matthieson (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of evaluation (pp. 362-367). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
38. Pianta, R. C., Belsky, J., Houts, R., & Morrison, F. (2007). Opportunities to learn in America's elementary classrooms. Science, 315, 1795-1796.
39. Schambra, W. (2011). Measurement is a futile way to approach grant making. Chronicle of Philanthropy, 23(6), 1. Retrieved from.
40. Schoenfeld, A. (2006). What doesn't work: The challenge and failure of the What Works Clearinghouse to conduct meaningful reviews of studies of mathematics curricula. Educational Researcher, 35, 13-21.
41. Schwartz, B. (2001). The costs of living: How market freedom erodes the best things in life. Princeton, NJ: Xlibris.
42. Smith, L. B., & Thelen, E. (2003). Development as a dynamic system. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 343-348.
43. Spencer, J. P., Clearfield, M., Corbetta, D., Ulrich, B., Buchanan, P., & Schöner, G. (2006). Moving toward a grand theory of development: In memory of Esther Thelen. Child Development, 77, 1521-1538.
44. Stecher, B., & Kirby, S. N. (Eds.). (2004). Organizational improvement and accountability: Lessons for education from other sectors. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
45. Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world's teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York, NY: Free Press.
46. Sweet, M., & Appelbaum, M. (2004). Is home visiting an effective strategy? A meta-analytic review of home visiting programs for families with young children. Child Development, 75, 1435-1456.
47. The St. Petersburg-USA Orphanage Research Team. (2008). The effects of early social-emotional and relationship experience on the development of young orphanage children. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 73(3), 1-297.
48. Thompson, R. A. (2006). The development of the person: Social understanding, relationships, conscience, selfW. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.). Handbook of child psychology. Social, emotional, and personality development (Vol. 3, 6th ed., pp. 24-98). New York, NY: Wiley.
49. Toppo, G. (2007, April 11). Usefulness of education research questioned. USA Today. Retrieved from.
50. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families (2010). Head Start impact study. Final report. Washington, DC: Author.
51. Viadero, D. (2008, December 15). Research effort aims to bury 'nothing works' image. Education Week 28(16).
52. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (pp. 79-91). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
53. Wagner, M. M., & Clayton, S. L. (1999). Parents as Teachers program: Results from two demonstrations. The Future of Children, 9, 91-115.
54. Weiss, H. (1993). Home visits: Necessary but not sufficient. The Future of Children, 3, 113-128.
55. Wheeler, M. E., Keller, T. E., & Dubois, D. L. (2010). Review of three recent randomized trials of school-based mentoring. Social Policy Report, 24(3).
56. Zeldin, S., Camino, L., & Mook, C. (2005). The adoption of innovation in youth organizations: Creating the conditions for youth-adult partnerships. Journal of Community Psychology, 33, 121-135.
57. Zeldin, S., McDaniel, A., Topitzes, D., & Lorens, M. B. (2001). Bringing young people to the table: Effects on adults and youth organizations. Community Youth Development, 2, 21-27.