The invasive Lespedeza cuneata attracts more insect pollinators than native congeners in tallgrass prairie with variable impacts

Biological Invasions

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 1045-1059

  Woods, Teresa M ^a   Jonas, Jayne L ^b   Ferguson, Carolyn J ^a  

^a KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Veterinary Dentistry and Oral Surgery   (United States)

Author keywords

Apis mellifera; Competition; Facilitation; Invasive; Lespedeza; Pollination

Indexed keywords

COLOR; COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); FACILITATION; FLOWER VISITING; FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY; INTERSPECIFIC VARIATION; INVASIVE SPECIES; LEGUME; NATIVE SPECIES; PHENOLOGY; PLANT-POLLINATOR INTERACTION; POLLINATION; POLLINATOR; PRAIRIE; RELATEDNESS; SYMPATRY;

APIS MELLIFERA; APIS MELLIFERA LIGUSTICA; ARTHROPODA; HEXAPODA; LESPEDEZA; LESPEDEZA CUNEATA;

EID: 84859808884     PISSN: 13873547     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-011-0138-0     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Abe T, Wada K, Kato Y, Makino S, Okochi I (2011) Alien pollinator promotes invasive mutualism in an insular pollination system. Biol Invasions 13: 957-967.
2. Allard RW, Babbel GR, Clegg MT, Kahler AL (1972) Evidence for coadaptation in Avena barbata. Proc Natl Acad Sci 69: 3043-3048.
3. Allard RW, García P, Sáenz-de-Miera LE, MPdl Vega (1993) Evolution of multilocus genetic structure in Avena hirtula and Avena barbata. Genetics 135: 1125-1139.
4. Baker HG (1974) The evolution of weeds. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 5: 1-24.
5. Barrat-Segretain MH (2005) Competition between invasive and indigenous species: impact of spatial pattern and developmental stage. Plant Ecol 180: 153-160.
6. Barrett SCH (1992) Genetics of weed invasions. In: Jain SK, Botsford LW (eds) Applied population biology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp 91-119.
7. Barrett SCH (2003) Mating strategies in flowering plants: the outcrossing-selfing paradigm and beyond. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 358: 991-1004.
8. Barrett SCH, Colautti RI, Eckert CG (2008) Plant reproductive systems and evolution during biological invasion. Mol Ecol 17: 373-383.
9. Barthell JF, Randall JM, Thorp RW, Wenner AM (2001) Promotion of seed set in yellow star-thistle by honey bees: evidence of an invasive mutualism. Ecol Appl 11: 1870-1883.
10. Bartomeus I, Vilà M, Santamaría L (2008) Contrasting effects of invasive plants in plant-pollinator networks. Oecologia 155: 761-770.
11. Bjerknes A, Totland Ø, Hegland SJ, Nielsen A (2007) Do alien plant invasions really affect pollination success in native plant species? Biol Conserv 138: 1-12.
12. Bossdorf O, Auge H, Lafuma L, Rogers WE, Siemann E, Prati D (2005) Phenotypic and genetic differentiation between native and introduced plant populations. Oecologia 144: 1-11.
13. Brandon AL, Gibson DJ, Middleton BA (2004) Mechanisms for dominance in an early successional old field by the invasive non-native Lespedeza cuneata (Dum. Cours.) G. Don. Biol Invasions 6: 483-493.
14. Brock JH, Child LE, deWaal LC, Wade M (1995) The invasive nature of Fallopia japonica is enhanced by vegetative regeneration from stem tissues. In: Pyšek P, Prach K, Rejmánek M, Wade M (eds) Plant invasions, general aspects and special problems. SPB Academic Publishing, Amsterdam, pp 131-139.
15. Brown BB, Mitchell RJ (2001) Competition for pollination: effects of pollen of an invasive plant on seed set of a native congener. Oecologia 129: 43-49.
16. Brown BB, Mitchell RJ, Graham SA (2002) Competition for pollination between an invasive species (purple loosestrife) and a native congener. Ecology 83: 2328-2336.
17. Bruno JF, Fridley JD, Bromberg KD, Bertness MD (2005) Insights into biotic interactions from studies of species invasions. In: Sax DF, Stachowicz JJ, Gaines SD (eds) Species invasions: insights into ecology, evolution and biogeography. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, pp 13-40.
18. Callaway RM, Thelen GC, Rodriguez A, Holben WE (2004) Soil biota and exotic plant invasion. Nature 427: 731-733.
19. Carr DE, Dudash MR (2003) Recent approaches into the genetic basis of inbreeding depression in plants. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 358: 1071-1084.
20. Chang SM, Rausher MD (1998) Frequency-dependent pollen discounting contributes to maintenance of a mixed mating system in the common morning glory Ipomoea purpurea. Am Nat 152: 671-683.
21. Chittka L, Schürkens S (2001) Successful invasion of a floral market. Nature 411: 653.
22. Clewell AF (1964) The biology of the common native lespedezas in southern Indiana. Brittonia 16: 208-219.
23. Clewell AF (1966) Natural history, cytology and isolating mechanisms of the native American Lespedezas. Bull Tall Timbers Res Stn 6: 10-12.
24. Cole CT, Biesboer DD (1992) Monomorphism, reduced gene flow, and cleistogamy in rare and common species of Lespedeza (Fabaceae). Am J Bot 79: 567-575.
25. Colwell RK (2005) Estimates: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 7. 5.
26. Cope WA (1966) Cross-pollination in Sericea Lespedeza. Crop Sci 6: 469-470.
27. Cox GW (2004) Alien species and evolution. Island Press, Washington.
28. Daehler CC (1998) Variation in self-fertility and the reproductive advantage of self-fertility for an invading plant (Spartina alterniflora). Evol Ecol 12: 553-568.
29. Dalsgaard B, Gonzalez AMM, Olesen JM, Timmermann A, Andersen LH, Ollerton J (2008) Pollination networks and functional specialization: a test using Lesser Antillean plant-hummingbird assemblages. Oikos 117: 789-793.
30. D'Antonio CM, Hobbie SE (2005) Plant species effects on ecosystem processes. In: Sax DF, Stachowicz JJ, Gaines SD (eds) Species invasions. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, pp 65-84.
31. Dlugosch KM, Parker IM (2008) Founding events in species invasions: genetic variation, adaptive evolution, and the role of multiple introductions. Mol Ecol 17: 431-449.
32. Donnelly ED (1955) The effects of outcrossing on forage and seed yields in sericea lespedeza, L. cuneata. Agron J 47: 466-467.
33. Drake JM, Baggenstos P, Lodge DM (2005) Propagule pressure and persistence in experimental populations. Biol Lett UK 1: 480-483.
34. Goodin DG, Fay PA, McHugh MJ (2003) Climate variability in tallgrass prairie at multiple timescales: Konza Prairie Biological Station. In: Greenland D, Goodin DG, Smith RC (eds) Climate variability and ecosystem response at long-term ecological research sites. Oxford University Press, NY, pp 411-424.
35. Great Plains Flora Association (1986) Flora of the great plains. University Press of Kansas, Lawrence.
36. Gross CL (2001) The effect of introduced honeybees on native bee visitation and fruit-set in Dillwynia juniperina (Fabaceae) in a fragmented ecosystem. Biol Conserv 102: 89-95.
37. Kandori K, Hirao T, Matsunaga S, Kurosaki T (2009) An invasive dandelion unilaterally reduces the reproduction of a native congener through competition for pollination. Oecologia 159: 559-569.
38. Lambrinos JG (2001) The expansion history of a sexual and asexual species of Cortaderia in California, USA. J Ecol 89: 88-98.
39. Lambrinos JG (2004) How interactions between ecology and evolution influence contemporary invasion dynamics. Ecology 85: 2061-2070.
40. Larson KC, Fowler SP, Walker JC (2002) Lack of pollinators limits fruit set in the exotic Lonicera japonica. Am Midl Nat 148: 54-60.
41. Lee CE (2002) Evolutionary genetics of invasive species. Trends Ecol Evol 17: 386-391.
42. Leung B, Drake JM, Lodge DM (2004) Predicting invasions: propagule pressure and the gravity of allee effects. Ecology 85: 1651-1660.
43. Levin DA (2003) Ecological speciation: lessons from invasive species. Syst Bot 28: 643-650.
44. Lloyd DG (1992) Self- and cross-fertilization in plants: the selection of self-fertilization. Int J Plant Sci 153: 370-380.
45. McKey DB, Kaufmann SC (1988) Naturalization of exotic Ficus species (Moraceae) in south Florida. Paper presented at proceedings of the symposium on exotic pest plants 1988. University of Miami, Florida.
46. Mitchell RJ, Flanagan RJ, Brown BJ, Waser NM, Karron JD (2009) New frontiers in competition for pollination. Ann Bot 103: 1403-1413.
47. Moragues E, Traveset A (2005) Effect of Carpobrotus spp. on the pollination success of native plant species of the Balearic Islands. Biol Conserv 122: 611-619.
48. Morales CL, Traveset A (2009) A meta-analysis of impacts of alien vs. native plants on pollinator visitation and reproductive success of co-flowering native plants. Ecol Lett 12: 716-728.
49. Muñoz AA, Cavieres LA (2008) The presense of a showy invasive plant disrupts pollinator service and reproductive output in native alpine species only at high densities. J Ecol 96: 459-467.
50. Nadel H, Frank JH, Knight RJ (1992) Escapees and accomplices: the naturalization of exotic Ficus and their associated faunas in Florida. Fla Entomol 75: 29-38.
51. Nielsen C, Heimes C, Kollmann J (2008) Little evidence for negative effects of an invasive alien plant on pollinator services. Biol Invasions 10: 1353-1363.
52. Novak SJ, Mack RN, Soltis DE (1991) Genetic variation in Bromus tectorum (Poaceae): population differentiation in its North American range. Am J Bot 78: 1150-1161.
53. Ohlenbusch PD, Bidwell T, Fick WH, Scott W, Clubine S, Coffin M (2007) Sericea lespedeza: history, characteristics and identification. Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service, Manhattan.
54. Pannell JR, Barrett SCH (1998) Baker's Law revisited: reproductive assurance in a metapopulation. Evolution 52: 657-668.
55. Pappert RA, Hamrick JL, Donovan LA (2000) Genetic variation in Pueraria lobata (Fabaceae), an introduced, clonal, invasive plant of the southeastern United States. Am J Bot 87: 1240-1245.
56. Parker IM (1997) Pollinator limitation of Cytisus scoparius (scotch broom), an invasive exotic shrub. Ecology 78: 1457-1470.
57. Parker IM, Haubensak KA (2002) Comparative pollinator limitation of two non-native shrubs: do mutualisms influence invasions? Oecologia 130: 250-258.
58. Parker IM, Rodriguez J, Loik ME (2003) An evolutionary approach to understanding the biology of invasions: local adaptation and general-purpose genotypes in the weed Verbascum thapsus. Conserv Biol 17: 59-72.
59. Potts SG (2005) Recording pollinator behaviour on flowers. In: Dafni A, Kevan PG, Husband BC (eds) Practical pollination biology. Enviroquest, Ltd., Cambridge, pp 330-339.
60. Prentis PJ, Wilson JRU, Dormontt EE, Richardson DM, Lowe AJ (2008) Adaptive evolution in invasive species. Trends Plant Sci 13: 288-294.
61. Pyšek P, Mandák B, Francírková T, Prach K (2001) Persistence of stout clonal herbs as invaders in the landscape: a field test of historical records. In: Brundu G, Brock J, Camarda I, Child L, Wade M (eds) Plant invasions: species ecology and ecosystem management. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp 235-244.
62. Rejmánek M, Richardson DM, Higgins SI, Pitcairn MJ, Grotkopp E (2005) Ecology of invasive plants: state of the art. In: Mooney HA, Mack RN, McNeely JA, Neville LE, Schei PJ, Waage JK (eds) Invasive alien species: a new synthesis. Vol 63: SCOPE. Island Press, Washington, pp 104-161.
63. Richardson DM, Allsopp N, D'Antonio CM, Milton SJ, Rejmánek M (2000) Plant invasions-the role of mutualisms. Biol Rev 75: 65-93.
64. Rodger JG, vanKleunen M, Johnson SD (2010) Does specialized pollination impede plant invasions? Int J Plant Sci 171: 382-391.
65. Sargent RD, Ackerly DD (2008) Plant-pollinator interactions and the assembly of plant communities. Trends Ecol Evol 23: 123-130.
66. SAS Institute Inc. (2002-2003) SAS 9. 1 TS level 1M3, Cary, NC.
67. Schaffer WM, Jensen DB, Hobbs DE, Gurevitch J, Todd JR, Schaffer MV (1979) Competition, foraging energetics and the cost of sociality in three species of bees. Ecology 60: 976-987.
68. Schaffer WM, Zeh DW, Buchmann SL, Kleinhans S, Schaffer MV, Antrim J (1983) Competition for nectar between introduced honey bees and native North American bees and ants. Ecology 64: 564-577.
69. Schutzenhofer MR (2007) The effect of herbivory on the mating system of congeneric native and exotic Lespedeza species. Int J Plant Sci 168: 1021-1026.
70. Simberloff D (2006) Invasional meltdown 6 years later: important phenomenon, unfortunate metaphor, or both? Ecol Lett 9: 912-919.
71. Simberloff D, VonHolle B (1999) Positive interactions of nonindigenous species: invasional meltdown. Biol Invasions 1: 21-32.
72. Stitt RE (1946) Natural crossing and segregation in sericea lespedeza, Lespedeza cuneata (Dumont) G. Don. J Am Soc Agron 38: 1-5.
73. Stout JC, Kells AR, Goulson D (2002) Pollination of the invasive exotic shrub Lupinus arboreus (Fabaceae) by introduced bees in Tasmania. Biol Conserv 106: 425-434.
74. Stout JC, Parnell JAN, Arroyo J, Crowe TP (2006) Pollination ecology and seed production of Rhododendron ponticum in native and exotic habitats. Biodivers Conserv 15: 755-777.
75. Sundberg MI, Slaughter DM, Crupper SS (2002) Application of randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) fingerprinting to detect genetic variation in sericea lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata). T Kans Acad Sci 105: 91-95.
76. Takakura K-I, Nishida T, Matsumoto T, Nishida S (2009) Alien dandelion reduces the seed-set of a native congener through frequency-dependent and one-sided effects. Biol Invasions 11: 973-981.
77. Thomson D (2005) Measuring the effects of invasive species on the demography of a rare endemic plant. Biol Invasions 7: 615-624.
78. Totland Ø, Nielsen A, Bjerknes A, Ohlson M (2006) Effects of an exotic plant and habitat disturbance on pollinator visitation and reproduction in a boreal forest herb. Am J Bot 93: 868-873.
79. Traveset A, Richardson DM (2006) Biological invasions as disruptors of plant reproductive mutualisms. Trends Ecol Evol 21: 208-216.
80. Valdovinos FS, Ramos-Jiliberto R, Flores JD, Espinoza C, Lopez G (2009) Structure and dynamics of pollination networks: the role of alien plants. Oikos 118: 1190-1200.
81. Watson MA, Casper BB (1984) Morphogenetic constraints on patterns of carbon distribution in plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 15: 233-258.
82. Wilson JRU, Dormontt EE, Prentis PJ, Lowe AJ, Richardson DM (2009) Something in the way you move: dispersal pathways affect invasion success. Trends Ecol Evol 24: 136-144.
83. Woods TM (2006) A comparison of the reproductive systems of the invasive Lespedeza cuneata (Dum.-Cours.) G. Don (Fabaceae) with three native congeners in the Flint Hills region of the tallgrass prairie. M. S. Thesis, Kansas State University.
84. Woods TM, Hartnett DC, Ferguson CJ (2009) High propagule production and reproductive fitness homeostasis contribute to the invasiveness of Lespedeza cuneata (Fabaceae). Biol Invasions 11: 1913-1927.