Dilute H 2SO 4 and SO 2 pretreatments of Loblolly pine wood residue for bioethanol production

Industrial Biotechnology

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 22-30

  Huang, Fang ^a   Ragauskas, Arthur J ^a  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

enzyme hydrolysis; ethanol; fermentation; Loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.); pretreatment

Indexed keywords

BIO-ETHANOL PRODUCTION; CELLULOSE CONVERSION; CELLULOSE CRYSTALLINITY; ENZYME HYDROLYSIS; FERMENTATION PROCESS; LOBLOLLY PINE; LOBLOLLY PINE WOOD; PINUS TAEDA; PRE-TREATMENT; PRE-TREATMENTS; STEMWOODS; TWEEN 80;

BIOETHANOL; CELLULOSE; ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; GLUCOSE; SULFUR DIOXIDE; WOOD;

FORESTRY;

CELLULOSE; ENZYMOLYSIS; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; GLUCOSE; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; PINUS TAEDA; PRETREATMENT; SULFUR DIOXIDE; WOOD;

PINUS TAEDA;

EID: 84859797526     PISSN: 15509087     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/ind.2011.0018     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Alvira P, Tomás-Pejó E, Ballesteros M, Negro, MJ. Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis: A review Bioresour Technol 2010;101:4851-4861.
2. Sun Y, Cheng J. Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: A review Bioresour Technol 2002;83:1-11. (Pubitemid 34126398)
3. Hamelinck CN, van Hooijdonk G, Faaij APC. Ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass: Techno-economic performance in short-, middle-and long-term. Biomass Bioenerg 2005;28:384-410.
4. Galbe M, Zacchi G. Pretreatment of lignocellulosic materials for efficient bioethanol production. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 2007;108:41-65. (Pubitemid 47434542)
5. Ragauskas AJ, Williams, CK, Davison BH, et al. The path forward for biofuels and biomaterials Science 2006;311(5760):484-489. (Pubitemid 43158454)
6. Dalgaard T, Jorgensen U, Olesen JE, et al. Looking at biofuels and bioenergy. Science 2006;312(5781):1743-1744.
7. Chandra RP, Bura R, Mabee WE, et al. Substrate pretreatment: The key to effective enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosics. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 2007;108:67.
8. Leonowicz A, Matuszewska A, Luterek J, et al. Biodegradation of lignin by white rot fungi. Fungal Genet Biol 1999;27(2-3):175-185. (Pubitemid 29412839)
9. Wyman CE, Dale BE, Elander RT, et al. Coordinated development of leading biomass pretreatment technologies. Bioresour Technol 2005;96(18):1959-1966. (Pubitemid 41174565)
10. Wyman CE, Dale BE, Elander RT, et al. Comparative sugar recovery data from laboratory scale application of leading pretreatment technologies to corn stover. Bioresour Technol 2005;96(18):2026-2032. (Pubitemid 41174572)
11. Liu CG, Wyman CE. Partial flow of compressed-hot water through corn stover to enhance hemicellulose sugar recovery and enzymatic digestibility of cellulose. Bioresour Technol 2005;96(18):1978-1985. (Pubitemid 41174567)
12. Wang GS, Pan XJ, Zhu JY, Gleisner R. Sulfite pretreatment to overcome recalcitrance of lignocellulose (SPORL) for robust enzymatic saccharification of hardwoods. Biotechnol Prog 2009;25(4):1086-1093.
13. Mosier N, Wyman C, Dale B, et al. Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 2005;96:673-686. (Pubitemid 39592889)
14. Avellar BK, Glasser WG. Steam-assisted biomass fractionation I: Process considerations and economic evaluation. Biomass Bioenerg 1998;14(3):205-218. (Pubitemid 28244479)
15. Glasser WG, Wright RS. Steam-assisted biomass fractionation II: Fractionation behavior of various biomass resources. Biomass Bioenerg 1998;14(3):219-235. (Pubitemid 28244480)
16. Brownell HH, Yu EKC, Saddler JN. Steam explosion pretreatment of wood: Effect of chip size, acid, moisture content, and pressure drop. Biotechnol Bioeng 1986;28:792-801. (Pubitemid 16568381)
17. Weil JR, Sarikaya A, Rau S-L. Pretreatment of yellow poplar sawdust by pressure cooking in water. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 1997;68(1-2):21-40. (Pubitemid 127500468)
18. Kim Y, Mosier NS, Ladisch NR. Enzymatic digestion of liquid hot water pretreated hybrid poplar. Biotechnol Prog 2009;25(2):340-348.
19. Knappert DR, Grethlein HE. Converse AO. Partial acid hydrolysis of poplar wood as a pretreatment for enzymatic hydrolysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 1981;11:67-77.
20. Yang B, Wyman CE. Effect of xylan and lignin removal by batch and flow through pretreatment on the enzymatic digestibility of corn stover cellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng 2004;86(1):88-95. (Pubitemid 38339395)
21. Sannigrahi P, Ragauskas AJ, Miller SJ. Effects of two-stage dilute acid pretreatment on the structure and composition of lignin and cellulose in Loblolly pine Bioenerg Res 2008;1:205-214.
22. Mackie KL, Brownell HH, West KL, Saddler JN. Effect of sulfur dioxide and sulphuric acid on steam explosion of aspenwood. J Wood Chem Technol 1985;5(3):405-425. (Pubitemid 15567994)
23. Wan C, Zhou Y, Li Y. Liquid hot water and alkaline pretreatment of soybean straw for improving cellulose digestibility. Bioresour Technol 2011;102:6254-6259.
24. Kim TH, Kim JS, Sunwoo C, Lee YY. Pretreatment of corn stover by aqueous ammonia. Bioresour Technol 2003;90:39-47. (Pubitemid 36814047)
25. Teymouri F, Laureano-Perez L, Alizadeh H, et al. Optimization of the ammonia fiber explosion (AFEX) treatment parameters for enzymatic hydrolysis of corn stover. Bioresour Technol 2005;96:2014-2018. (Pubitemid 41174571)
26. Shuai L, Yang Q, Zhu JY, et al. Comparative study of SPORL and dilute-acid pretreatments of spruce for cellulosic ethanol production. Bioresour Technol 2010;101:3106-3114.
27. Rydholm SA. Pulping Processes. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1965:657.
28. Casebier RL, Hamilton JK, Hergert HL. Chemistry and mechanism of water prehydrolysis of southern pine wood. Tappi 1969;52(12):2369-2377.
29. Elmore CL. Method of producing Kraft pulp using an acid prehydrolysis and pre-extraction. US Patent No. 4,436,586 (1984).
30. Cara C, Ruiz E, Oliva JM, et al. Conversion of olive tree biomass into fermentable sugars by dilute acid pretreatment and enzymatic saccharification. Bioresour Technol 2008;99:1869-1876.
31. Wyman CE. Handbook on Bioethanol: Production and Utilization. Washington, DC: Taylor Francis, 1996:417.
32. Hsu TA. Pretreatment of biomass. In: Wyman, CE, ed. Handbook on Bioethanol Production and Utilization. Applied Energy Technology Series. Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis, 1996:Chapter 10.
33. Tomme P, Warren RAJ, Gilkes NR. Cellulose hydrolysis by bacteria and fungi. Adv Microb Physiol 1995;3:71-81.
34. Duff S, Murray W. Bioconversion of forest products industry waste cellulosics to fuel ethanol: A review. Bioresour Technol 1996;55:1-33. (Pubitemid 26139082)
35. Taherzadeh MJ, Karimi K. Enzyme-based hydrolysis processes for ethanol from lignocellulosic materials: A review. Bioresources 2007;2(4):707-738.
36. Kristensen JB, Börjesson J, Bruun MH, et al. Use of surface active additives in enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat straw lignocellulose. Enzyme Microb Technol 2007;40:888-895. (Pubitemid 46329082)
37. Eriksson T, Börjesson J, Tjerneld F. Mechanism of surfactant effect in enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose. Enzyme Microb Technol 2002;31:353-364. (Pubitemid 34790241)
38. Tu M, Zhang X, Pace M, et al. Effect of surfactants on separate hydrolysis fermentation and simultaneous saccharification fermentation of pretreated Lodgepole pine. Biotechnol Prog 2009;25(4)1122-1129.
39. Alkasrawi M, Eriksson T, Börjesson J, et al. The effect of Tween 20 on simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of softwood to ethanol. Enzyme Microb Technol 2003;33(1):71-78. (Pubitemid 36733570)
40. Börjesson J, Peterson R, Tjerneld F. Enhanced enzymatic conversion of softwood lignocellulose by poly(ethylene glycol addition. Enzyme Microb Technol 2007;40:754-762. (Pubitemid 46329068)
41. Kim SB, Kim HJ, Kim CJ. Enhancement of the enzymatic digestibility of waste newspaper using Tween. Appl Biochem Biotech 2006;129-132:486-495.
42. Helle SS, Duff SJB, Cooper DG. Effect of surfactants on cellulose hydrolysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 1993;42:611-617. (Pubitemid 23237985)
43. Kaar WE, Holtzapple M. Benefits from Tween during enzymatic hydrolysis of corn stover. Biotechnol Bioeng 1998;59:419-427. (Pubitemid 28340703)
44. Kim MH, Lee SB, Ryu DDY. Surface deactivation of cellulase and its prevention. Enzyme Microb Technol 1982;4:99-103. (Pubitemid 12505112)
45. Park JW, Takahata Y, Kajiuchi T, Akehata T. Effects of nonionic surfactant on enzymatic-hydrolysis of used newspaper. Biotechnol Bioeng 1992;39: 117-120.
46. Galbe M, Zacchi G. A review of the production of ethanol from softwood. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2002;59:618-628.
47. Karchesy JJ, Hemingway RW. Loblolly pine bark polyflavanoids. J Agric Food Chem 1980;28:222-228.
48. Koch P. "Utilization of the Southern Pines Vol. I and II." USDA Forest Service Agricultural Handbook. Washington, DC: USDA. 1972:420.
49. Frederick Jr WJ, Lien SJ, Courchene CE, et al. Production of ethanol from carbohydrates from Loblolly pine: A technical and economic assessment. Bioresour Technol 2008;99:5051-5057.
50. Eisenbies MH, Vance ED, Aust WM, Seiler JR. Intensive utilization of harvest residues in southern pine plantations: Quantities available and implications for nutrient budgets and sustainable site productivity. Bioenerg Res 2009; 2:90-98.
51. Petrolia DR. Ethanol from biomass: Economic and environmental potential of converting corn stover and hardwood forest residue in Minnesota. Presentation at: American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Long Beach, CA, 2006.
52. Lu Y, Yang B, Gregg D, et al. Cellulase adsorption and an evaluation of enzyme recycle during hydrolysis of steam-exploded softwood residues. Appl Biochem Biotech 2002;98-100:641-654. (Pubitemid 34460655)
53. Berg A, Navarrete P, Olave L. Biochemicals and standardized solid fuels from Radiata pine bark. Presentation at: 15th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition. Berlin, Germany, 2007.
54. Wise LE, Murphy M, D'Addieco AA. Chlorite holocellulose, its fraction, and bearing on summative wood analysis and studies on the hemicellulose. Paper Trade J 1946;22:34-44.
55. Hubbell CA, Ragauskas AJ. Effect of acid-chlorite delignification on cellulose degree of polymerization. Bioresour Technol 2010;101(19):7410-7415.
56. Samuel R, Pu Y, Raman B, Ragauskas AJ. Structural characterization and comparison of switchgrass ball-milled lignin before and after dilute acid pretreatment. Appl Biochem Biotech 2010;162:62-74.
57. Lin S. Methods in lignin chemistry. In: Dence C, ed. Springer Series in Wood Science. Berlin: Springer, 1992:578.
58. Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R, et al. "Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass laboratory analytical procedure." Golden, CO: Nationa Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2008.
59. Cateto C, Hu G, Ragauskas AJ. Enzymatic hydrolysis of Organosolv Kanlow switchgrass and its impact on cellulose crystallinity and degree of polymerization. Energ Environ Sci 2011;4(4):1516-1521.
60. Martinez A, Rodriguez ME, York SW, et al. Furans measurements (UV method). Biotechnol Prog 2000;16;637-641
61. Ouyang J, Dong Z, Song X, et al. Improved enzymatic hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose (Avicel PH101) by polyethylene glycol addition Bioresour Technol 2010;101:6685-6691
62. Larsson PT, Wickholm K, Iversen T. A CP/MAS 13C NMR investigation of molecular ordering in celluloses. Carbohyd Res 1997;302(1-2):19-25. (Pubitemid 27343473)
63. Hult EL, Larsson PT, Iversen T. A comparative CP/MAS 13C-NMR study of the supermolecular structure of polysaccharides in sulphite and Kraft pulps. Holzforschung 2002;56(2):179-184. (Pubitemid 34614415)
64. Larsson PT, Hult EL, Wickholm K, et al. CP/MAS 13C-NMR spectroscopy applied to structure and interaction studies on cellulose. I. Solid state. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance 1999;15(1):31-40
65. Pu Y, Ziemer C, Ragauskas AJ. CP/MAS 13C NMR analysis of cellulase treated bleached softwood Kraft pulp. Carbohyd Res 2006;341:591-597. (Pubitemid 43323356)
66. Newman RH, Ha AM, Melton, LD. Solid-state 13C NMR investigation of molecular ordering in the cellulose of apple cell walls. J Agric Food Chem 1994;42:1402-1406.
67. Ek R, Wormald P, Ostelius J, et al. Crystallinity index of microcrystalline cellulose particles compressed into tablets. Int J Pharm 1995;125:257-264.
68. Solar R, Melcer I, Kaćik F. Comparative study of pine wood and pine bark (Pinus Silvestris L) dioxin lignins. Cellulose Chem Technol 1988:22;39-52.
69. Solar R, Kaćik F, Melcer I. The comparison of chemical and structural differences of Caribbean pine (Pinus caribea L) wood and bark lignin. Holz Roh Werkst 1992;50:291-294.
70. Sannigrahi P, Kim DH, Jung S, Ragauskas AJ. Pseudo-lignin and pretreatment chemistry. Energ Environ Sci 2011;4:1306-1310.
71. 4 impregnation of softwood prior to steam pretreatment on ethanol production. Appl Biochem Biotech 1998;70-72:3-15. (Pubitemid 28361028)
72. 2 impregnation for ethanol production. Appl Biochem Biotech. 2002;98-100:5-21 (Pubitemid 34460630)
73. Tu M, Chandra RP, Saddler JN. Recycling cellulases during the hydrolysis of steam exploded and ethanol pretreated Lodgepole pine. Biotechnol Prog 2007;23:1130-1137. (Pubitemid 47587086)