A comparison of biocompatibility and osseointegration of ceramic and titanium implants: An in vivo and in vitro study

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Volumn 41, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 638-645

  Moller B ^a   Terheyden, H ^b   Ail, Y ^a   Purcz, N M ^a   Hertrampf, K ^a   Tabakov, A ^a   Behrens, E ^a   Wiltfang, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCHLESWIG HOLSTEIN   (Germany)

^b Red Cross Hospital   (Germany)

Author keywords

biocompatibility; cell growth; dental implants; osseointegration; zirconia

Indexed keywords

TITANIUM; ZIRCONIUM;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BONE REGENERATION; CERAMICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTACT ANGLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOTOXICITY TEST; EXPERIMENTAL PIG; FEMALE; FRONTAL BONE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IMPLANT; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; MORPHOMETRICS; NONHUMAN; OSTEOBLAST; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPE; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BONE MATRIX; BROMODEOXYURIDINE; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SURVIVAL; CERAMICS; COLORING AGENTS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; FEMALE; FLUORESCEINS; FLUORESCENT DYES; FRONTAL BONE; HUMANS; L-LACTATE DEHYDROGENASE; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MODELS, ANIMAL; OSSEOINTEGRATION; OSTEOBLASTS; OSTEOCALCIN; SWINE; TETRAZOLIUM SALTS; THIAZOLES; TIME FACTORS; TITANIUM; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 84859795382     PISSN: 09015027     EISSN: 13990020     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2012.02.004     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. A. Scarano, F. Di Carlo, M. Quaranta, and A. Piattelli Bone response to zirconia ceramic implants: an experimental study in rabbits J Oral Implantol 29 2003 8 12
2. A. Sicilia, S. Cuesta, G. Coma, I. Arregui, C. Guisasola, E. Ruiz, and A. Maestra Titanium allergy in dental implant patients: a clinical study on 1500 consecutive patients Clin Oral Implants Res 19 2008 823 835
3. M. Esposito, J. Hirsch, U. Lekholm, and P. Thomsen Differential diagnosis and treatment strategies for biologic complications and failing oral implants: a review of the literature Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 14 1999 473 490
4. S. Garcia-Bellosta, M. Bravo, C. Subira, and J.J. Echeverria Retrospective study of the long-term survival of 980 implants placed in a periodontal practice Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 25 2010 613 619
5. H. Egusa, N. Ko, T. Shimazu, and H. Yatani Suspected association of an allergic reaction with titanium dental implants: a clinical report J Prosthet Dent 100 2008 344 347
6. J.R. Kelly, and I. Denry Stabilized zirconia as a structural ceramic: an overview Dent Mater 24 2008 289 298
7. A. Caglar, B.T. Bal, C. Aydin, H. Yilmaz, and S. Ozkan Evaluation of stresses occurring on three different zirconia dental implants: three-dimensional finite element analysis Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 25 2010 95 103
8. C. Piconi, and G. Maccauro Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial Biomaterials 20 1999 1 25 (Pubitemid 29002541)
9. B. Yang, K. Ludwig, R. Adelung, and M. Kern Micro-tensile bond strength of three luting resins to human regional dentin Dent Mater 22 2006 45 56 (Pubitemid 41808725)
10. J.F. Hönig, and H.A. Merten Das Göttinger Miniaturschwein (GMS) als Versuchstier in der human-medizinischen osteologischen Grundlagenforschung Z Zahnärztl Implantol 2 1993 244 254
11. K. Donath, and G. Breuner A method for the study of undecalcified bones and teeth with attached soft tissues. The Sage-Schliff (sawing and grinding) technique J Oral Pathol 11 1982 318 326 (Pubitemid 12092572)
12. W. Schulte, H. Kleineikenscheidt, R. Schareyka, and G. Heimke Concept and testing of the Tubingen immediate implant Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 33 1978 319 325
13. M. Andreiotelli, H.J. Wenz, and R.J. Kohal Are ceramic implants a viable alternative to titanium implants? A systematic literature review Clin Oral Implants Res 20 2009 32 47
14. C. Oblak, P. Jevnikar, T. Kosmac, N. Funduk, and L. Marion Fracture resistance and reliability of new zirconia posts J Prosthet Dent 91 2004 342 348 (Pubitemid 38515794)
15. H.C. Ko, J.S. Han, M. Bachle, J.H. Jang, S.W. Shin, and D.J. Kim Initial osteoblast-like cell response to pure titanium and zirconia/alumina ceramics Dent Mater 23 2007 1349 1355 (Pubitemid 47391007)
16. R. Depprich, M. Ommerborn, H. Zipprich, C. Naujoks, J. Handschel, H.P. Wiesmann, N.R. Kübler, and U. Meyer Behavior of osteoblastic cells cultured on titanium and structured zirconia surfaces Head Face Med 4 2008 29
17. D. Rothamel, D. Ferrari, M. Herten, F. Schwarz, and J. Becker Biokompatibilität und Hartgewebsintegration einphasiger oberflächenstrukturierter Zirkoniumoxidimplantate - Eine kombinierte in vitro - und in vivo-Studie Implantologie 15 2007 405 414
18. O. Hoffmann, N. Angelov, F. Gallez, R.E. Jung, and F.E. Weber The zirconia implant-bone interface: a preliminary histologic evaluation in rabbits Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 23 2008 691 695
19. S. Ponader, E. Vairaktaris, P. Heinl, C.V. Wilmowsky, A. Rottmair, C. Korner, R.F. Singer, S. Holst, K.A. Schlegel, F.W. Neukam, and E. Nkenke Effects of topographical surface modifications of electron beam melted Ti-6Al-4V titanium on human fetal osteoblasts J Biomed Mater Res A 84 2008 1111 1119 (Pubitemid 351295022)
20. T. Fillies, H.P. Wiesmann, D. Sommer, U. Joos, and U. Meyer Osteoblast reaction on SLA and microgrooved implant surfaces Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 9 2005 24 28 (Pubitemid 40233054)
21. C.H. Lohmann, L.F. Bonewald, M.A. Sisk, V.L. Sylvia, D.L. Cochran, D.D. Dean, B.D. Boyan, and Z. Schwartz Maturation state determines the response of osteogenic cells to surface roughness and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 J Bone Miner Res 15 2000 1169 1180 (Pubitemid 30350080)
22. S. Guizzardi, C. Galli, D. Martini, S. Belletti, A. Tinti, M. Raspanti, P. Taddei, A. Ruggeri, and R. Scandroglio Different titanium surface treatment influences human mandibular osteoblast response J Periodontol 75 2004 273 282 (Pubitemid 38372270)
23. L. Hao, J. Lawrence, and K.S. Chian Osteoblast cell adhesion on a laser modified zirconia based bioceramic J Mater Sci Mater Med 16 2005 719 726 (Pubitemid 40909696)
24. M. Gahlert, T. Gudehus, S. Eichhorn, E. Steinhauser, H. Kniha, and W. Erhardt Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs Clin Oral Implants Res 18 2007 662 668
25. L. Sennerby, and J. Gottlow Clinical outcomes of immediate/early loading of dental implants. A literature review of recent controlled prospective clinical studies Aust Dent J 53 2008 S82 S88
26. K.A. Schlegel, F.J. Lang, K. Donath, J.T. Kulow, and J. Wiltfang The monocortical critical size bone defect as an alternative experimental model in testing bone substitute materials Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 102 2006 7 13 (Pubitemid 44016117)
27. K. Gotfredsen, T. Berglundh, and J. Lindhe Anchorage of titanium implants with different surface characteristics: an experimental study in rabbits Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2 2000 120 128
28. R.G. Triplett, U. Frohberg, N. Sykaras, and R.D. Woody Implant materials, design, and surface topographies: their influence on osseointegration of dental implants J Long Term Eff Med Implants 13 2003 485 501 (Pubitemid 38101434)
29. L. Sennerby, A. Dasmah, B. Larsson, and M. Iverhed Bone tissue responses to surface-modified zirconia implants: a histomorphometric and removal torque study in the rabbit Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 7 2005 S13 S20 (Pubitemid 40853683)
30. Z. Schwartz, K. Kieswetter, D.D. Dean, and B.D. Boyan Underlying mechanisms at the bone-surface interface during regeneration J Periodontal Res 32 1997 166 171 (Pubitemid 127521669)