For-profit colleges in the context of the market for higher education

Earnings From Learning: The Rise of For-Profit Universities

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 51-68

  Turner, Sarah E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859787512     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (25)

1. Betts, J., & McFarland, L. (1995). Safe port in a storm: The impact of labor market conditions on community college enrollments. Journal of Human Resources, 30(4), 741-765.
2. Bowen,W. (1994). Inside the boardroom: Governance by directors and trustees. New York: Wiley.
3. Blumenstyk, G. (2004, May 14). For-profit colleges face new scrutiny. Chronicle of Higher Education.
4. College Board. (2003). Trends in student aid. http://www. collegeboard. com/prod-downloads/press/cost03/cb-trends-aid-2003. pdf
5. Elzinga, K., & Hogarty,T. (1973). The problem of geographic definition in antimerger suits. Antitrust Bulletin, 18, 45-81.
6. Freeman, R. (1974). Occupational training in proprietary schools and technical institutes. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 56(3), 310-318.
7. Gaynor, M., & Vogt,W. (1999). Antitrust and competition in health care markets. (NBER Working Paper No. 7112).
8. Gladieux, L. (1995). Federal student aid policy: A history and an assessment. http://www. ed. gov/offices/OPE/PPI/FinPostSecEd/gladieux. html
9. Goldin, C., & Katz, L. F. (1999). The shaping of higher education: The formative years in the United States, 1890-1940. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(1), 37-62.
10. Hansmann, H. (1998, September). Higher education as an associative good. Paper presented at the Symposium of the Forum for the Future of Higher Education, Aspen, Colorado.
11. Hansmann, H. (1987). Economic theories of nonprofit organization. In W. Powell (Ed. ), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook. New Haven: Yale University Press.
12. Honick, C. (1995). The story behind proprietary schools in the United States, In D. A. Clowes and E. Hawthorne, (Eds. ) Community colleges and proprietary schools: Conflict or convergence? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
13. Hoxby, C. (1998). How the changing market structure of U. S. higher education explains tuition (NBER Working Paper No. 6323).
14. Hoxby, C. (1997). The changing market structure of U. S. higher education. Harvard University, mimeo.
15. Hughes, M. (2004, July 9). Education services: Review of for-profit education pricing. Sun Trust Robinson Humphrey Report.
16. McPherson, M., & Schapiro, M. (1991). Keeping college affordable. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
17. Oster, S. (1997). An analytical framework for thinking about the use of for-profit structures for university services and activities. Paper presented at the Symposium of the Forum for the Future of Higher Education. Aspen, Colorado.
18. Seftor, N. and Turner, S. (2002). Back to school: Federal student aid policy and adult college enrollment. The Journal of Human Resources, 37(2), 336-352.
19. Sperling, J., & Tucker, R. W. (1997). For-profit higher education: Developing a world class workforce. New Brunswick: Transaction.
20. Tebbs, J., & Turner, S. (2005). College education for low income students: A caution on the use of data on Pell Grant recipients. Change 37(4), 34-43.
21. Turner, S. E. (2004). Pell grants as fiscal stabilizers. University of Virginia, Mimeo.
22. U. S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2003). Digest of education statistics, 2002 (NCES Publication No. 2003-060) Washington: T. D. Snyder and C. M. Hoffman. Washington, DC.
23. U. S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education. (2003). Title IV/Federal Pell Grant program 2002-2003 end of year report. http://www. ed. gov/ finaid/prof/resources/data/pell0203. pdf
24. Winston, G. (1998, November). For-profit education: Godzilla or Chicken Little? (Discussion Paper No. 49) Williams Project for the Economics of Higher Education, Williams College.
25. Wyatt, E. (1999, November 4). Investors see room for profit in nation's demand for education. New York Times, p. A1.